I’ll get right to it: Where is that 300 page dossier that was submitted to Pope Benedict XVI just days before he decided to flee for fear of the wolves? This is the same report that, one has good reason to believe, provides details concerning a vast homosexual network operating in the Vatican.
According to a statement issued by the Holy See Press Office on February 26, 2013:
The Holy Father [Benedict] has decided that the acts of this investigation, known only to himself, remain solely at the disposition of the new pope.
Since having the dossier placed in his hands more than five years ago, what of any note has Jorge Bergoglio done with regard to the Church’s homo-clerical problem?
Well, he has done many things.
- He almost immediately appointed a flaming queer, Fr. Battista Ricca, Prelate of the IOR (Vatican Bank) and then famously declared of this same man’s gayness, “Who am I to judge?”
- He surrounded himself with men like C9 Cardinals O’Malley and Maradiaga – men who “see no evil” as it pertains to clerical sodomites behaving badly.
- He published an interim report for Synod 2014 which states, “Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community.”
- He pressed forward with the appointment of Bishop Juan Barros in Chile in spite of the outcry of persons attesting to his homo-deviancy.
- He appointed LGBT activist Fr. James Martin a consultor to the Vatican’s Secretariat for Communications.
In the interest of space, I will stop here.
In short, from the earliest days of his occupation of Rome, Francis has been making it crystal clear that he does not intend to pose a threat of any kind to clerical homo-deviants, be they in the Vatican or elsewhere; in fact, he has elevated them to positions of power and prestige.
Was this perhaps part of the deal that put him there in the first place?
Benedict, for his part, stated in his 2016 memoir, Last Testament, that he was aware of a Vatican “gay lobby” that was made up of four or five people, but that he managed to break the group up during his pontificate.
Right! Persons who live and work in the Roman Curia most certainly know better. Are there none who love the Church enough to speak up?
Perhaps a better question to ask is whether or not there are any men in the Curia who are not fearful of being blackmailed, or worse. As I’ve stated in this space a number of times, it seems rather likely that the homo lobby had a hand in convincing Benedict to step aside.
In any case, the message sent via Benedict’s ludicrous claim of a tiny, disbanded gay lobby is clear; no threat to the lavender mafia will be forthcoming from him either.
In his pathetic letter on the homo-clerical crisis of 20 August, Francis spoke numerous times of a need for openness. OK then, let’s have some openness, shall we.
Where is that dossier, and, more importantly, what does it contain?
Of course, neither the Heretic nor the Abdicator will provide answers to these eminently timely and important questions, but does anyone with access to the Unholy See Press Office – clerical or lay – have the guts to even ask?
It is doubtful indeed, but let us not forget that Frank ‘n Beans are not the only persons with firsthand knowledge of the dossier’s contents. Its authors – Cardinals Julián Herranz, Salvatore De Giorgi, and Jozef Tomko – also know what the dossier reveals; in fact, each one may even have a copy of his very own.
Given the present state of affairs in the Church (no pun intended), these cardinals should also be pressed to reveal, in the purifying light of truth, the putridness that they uncovered.
Doing so may perhaps shed light, not only on the homo-clerical crisis, but on the mysterious circumstances surrounding Benedict’s resignation.
So, exactly where is that dossier, and what does it contain?
Louie, we were talking about this very question at lunch today; it is a bit numbing though, that there are so few of us.
Perhaps Cardinal Burke could be tasked with “hand delivering” this question?
Gee, I thought that question was going to be…..where is Benedict in all of this? But I suspect people think he’s “scared” to speak up. Scared of what? Dying sooner than 92?
Louie, if you recall Benedict’s resignation came shortly after his Butler’s trial.
Said Butler was leaking Vati Secrets to Nuzzi the Italian journalist which was alleged to have contained copies or correspondence that crossed Benedict’s own desk.
Nuzzi subsequently wrote a book on the whole affair along with numerous articles.
The contents of said dossier’s investigation had to do with the three Vatican City banks.
