According to several reports, the “canonization” of Giovanni Battista Montini, aka Pope Paul VI, is likely to take place in 2018.
Word has it that it may very well happen in October when the Synod of Bishops is in session to “ask young people to help the Church in identifying the most effective ways to announce the Good News today.” (see Synod Preparatory Document)
If indeed this is when Paul VI receives the Conciliar Lifetime Achievement Award in Service to the Revolution (or what Rome presently calls “canonization”), the timing is at least fitting.
After all, the Synod of Bishops as we know it was established by Paul VI in 1965 via the Apostolic Letter, Apostolica Sollicitudo.
According to this Letter, one of the “general purposes” of the Synod is:
To facilitate agreement, at least on essential matters of doctrine and on the course of action to be taken in the life of the Church.
Think it about it…
In 1965, exactly which “essential matters of doctrine” were as yet so incompletely defined as to constitute a legitimate source of disagreement among authentic Catholics?
The answer: Not one.
Even so, the Council, which was just months away from closing, was busily setting the stage for a new religion; the one currently preached in Modernist Rome. The Synod was intended to serve as, and presently is, nothing more than a tool for fooling the naïve into believing that this new religion is Catholic.
The same can be said for certain post-conciliar “canonizations.”
It occurred to me long ago that making of Paul VI a canonized saint was more than likely a part of the modernist masterplan even well before the man died; with the real purpose being to elevate the Novus Ordo Missae above suspicion in the minds of the same aforementioned naïve.
Why, I often used to wonder, was this not done already?
The reason it has taken so long, I believe, is that the Devil, who is guiding these events, is patient. Mere human beings like us tend to think in terms of a lifetime, while the Evil One, by contrast, plots and plans in generational terms.
As such, Satan was simply biding his time until the faithful were sufficiently stripped of their sensus Catholicus to accept the utterly preposterous notion that Paul VI is a saint.
Having tested the waters with the “canonization” of John Paul II, which based on the reaction of the rank and file was a tremendous success, he is apparently rather confident that the time is nigh.
But is it really?
Already there are signs that Francis is slowly opening the eyes of the naïve to the reality of the present crisis. It is my hope – and to an extent, my expectation – that the “canonization” of Paul VI will only accelerate that process.
How so?
No one other than Satan himself has done more to promote the “cult of man” over and against the cult of Jesus Christ, and blatantly so, than Paul VI.
[For those who have yet to read it, do yourself a favor and read Paul VI Beatified? by Fr. Luigi Villa, which provides copious quotes attesting to his disastrous, anthropocentric pontificate.]
Many if not most neo-conservatives already understand that the “cult of man” is poison in the Body of Christ.
This is true even of the most intransigent papalaters in Catholic media who refuse to associate the crisis in the Church with any of the claimants to the Chair of St. Peter; either past or present. Likewise is this true of their supporters.
Take, for example, the poster boy of such persons, Michael Voris.
In one of his “Vortex” episodes of 2013, he railed:
Too much of Catholic leadership these days derives from the cult of man. In fact, it is precisely the cult of man which gives rise to the Church of nice … the natural generation of the cult of man wherein man is considered more than God is. One could very easily and rightly say that it is in the Church of nice where the cult of man worships; where the cult of man finds its natural spiritual home.
From whom and how did this “cult of man” manage to infiltrate the Church of Christ?
The Second Vatican Council, of course, but only with the help of Paul VI who said at its closing (among many other things):
Do you at least recognize this merit, you modern humanists who have no place for the transcendence of the things supreme, and come to know our new humanism: we also, we more than anyone else, have the cult of man.
This is the same Paul VI who said:
Peace is a most human thing. If we seek wherefrom it really comes, we discover that it sinks its roots in the loyal sense of man. A peace that is not born of the real cult of man, is not essentially a peace.
So much for Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace.
He also said:
This Council… in conclusion, will give us a simple, new and solemn teaching to love man in order to love God.
And here you thought it was the other way around!
I could go on all day with quotes from Paul VI calling on man to worship man, but the point has presumably been made.
Paul VI didn’t just kiss a Qur’an once, or hold a couple of ecumenical prayer gatherings at Assisi (as abominable as these actions are, they are excusable as momentary lapses in judgment in the minds of foolish neoconservatives); rather, he ordered his entire pontificate on, and directed the entire Church toward, precisely the “cult of man” that men like Michael Voris and their supporters readily recognize as poison.
What will they do when Rome holds him up as a “saint” – a man of heroic virtue worthy of emulation?