Once he was sitting on the Throne of Peter , Borgolio set up an independent financial panel composed of laymen and a cleric to investigate the money laundering and the Dicastery Cardinal’s perks for their friends and Religious who had accounts in these banks ,especially the IOR that he assigned Ricca to.
I really do not believe there is one shred of evidence that this dossier contained anything other than the ominous financials Vatican City was facing.
The homo collective has been flourishing in Vatican City for a very long time and nothing ever has been done about it. Indeed ,even the deceased ( of P2 fame) Cardinal Poletti’s own secretary who is on the board of the APSA Bank is well known by the name of “Jessica”.
As far as sending Burke with a letter or anything else, that is fruitless. Burke himself was named in the financial investigations, as one Cardinal who had a Vatican owned apartment that he rented well below market price with a staff of six nuns at his beck and call.
Neither Francis or Benedict could get a handle on the deep seated financial corruption that is plaguing the Vatican.
Neither ever stepped up to address the homo heresy itself and probably never will . Because if they did the church as an institution would be left bereft of clergy with few priests left to pass the collection plates in most of the Diocese.
CMtv just exposed the pipeline of S American homosexuals being brought to American seminaries ,but what they missed is the other side of the pipeline which is the pederast grooming clerics America has been sending down there.
“Now you are one of us.”
IMHO the entire premise that Benedict was forced out by the homosexual cabal was a concoction , especially since his own personal secretary (aka Gorgeous George of opus dei) was very much involved in Dolan’s blasphemous Met fashion gala.
Vatican Inc. has been in the red for quite awhile and it is getting worse.
That IS their primary concern. That is their ONLY impetus for action.
“Are there none who love the Church enough to speak up?” That is my question to the SSPX—did I miss it?
My 2 Cents,
Discussing this very same thing with a friend this morning. She has many Catholic contacts as do I .We think either people have given up hope or are just numb about their faith in the Faith now.
One of her “friends” basically said he does not want to read anymore now about the church.
All the rot and modernist self-destruction that has poisoned the Church at Vatican 2 is about to be clearly exposed and explained. Dr Chojnowski will soon publish the completed, irrefutable and scientifically documented Sister Lucy of Fatima imposter hoax…..going on since 1958… Some information is already released. The Lord and/or His Mother are NEVER late…As they say down South…”Hang On to the LugNuts”
Is Jorge himself a sodomite? Is Jorge himself thus subject to blackmail for sodomitical offenses committed (btw, notice that I said “sodomitical offenses committed” rather the the morally neutral, and thus acceptable to worldlings, “homosexual acts done”) in Argentina while rising through the ranks?
Straight men don’t like being surrounded by stinking sodomites.
E. Michael Jones: Why is Sodomy a Shame for Some But Not for Others?
It is A shame for the “some” because it is they that not only know but also practice God’s laws on marriage. These “some” fully know that divorce and contraception, and yes that includes the heresy of NFP is a GRAVE mortal sin.
It is not a shame for the vast majority of the many “others” because they and their parents and great grandparents have been practising contraception for many decades now and are fully imbued with the drinking of the coolaid of the heresy of contraception because of the heresy of NFP and divorce and these many others have fully embrace these sins as venial at most. If we are going to drain the swamp of sodomy of same sex sodomitical perversions in our Church we also have to drain the swamp of sodomy to include the heresy of contraception from the heresy of NFP.
A question re the 300 page dossier given to B16: Is this the dossier prepared by the murdered Father Kunz which was originally given to JP2, who obviously hid it or ignored it? Just wondering.
Ny 2 Cents, most likely no it is not. Fr Kunz worked with RCF and Steve Brady as did Cardinal Gagnon to an extent. Cardinal Gagnon alleged before that, that P JP2 charged him with identifying the Freemasons in the curia and giving him the report. He completed the task but his Vatican office was broken into prior to the appointed meeting to hand over the document. He said he of course made a copy but his appointment with the Pope was cancelled because word got around his offices were burgled.
He then said he tried to make an another appointment but was put off by the Pope’s secretaries.
From my own private conversation with him , he spilled the beans on Fr
Ken Roberts after I pointed out that Roberts belonged to the Knights of St Gregory also when I noticed his own lapel pin. His response was to make a face and ask me how he got into the Knights.
It was raining and my car pulled up and i said goodbye and pondered how uncharitable his words and reaction were. Years later, when the truth about Fr Ken Roberts was made public I realized the Cardinal knew he was a homosexual who hunted young men who were interested in the priesthood.
They all know who is who. The stupid idea that Borgolio was or is in the dark or that Ratzinger was or is , is just that……stupid.
Clerics all gossip more than women on a party line. Pious Catholics better wake up and smell the stinken truth.
A dear priest friend who died recently asked me to find out why several other priests told him his new Bishop whom he never met were telling him the Bishop was spreading rumors about him. He died before i discovered the who whats and whys. The Bishop had just hired the cross dressing priest who had an “extended leave of absence” as his personal secretary. The previous Bishop who died got rid of the cross dresser on the behest of my priest friend………Go through the files and look at who is who. hx Bishops always hire hx personal secretary priests and usually they live in the Bishop’s mansion . Ahem, Wuerl was Wright’s secretary and Zubik was Wuerl’s……..and so on.
Read Randy Engel’s ,”Rite of Sodomy”and look at the patterns.
Then there is Gorgeous George as he is called in Rome.
No Louie, no My 2 Cents, I really do not think that dossier handed to Borgoglio held any clerical surprises other than financial .
It’s gone down the same deep, dark well into which the Third Secret of Fatima was thrown fifty-eight years ago.
Oh bloody hell — I thought TGS had died but there he is. How to get rid of the avatar?
While U R promoting E Michael Jones , perhaps you would like to read about Fr Angles the Jews and Hitler from Jone’s OWN magazine, Alphonse?
Or for anyone else who believes Wiliiamson’s screeds that infected some of the Society priests.
Who cares? Glad you got your computer repaired especially now when so many bishops including the one in Rome they call he Pope, are tap dancing around the graphic clerical abuse angst among the unwashed stinky sheep who are ready to stampede.
Read and discover for yourself . You need to read more Alphonse to understand things better.
I am no fan of Voris but at the end of this video he says one very huge truth……”No priest Bishop or Cardinal ( including the present candidates for the next Papacy and the one Emeritis ) is going to fix this damned mess of Episcopal Sodomy.
I see that was written in 1992 when Jones was still mired in full CatholiCuckery. I bet he’d write that differently now.
As for you, take a break from opining here. Believe it or not, you need not obsessively opine on every post. Return only when you’ve attained a lucid interval.
I have been asking this for the last 5 years.
Whore-hay has to go!
One reads all the time about how popes have been coerced and pressured. The solution is painfully obvious, but no Pope would dream of doing it.
Go to the window at the Angelus, and say: “Cardinal XYZ threatened me today. He said if I didn’t appoint his friend Archbishop QRST a Cardinal, he would see to it that the German conference of bishops would cut off the millions they are sending to the Church in Poland. I am appealing to the world’s Catholics to make up the difference. Oh, and I have laicized Cardinal XYZ and Archbishop QRST.”
Benedict should have published the dossier in L’Osservatore Romano.
The answer to the corruption at the Vatican Bank is equally simple: Abolish it. But no pope or other prelate is capable of thinking that thought.
A man with that kind of spine could never have risen through the post-conciliar ranks. Only squishy faggots and fag sympathizers can rise through the post-conciliar ranks. Let sulfur rain on them all. I’ll be in Rome from Oct. 24 to Nov. 23. I may have a front row seat.
Pre-Conciliar ranks, also.
Actually, Jones’ own views on “the Jewish question” (to put it politely) are pretty close to those of our dear friend AlphonsusJr, except that he couches them in polite language and psychobabble rather than talking like an Internet tough guy. The articles you cited were written by a former contributor to Culture Wars, not by him – and Jones has a funny way of falling out with his contributors for obscure reasons and writing long, Cupich-like letters justifying himself (see also: Voris, Michael; Engel, Randy; Williamson, Richard).
Thinking that Jones has any reasonable answers is like thinking Reiki energy healing can cure cancer. Try Romano Amerio instead.