Sure, there is a pretty good chance that some if not all of them will make excuses; perhaps with an eye toward keeping the franchise chugging along.
If so, at the very least I would expect that many of their current supporters will be forced to open their eyes and to reevaluate both their faith and their patronage.
With all of this in mind, the “canonization” of Paul VI cannot happen soon enough.
ahhh,
PP6th’s canonization will appear to give more sanctity to Vat 2 and to the cult of man , just like the canonization of Escriva has given the appearance of sanctification to Opus Dei despite what has happened to so many who joined as numeraries and numerary assistants and live in the Houses of the Movement .
The Legion was planning on the same for Maciel ,even building his mausoleum shrine, until both Gerald Renner (RIP) and Jason Berry made the initial effort to get the truth widely available covered in the Press.
I want to know why the Vatican approved and then sealed the apparition and messages to the Freemason convert Bruno at Trefontine, after 40 people all saw the sun doing exactly what it did at Fatima. Like Fatima , what is it they do not want the world to know?
It was only a matter of time. Now the vatican 2 church will have its first homosexual “saint”. The hits just keep on coming.
You are so right! Everyone should read all of Fr Luigi Villa’s Chiesa Viva articles. They’re all on the Chiesa Viva website and they are 100% worth the reading. Pope John XXIII was the Freemason’s “chosen one ” and as a Freemason, he was ordered to arrange Vatican II to begin the destruction of the Catholic Church. When John XXIII got cancer – they had ANOTHER Freemason Paul VI waiting in the wings to take over. That man left orders that there was to be no Catholic symbols on his coffin – not even a cross. On his mother’s headstone there are masonic symbols too! After the disgusting farces of the canonizations of J XXIII and JP II they now want to add insult to injury by another mockery for Paul VI. God help us all.
Pope Benedict has many saving graces or they wouldn’t have forced his retirement!
“In 1965, exactly which “essential matters of doctrine” were as yet so incompletely defined as to constitute a legitimate source of disagreement among authentic Catholics?”
ANSWER: According to Cardinal Ratzinger, it was the Galileo Affair that was in the back of the minds of the Periti entering into the Council.
– How could the Church, Popes and Holy Spirit and writers of Sacred Scripture so colossally screw up what modern science and the cult of man had proven to be wrong?
If Man and Scientism was correct then that means the Scriptures were not reliable in history or factual statements regarding the world, the Popes exercising the full weight of their authority were not infallible, and then therefore the Holy Spirit could not have been guiding them, or the Holy Spirit and God Himself were themselves evolving, and the Church was not the sole guarantor or truth, but one of many and together also needed to evolve, dialogue and learn from modern man and scientific progress.
Modernism and the heretics believe the Earth moves through space, is not the center of the universe and that the Genesis Creation Account is poetic literature.
The grand majority of Catholics have also been led away from such foundational truth, and thus their belief and missionary zeal is handicapped because they feel they have to set their foundation on Modernist Science first, which is an incomprehensible mess of metaphysical nonsense.
This includes many so-called ‘sedevacantists’ who also put Charles Darwin and Nicolas Copernicus before God and His Holy Church and with the other side of their mouths deny the Papal teachings and enforcement of Galileo’s defined propositions as FORMALLY HERETICAL. These Sedevacantists are just as much in the trap of the ‘Novus Ordo’ cult. The Devil doesn’t care if their communion with the Novus Ordo is ‘partial.’
The Novus Ordo, the Vatican II Council, the roots of Modernism – all stem from the rejection of the Church’s teaching from the Jewish Tradition and from the Unanimous Consent of the Fathers and the Dogmatic Council of Trent when interpreting Scripture, that it is Geocentric. Actual scientific research also bears this out. And to believe otherwise means one must accept Einstein’s Relativistic nonsense or that we occupy one of many universes, which means there are many Churches many Christs and many Trinities, which is what led to the precise thinking and rebellion of occultic heretics like Giordano Bruno, Neitzche and so on.
Johnno
Im a sede. Im as far away from the NO cult as you can possibly be. Know your enemies my friend….Im not one of them.
The reason this post made me think of this little known Approved apparition this was it is for the “Purgation of the Church” ,which apparently Pope Pius the 12th was given a message about and kept it sealed .
Correction ….3000 people saw the miracle of the sun as in Fatima.
I spelled the sight wrong also. Sorry.
http://www.divinemysteries.info/the-virgin-of-revelation-tre-fontaine-rome-italy-1947/
Watch how the “traditional Catholic” goalposts move again…..