Yes. All this talk of blackmail here, blackmail there. Of course it exists, but one simple act can blow all of it away.
There are two very different sides to the Jewish story of the twentieth century. Only one is allowed though. Have you looked at the other? It’s eye opening to say the least.
PQ and Alcuck,
Take a look at the article . I’ll wager I have read and experienced first hand far more than you ever have Cuckmeister on both the J question and concerning what B Williamson really thinks and does.
Jones did not write the article , it is authored by someone else who actually stayed in St Mary’s KS, observing and interviewing the people who live there.Fr Angles is Bishop Fellay’s Canon Law advisor and an adroit liar.Angles and Williamson are two peas in a pod.
Jones is connected to Opus dei as Randy demonstrated in her always well documented research and writings.
Re: The Jewish question behind the New Evangelization
Like CMtv ,which is backed by Opus Dei money and EWTN whose broadcast ctr in DC is owned by Opus Dei and geared to reel in Catholic neo conservative and converts , the flip side to reel in evangelicals and more touchy feel good charismatics is “Shalom World”.
It’s ALWAYS about money .
Interestingly one of Borgoglio’s first acts was to try to get a handle Vatican City finances. during this time there was a break in and files were stolen regarding the Vatican Bank, Marcinkus and the Calvi affair.
Shortly afterwards his financial plans were thwarted.
some excellent points made here………
The Final Stage of the Conciliar “Opening to the World”: The World Moves in for the Kill
“Meanwhile, notes Magister, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, “which determines how the finalized conventions are to be applied to member states, including Vatican City, publicly criticized ‘the code of silence’ that blocks ‘under pain of excommunication’ members of the Catholic clergy from reporting to the authorities the abuse that they become aware of in confession. The committee went so far as to order that the Church adjust its code of canon law in this sense, not distinguishing it from the laws of Vatican City State.”
“A human element of the Church that kneels before the world now bares its neck for the executioner’s blade, its own sins providing the pretext for the execution. Such is the final outcome of the “vision” of Maritain and Montini [Paul VI] and all the other conciliar progressives, who deluded themselves into believing that an embrace of the world in the vain hope that it would be won over to the Gospel by friendly blandishments could lead to anything but the apocalyptic situation that now confronts us.
A situation from which only Heaven itself can deliver the Church. Such is the essence of the prophetic admonitions of the Message of Fatima.”
Professor, that crack about Eugene Jones’ drivel being “Cupich-like” was most excellent.
It is also enlightening to see the collapse of the AlphonsusJr + sweepoutthefilth alliance over which despised Jews in the correct manner.
Truly, this combox – and akacatholic as a whole – is one of the most entertaining rabbit-holes I’ve ever encountered. I see why Professor Q frequents it.
Has any even considered, for the sake of argument, that even if Pope St. Pius X, had he been elected in 2005 instead of Benedict he COULD NOT HAVE “cleaned house”? Why? Precisely because the apostasy in the Church was in full blossom, even involving Cardinals and Bishops. Wouldn’t it be stupid to think that those in charge would obey him? And secondly, how is he going to find every Deacon, Priest, Bishop and Cardinal and whoever else, in order to publicize their excommunication in the event that such a move would be made?
For me, it seems reasonable that the enemies of the Church had to be identified, for it is easier to do battle with the enemy when one knows where they are. So WHAT BENEDICT DID WAS TO RETAIN THE PETRINE OFFICE, RENOUNCED THE “EXERCISE” OF THE POWER GOVERNING AND THE POWER OF TEACHING WHILE CONTINUING THE “EXERCISE” OF THE POWER OF SANCTIFYING, and thus retired to Mater Ecclesiae in order to do penance and pray! In this was the enemy would come out of the woodwork and expose themselves. And in this way it is up to the Faithful to say: “Hey, that those apostates are doing is not Catholic and we don’t want anything to do with them; and then the could associate with Benedict who is the true Pope and the Church.
The Visibility of would be sensible again, being that people would have to make a choice: either they are FOR Christ and the True Church or they are with Satan and his apostates. And since the primary element in the Visibility of the Church is the Pope, we MUST recognize that there is an “emperor” without clothes who presents himself as Pope and turn our attention to the True Pope. Furthermore, because social unity, i.e., the unity of the Faithful must first and foremost begin with unity of the True Faith: the integral Unity of Doctrine and Practice, Its Unity with Sacred Scripture, and it’s Unity with the past. And the Church Militant would have the task of watching for and ridding the Church of any apostates who have not sincerely converted.
It is my contention that Benedict made a very courageous and ingenious decision for the Common Good of the Church, but no one seems to realize or want to realize what he did, that God used him as a secondary cause in order to keep Official Power from the hands of Satan, i.e., from those under the control of Satan, and thereby preserved the INDEFECTIBILITY OF THE CHURCH, and kept the promise of Christ to Peter at Caesareae Philippi that “the gates of hell will not prevail over It” from mockery. Please read the following excerpt from the Catholic Encyclopedia:
• “The GIFT OF INDEFECTIBILITY is expressly promised to the Church by Christ, in the words in which He declares that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it…. It is manifest that, could the storms which the Church encounters so shake it as to alter its essential characteristics and make it other than Christ intended it to be, the gates of hell, i.e., the powers of evil, would have prevailed. It is clear, too, that could the Church suffer substantial change, it would no longer be an instrument capable of accomplishing the work for which God called it into being. He established it that it might be to all men the school of holiness. This it would cease to be if ever it would set up a false and corrupt moral standard. He established it to proclaim His revelation to the world, and charged it to warn all men that unless they accepted that message they must perish everlastingly.” …………….
“It was said above that one part of the Church’s gift of indefectibility lies in her preservation from any substantial corruption in the sphere of morals. This supposes, not merely that she will always proclaim the perfect standard of morality bequeathed to her by her Founder, but also that in every age the lives of many of her children will be based on that sublime mode. Only a supernatural principle of spiritual life could bring this about” (The Catholic Encyclopedia 1913, Vol. 3 under ‘Church’ Pg. 756).
I have shown that this is in fact what Benedict did in what I call my “Thesis”, and if anyone is interested, he is welcome to email me with a request at email@example.com. God bless and Our Lady protect you all.
Uno Problemo Fr,
It was Benedict as Ratzinger who penned all those letters from the CDF to Bishops forbidding the defrocking and encouraging the transfers of known pederast and hx predator clerics.
[The function of such posts by the likes of Professor Q and HerveTheBard is A) to virtue signal, and B) to assert their supposed intellectual superiority. Typical CatholiCucks. And though straight, they probably sound like faggots. This too is typical of CatholiCucks. Sad!]
Meanwhile….where is Benedict? Look closely at that picture above “Frdbelland”. He’s in cahoots with “the enemy”. He has done us NO favors.
Ratzinger is just as much a modernist as Bergolio. One still believes in traditional morality and one does not. That is the only difference between Ratzinger and Bergolio. They are both apostate heretics who have signed on to V2 and the NO. Ratzinger even authored the “subsist” heresy. I am tired of all this outrage at Bergolio because he has the audacity to fully implement the goals of Vatican 2.
Why is it in every picture of NO prelates meeting, they are always grinning with their hands all over each other? They can’t keep their hands off each other. Its sickening. Dolan can’t stop laughing like the jackass he is and Bergolio is always feeling someone up.
He IS the enemy. Or shall I say, he SUBSISTS in the enemy to use his parlance.
TomA: “He IS the enemy.”
Resignationists can’t make that jump Tom..,,at least not yet. That’s why I said he was in cahoots with the enemy. But you know I am totally with you.
Because they’re all on board with Shalom World…..
Click on the link , Dolan is there grinning and I recognize one of our former local RC parish actively active sodomite pastors !
There’s a nun there too “Ask the Abbess” I believe posing in a chair like M Angelica. …..
“Peace peace peace , but there will be no peace.”
How does Dolan fit in with the “Master” Cdl Edwin O’Brien?
Another State Diocesan GJ Investigation is planned to begin.