It’s amazing how the post conciliar saintly popes have created a demonic “church”. Perhaps, it is the Smoke of Satan at work.
So true, Louie, Satan is the one pulling the strings and he is patient when it serves him. One drop of poison at a time and then one day the patient is dead. Sure, it takes time but it is very effective.
They can “canonize” both Vatican II and sodomy in one fell swoop?
As a sede, you are as far away from Catholicism “as you can possibly can be” — essentially a protestant, but worse.
Sedes: more hated than the heretic fraud in the Chair.
So I take it you are in union with Bergolio? And share the same faith?
If Paul VI was a valid Pope, then he had authority from Christ to teach and Catholics had the duty to assent to his new mass and his council. . To do otherwise is disobedience to Christ. Protestants sift what teachings they adhere to and what teachings they reject. Not Catholics. And if Bergolio is a valid Pope and canonizes Montini, well its infaillable and you must accept it.
Dear Fleur de Lis–If the word “Catholicism” in your response means the N.O. V2 fake church, then your comment is a compliment. You are mistaking the True Catholic Faith for the pseudo catholic church. Those who distance themselves from the latter get closer to the former. Protestants are what they say they are–Protestant. N.O. catholics think they are Catholic when they really are Protestant.
If Pope Paul VI was a homosexual, at least that is not acknowledged. Things are much worse today, with Pope Francis’s having made Fr. James Martin, SJ, sodomy apologist, some official Vatican position.
Ponder this: Why is Jorge Bergoglio such a fan boy of Mr. Martin and all the other homosexual contemporaries? The most likely reason should be obvious.
Lily Flower , reading hearts is not your to do .
You have no particular knowledge of what any soul has endured or how they have been scandalized .
Are you so naive to think Our Lord has no Mercy or do you just go by the legalism and letter of the Law?
If so , perhaps you are under obligation to correct the grave errors committed by our priests ,Bishops and Cardinals and maybe even the Pope instead of verbally slapping down distraught and heartbroken Catholic laity .
Just whom do you think bears the most responsibility ? Hint…read Scripture.
Bergoglio is a sodomite?
“If Paul VI was a valid Pope, then he had authority from Christ to teach and Catholics had the duty to assent to his new mass and his council.”
This statement is false.
(You’re baiting, again).
Pitied.
I am Catholic.
Bergoglio is not.
Fleur de Lis. I note that on every thread you are insulting and judgmental. I’m sure you’d be far more at home on the I Peter 5 site! Sorry but you spoil a great site here where others’ posts are respected.
Tom A. Lots of “IFS” there, my friend. The fact is that John XXIII and Paul VI were Freemasons ergo excommunicates….. ergo bad popes. Francis is a socialist Non-Catholic…….ergo a bad pope. To obey a bad pope is to disobey the Holy Spirit. Period!
Bad popes? Who determines who is a good pope or a bad pope? Those are relative terms. They either are or are not Pope. Once a Catholic accepts the persons claim to the Papacy, then that person must give various levels of assent to the various levels of magisterial teachings of the person believed to be the true papal claimant. Without exception, since the 1960s, the conciliar popes have consistently taught a modernistic humanistic version of christianity. They no longer teach what was once considered the Catholic faith. They, in fact, teach a new religion. If they are all valid Popes, then it is your duty to assent. Otherwise there is no longer unity of faith.
Ah, Fleur, so you can judge your pope is not Catholic and you can still remain Catholic. But sedes can’t say the same thing and make the logical and Catholic conclusion that a non-Catholic can’t possibly be the Vicar of Christ.
I pity those who are blinded to this reality.
John on-
“A peaceable tongue is a tree of life: but that which is immoderate, shall crush the spirit.”
Be not scornful of those who have never been led to the truth, rather instruct and shine light on the deception, in good will. God is the one who enlightens the soul, so be patient and hope.
Rich, I was on the fence until Jorge and his merry band of heretics began marauding and raping the Bride of Christ. I believe those who do not recognize that he is not Pope are operating under a spirit of diabolical disorientation and sorely need our prayers.
And I note that you are accusing and judging me personally– that is a sin.
Fleur is a first rate HYPOCRITE. Only she can judge others!
Swiss cheese sede-bait wrapped around truth.
Clever.