I know you are 2Vt and I’m glad for it.
Dear sweepoutthefilty, could you please document those letters? I want to know title, date, author, and dicastery. Thank you. Furthermore, there are several things of which you commentators are absolutely ignorant and which I could not expect you to be familiar with, for unless one is an investigator, has suffered under such conditions, or is an exorcist it is truly difficult to fathom; and that is the operation of networks controlled by men under the influence of the demonic, whether the Homosexual Lobby, which, next to abortion is Satan’s favorite form of immorality, or the St. Gallen Mafia, which if not directly involved in homosexuality desires to destroy the Church by it. And don’t tell me you indeed understand, because everything you say indicates that you are ignorant of those operations. The scenario in the Church today is not one that can be found in textbooks, in history, really in any media because it is absolutely unique to our age. Secondly, I spent four years studying in Rome and have at least some idea of Roman Diplomacy in which those involved in the Government of the Vatican are strictly trained. And again you show yourself ignorant of those practices. You you pontificate almost as if you’re God about the intentions and motives of anyone you don’t like. Unfortunately, the nature of the Internet where every Tom, Dick and Harry can say practically whatever they want without being challenged, but even being regarded as an “expert” in any area they want to criticize. Actually, I find it disgusting. God bless and Our Lady protect you in these most confusing times.
Dear Tom A, with the certitude of a Ph.D., which I’m sure are not, you pontificate how Benedict is an enemy of the Church. Here you show your ignorance for by your very reply you show that you haven’t read COMMENTARY ON THE DOCUMENT [Lumen Gentium] RESPONSES TO SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE DOCTRINE ON THE CHURCH. Why don’t you do your research before you stick your foot in your mouth next time. God bless.
Fr Belland ,with all due respect , you do not know me nor what or whom I know and have known for many years.
I would suggest you read about the Fr Kiesel Case and the CA Bishop who presented three letters from Cdl Ratzinger in his defense in court .The letters denied him his repeated request to defrock the known pederast and directed him to transfer him instead ,”For the good of the Church” and “…..because he is young”
If your angst with me rests on what I have stated about Bishop Williamson or Fr Angles , we will never meet the gulf between our opinions.
If you are angry because I stated priests are not an Alter Christi at all times during the course of a day , I stand firmly by that .
Aside from that , I have no idea what you speak of in your accusatory and immature broad condemnations .
Fr Belland ,
You asked for some documentations. I actually read the report on the court case itself. I provide this link to you but as far as the court documents you will have to either research it on a Law site or ask a lawyer to retrieve a copy of the actual Case. I presume you know how to do this yourself since you penned a Thesis for which you must have done some research of your own.
Fr ,I found this condescending statement below rather presumptuous on your part .
“for unless one is an investigator, has suffered under such conditions”
As far as the laity unaware of what has really goes on, might I suggest “The Rite of Sodomy” by Randy Engel. A dear friend of mine for about thirty years.”The McHugh Chronicles” a Bishop I knew far too well and “The Cipolla Case”, written by Randy after I found the victims involved, hoping to set the record straight.
I have been paid for doing research Fr and I have also suffered as has my family and close friends including great priests I was fortunate to have close friendships with , all thanks to several Bishops and plethora of sodomite pompous pride filled clerics.
“Again in 1982 Bishop Cummins wrote Card. Ratzinger pleading for the defrocking to avoid “scandal.” Subsequently three more letters were sent to the Cardinal to check on the status of the Kiesle case. Ratzinger remained silent through the years. However a Vatican official wrote to say the file might have been lost and suggested the materials be resubmitted. Finally in 1985 Ratzinger sent the now famous (or infamous) letter with the decision to delay the defrocking. Only in 1987 Kiesle was defrocked. ”
“The “matter” at hand is a convicted child molester of innocent boys by a hopelessly maniac priest. It is impossible to reconcile the Ratzinger letter with not giving the boot to Kiesle, “a remorseless sociopath.” Instead, Kiesle was kept aboard in the very Diocese in which he was committing his crimes.”
Now with your extensive time in Rome and your PhD, I should also inform you I have a friend whose son is a priest in good standing and studied there also for his second PhD. He decided to return and finish his second Doctorate at the Catholic University of America.
His own reasoning was that living in Rome posed a more serious threat to his Faith and to his soul and body than actually studying here.
Post above,” I spent four years studying in Rome and have at least some idea of Roman Diplomacy in which those involved in the Government of the Vatican are strictly trained.” They are failing miserably Father……
They had to put that diplomacy into practice here !
and it is going to get even more difficult after there are Grand Jury Investigations in more states are made public.
@Herve: Well, I calls them as I sees them. ^_^
Of course there are more sides to “the Jewish Question” than what is in official history books. After all, history books are a blend of fact and myth most of the time. However, that does not mean the version peddled by Fake Alphonsus is true either. Both sides could profit from (a) studying Church history, and more specifically (b) reading Pope Pius XI’s excellent “Mit Brennender Sorge” which would give them all a most-unpleasant wake-up call. But of course, it’s easier to sound edgy and echo (non-Catholic) “white nationalist” bloggers than actually read what the Church has to say on this question, isn’t it?
One could, in full seriousness, construct a totally credible theory that Williamson and his acolytes, especially YouTube cowards like Fake Alphie, are actually a fifth column meant to make Traditionally-minded Catholics look like idiots by tying them to the ctrl-alt-del-right…. =)
Frdbelland, what we know with certitude is the Faith as it was taught prior to 1958 IS the Catholic Faith. Thanks to men like Ratzinger and other men of the Council, we are now left with ambiguities about the Faith. It does not take a PhD to understand that a New Mass, new Code of Canon Law, new Cathecism, New Evangelization, new ecumenism, new saints, and new devotions equals a new religion, a new faith, and a new church. It follows that one of the men most responsible for the introduction of doubts and ambiguities into the Church is not a defender of the Faith as taught prior to 1958, which is the the true Faith as handed down by the Apostles from Our Lord Himself. This True Faith was unblemished for Centuries until man centered men like Ratzinger destroyed the Church with their novelties and innovations.
TomA: Given his defense of Vatican II, I suspect that “Frdbelland” is a Modernist himself, and, if a “Fr”, ordained in the New Rite.
“So WHAT BENEDICT DID WAS TO RETAIN THE PETRINE OFFICE, RENOUNCED THE “EXERCISE” OF THE POWER GOVERNING AND THE POWER OF TEACHING WHILE CONTINUING THE “EXERCISE” OF THE POWER OF SANCTIFYING,”
So, he’s part pope? Please share (Catholic) Church teaching that allows for a man to be pope but not govern nor teach the Church.
Who penned the 300 word dossier and who handed it to B16? Did anyone else read it? Does anyone know the answers to these questions? Thank you.
Yes 2VT, I forgot to mention new rites for a new priesthood for new sacraments. The modernists left no aspect of the True Faith, its Liturgy, and disciplines unmarred. They sullied all they touched with their modernist innovations.
My 2 Cents, the answer to your question is “no” .
But there may be some clues amid the VatiLeaks scandal.
Benedict’s Butler, was tried in Vatican city for handing over documents to the Italian reporter , the other accomplices also were tried in the Vatican City court. The Butler was given leniency and other employment in the City State.
I believe it was considered he was acting in the interest of and concern for the Pope , despite his actions being those of a criminal nature.
“The books by Nuzzi, Merchants in the Temple, and Fittipaldi, Avarice, alleged widespread financial mismanagement and waste at the heart of the Catholic church. The journalists exposed the workings of a Vatican commission set up in 2013 to advise Pope Francis on reforming the Vatican bureaucracy. ” “The work of Fittipaldi and Nuzzi is regarded has having already had a positive impact on Vatican policy. They exposed a lack of accounting in the sainthood process, which could cost hundreds of thousands of pounds a time. In March, the pope tightened controls on the path to canonisation, ordering more stringent bookkeeping and greater supervision during staff investigations into whether a person qualifies for saint status.”
“Balda has been in custody since November, although he has recently been allowed out on day release. He will have three days to appeal against the verdict, although he could put his hopes in a papal pardon.