Fleur, you must obey your Pope on matters of Faith and Morals. If he is Pope and you refuse, this does not make him a “bad pope” but you a Bad Catholic! You have to sleep in the bed you made. He’s either the Pope or he is not. The hypocrisy is saying he is Pope and acting as if he were not. There is no provision for disobeying a legitimate pope on something as collossal as Aggiornamento and its massive cult of worship. At least Novus Ordo Catholics, however misguided, are consistent in this respect. Staunch anti sede Trads hold the most philosophically and canonically untenable position of all.
SF! You’re adrift too?!?
Fleur de Lis–First you say Bergoglio is NOT Catholic. Then you say accusing and judging others is a sin. Maybe you should get your thoughts in order before posting here.
Lily ,
Your words lack charity and understanding.
There are Catholics posting here who literally have nowhere to go for Mass.
Some NO masses are so Protestant they pose a real threat to the Faith for parents and definitely to the youth.
None of this is being addressed by the Vatican.
There ARE priests one cannot dare allow their children to go to.
Some NO parishes are catholic in name ONLY.
Sweep–You bring out a very good point. When N.O. catholics are not happy with their church for whatever reason, they could head down to another parish within reach. But where do Traditional Catholics go when there is no TLM available or when the TLM they were attending is no long a possibility (for various reasons)? It’s a sad state of affairs for sure.
2 Cents, According to Canon Law one may attend an Orthodox church if they do not have access to a Catholic Church to fulfill their Obligation. The Orthodox have valid Apostolic Succession priests sacraments and celebrate the beautiful Divine Liturgies of St Basil and St John Chrysostom. However, the Orthodox may not wish to Communicate you if you have not been annointed in the Orthodox Faith. On the other hand, the Catholic Church will freely give the Sacraments to an Orthodox .
We were blessed to have a wonderful Orthodox priest , who had left the Orth for the Catholic Faith for years as our pastor in a Catholic Byzantine Rite Church. He was horribly scandalized by the Bishop and the majority of disordered priests in the Diocese so he returned to the Orthodox and remains a close confidant to the few chaste priests in the Catholic Diocese he was in.
It was an Ecclesia Dei priest who ,knowing our situation advised us we could attend our former pastor’s Orthodox Church and he graciously administered the Sacraments to us.
Since then we have relocated and although the Local Ordinary is tied to serious scandals himself, we do have a TLM available served by what appears to be a Faithful priest.
We love the Divine Liturgies of St John and St Basil as well as the TLM Mass.
While these scandals and sins of the clerics should not matter to us they touched us in a very personal way. Our one cross dressing Catholic pastor had clearly denied the Real Presence in his Easter (Pascha) Homily and he had no idea how to hear Confession and saw no need of it.
An Eastern Archamndrite Catholic priest investigated for us and discovered this priest was not properly Ordained from his Bishop . The priest claimed to be Bi Ritual ( both Byzantine and Latin Rite) and contracted out to Bishops who needed his services. Said priest left the active priesthood after his own Diocesan Bishop then suspended him. Sadly, after his Bishop died the new Bishop who apparently sees no problem with him now, rehired him into his Diocese. I can only pray that the priest shortage has not swayed certain Bishops to hire disordered or questionable priests. But given the current climate in the institutional Church and the world , I have my doubts.
As i have stated before , we attended a local RCF parish back in the seventies. The long termed pastor made the Mass a sports entertainment comment session and slipped the assistant pastor five grand from the collection plate to leave the country as it was revealed he had been molesting twelve and thirteen yr old girls in the parish for over ten years. He is now wanted by the FBI and the pastor died while serving a sentence of community service in another state because he knew what his assistant was sing the entire time. He was replaced by an active sodomite pastor. We switched Rites and built a byzantine Catholic Mission Church. Five pastors later , three of whom were gravely disordered, the Bishop sold the church to Korean Evangelists.
A short stint in an sspx chapel which we traveled far to resulted in the revelation that the priest was trying to seduce young men in and out of the confessional.
Then in another close RC Diocese the Bishop allowed an ecclesia dei TLM priest in which he soon got rid of and replaced with his own disordered priest.
That was when we traveled quite a distance to attend the Liturgies of our former pastor in the Orthodox on the advice of the TLM Ecclesia Dei priest.
Now we are in another state.
as parents we are concerned with our own souls and the souls of our children and refuse t expose them to priests who are disordered, risking their own bodies and souls.
We have been judged as “Cafeteria Catholics” by ignorant Catholics like one poster above . Too bad because we answer to God alone !
Sweep, I believe the 1917 Code of Canon Law forbids any gathering with schismatic Orthodox. Do not follow the 1983 Code. It is the code of the modernist faith, not the Catholic faith.
Tom , in this particular case we knew the priest along with many other good Catholic priests and as one described him to us, “He is and always was the quintessential priest .”
If it were not for him at least four of the only chaste Catholic priests would have also left our Diocese. The Bishop and his merry band of sodomites and pederasts was THAT pervasive. i am told the new Bishop is better and takes seriously the complaints of the parishioners. He kicked one long time active sodomite out who was a star on EWTN and who is now trying to seek financial recompense via a lawsuit.
Fortunately, we are well versed as Eastern Catholics in the nature of the politics power and greed on both sides that divided the original Christian Church founded by Jesus and His Apostles. The crimes were on both sides and certainly is not the simplistic tale of schism we are told .
Hint……the Shroud of Turin and most of the relics in St Mark’s in Venice belong to the East. Sacked during the rapes murders, pillages and plunders of the so called Fourth Crusade launched by Venetian Aristocracy for monetary gain . The See of Rome was always considered the First Among Many by all the Bishops until the Fourth Crusade made it impossible to unite again because of the peoples who could not forget. There were four efforts between the Patriarchs of the East and the Popes for unification afterwards. They are still trying to unite and rightly so. No one wants to give up any power or properties. I can explain all the differences in Dogmas and Doctrine also, which are really not that different at all only from the perspective one takes.
read ….
https://www.amazon.com/Decline-Fall-Roman-Church/dp/0399126651
and the more recent discoveries by Vatican Secret Library archivist Barbara Frale during her research for her PhD from the University of Venice.
https://www.amazon.com/Templars-Shroud-Christ-Priceless-Christian/dp/1634502701
The title Pope did not come till later. By that time jealousies on BOTH sides had split the church.
Sweep, I am not disputing anything you say about the Eastern Churches, whether or not they are in union with Rome or not. I am suggesting or advising you not to reference anything that comes from the conciliar church of modern rome. The Eastern Orthodox have valid priests and sacraments. That is more than the conciliar church can claim. Any rapproachment between the East and the conciliarists would be useless since they would still not be in union with a true Pontiff, only a modernist charlatan and usurper.
Tom , believe it or not the Orthodox would agree with you. They have been flooded with Catholic priests who have switched of Orthodox after years of searching for a bishop in a Diocese free from living in a rectory with active homosexual priests. Very sad that Catholic Bishops are driving what few good priests we have out .On a basic natural level , a normal heterosexual man is revolted by male sodomites. complaining to your Local Superior gets you in trouble. They know it . Frs Despard ,Haley .Gallagher, O ‘Conner, Rueda and countless more have testified to this .
on the flip side some Orthodox Patriarchs are not doing their job either. They have been Ordaining poorly educated and pro homo sexualists in some cases too. i personally know of one Deacon whose mother was a lesbian and was turned down by a Russian Orth. Later, he found another Orthodox branch that allowed him in.
He is as dumb as an ox .his knowledge of the Early Church Fathers abysmal .
they do emphasize Tradition but some newbies are missing the point.
This is one Antiochian Orth who was actually hosted in our US Nunciature to give a talk. A friend heard him speak there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE2BdpiLxmI
Now , tell me why our own Prelates cannot find it in their homiletic repertoire to give an address like this? Are they ALL afraid of BLACKMAIL ?
I just had a Novus Ordo friend tell me that she believes that Francis is “a holy man” and has “great love for the Blessed Mother”. These folks are either blind or just not paying attention at all.
Sweep I sympathize with your agonizing choice, but I believe you are in error. One cannot communicate with the Orthodox as they themselves are heretics that permit contraception and divorce and remarriage. You’re going from one mess to another.
They’ve been at odds with the Catholic Church for 1000 years now. If they had just stayed Catholic, Constantinopol would probably still be a Christian city today and their would be no divided Balkans, and hence no World War I as it had transpired. Don’t imbibe their line of thinking too much–(I can see their polemic being repeated in your post—the “orthodox” patriarchs were all heretics of one kind or another for most of the 1st Millenium–that is historic reality–only Rome kept the faith through each crisis–the fact they finally accepted Christology and the Trinity was a happy and late accident before they broke with Rome) hence the INNATE danger of communicating with a non-Catholic church–they will turn you Orthodox by the human process of socialization.
As a Catholic, you are subjectively disposed to receiving grace from their sacrament, but their objective state precludes doing so.
Paul VI-the root of the rot.
https://www.truerestoration.org/season-4-the-root-of-the-rot-episode-11-paul-vi-the-pre-bergoglio/