The priest’s conviction came four years after the first Vatileaks scandal, in which Nuzzi published the private correspondence of Pope Benedict XVI. The pope’s butler, Paolo Gabriele, was jailed in October 2012 after he admitted having handed over the secret documents. Gabriele claimed he acted out of love for the Catholic church and the pope, who pardoned him after two months in prison.”
Nuzzi’s book was extremely interesting as it gave a detailed and documented account of who ran the various Vatican Dicasteries , the rampant free for all of cronyism and extreme lack of financial accountability.
The reports were similar to the more recent reporting on Diocesan embezzlement scandals here in the US perpetrated by known homosexual clerics.
Dear Fr Belland .
I am assuming this is you in the picture of the gradating class under Bishop Williamson’s tutelage .
As you are pictured in the graduating class with Fr Urrutigoity and Fr Hewko , I can well understand your presence here in attacking some of the posters myself included.
Have you also joined the Resistance MC or the so called Fake Resistance ?
My impression from your own posting is that you have not and are well within the camp of the recent Superior General having been fully on board and indoctrinated with the plan for a SSPX Prelature under Pope Francis.
The link you referenced is not in your post. Please provide it so we can all see what you are talking about.
Herve, I believe it is but here it is again.
Dear Fr Belland, this blog has become the sweep sweep sweep show.There was a time when commenters came here to edify and support one another, not so these days. MS Sweep reads all and knows all the right people and I do believe she does know a number of Catholic notables, unfortunately she often forgets that she need not characterize each commenter that does not agree with her perspective as an infiltrator bent on deceiving. I for one found your statement very enlightening. Thank you Father for your wisdom and your holy priesthood. May Our Lady keep you under Her mantle of purity and protection against attacks of satan
Theresa . I don’t believe I have done this.”she need not characterize each commenter that does not agree with her perspective as an infiltrator bent on deceiving.”
I try to be direct in my responses and add links to clarify the information I post.
It’s likely that Francis himself is a sodomite. Blackmail goes hand-in-hand with the homo-heresy. It’s how they are able to hold such sway. I believe that Benedict was blackmailed into abdicating. His abdication may also have had something to do with him not being able to bring the SSPX into full reconciliation with the conciliar church. He abdicated about six weeks after the announcement was made that the SSPX would not be reaching a deal after all. That dossier definitely had a great deal to do with his abdication though. The fags were and still are in control in the Vatican.
This is a link to another blog. It is not evidence. Sorry, I don’t believe you. Most of your links are not evidence of anything, just other blogs that publish rumours and speculation.
I appreciate your explanation above. But I do have a question. Do you believe that there’s such a thing as the conciliar church? Archbishop Lefebvre said that the Catholic Church is occupied by a Modernist sect. This is not to say that the Catholic Church has defected, but rather that the Church is occupied, and therefore not able to maintain her mission properly.
The homo-heresy is very important, but it’s also important to note that if Modernism had not infiltrated the Church ever 100 years ago, we might not be in the mess we’re in now.
Caimbuel: “This is not to say that the Catholic Church has defected, but rather that the Church is occupied, and therefore NOT ABLE TO MAINTAIN HER MISSION properly.”
Sounds like a defected church to me.
Maybe these sources will help you out Herve.
Diocese of Oakland Apology Services 2004; Cardinal Ratzinger letter re Laicization Request 10.31.85; LA Times 01.03.03; LA Times 06.29.03; Mercury News 01.04.04; Oakland Tribune 02.01.04; Oakland Tribune 07.16.04; San Jose Mercury News 03.30.08; San Jose Mercury News 03.31.08; Bay Area News Group 04.01.08; Contra Costa Times 04.01.08; San Jose Mercury News 04.02.08; In York 04.09.10; LA Times 04.09.10; NY Times 04.09.10; Fresno Bee 01.15.17
Mercury News 4.9.10 (add’l article); LA Times 4.9.10 (add’l article); Santa Cruz Sentinel 4.9.10 (Timeline); Oakland Tribune 8.18.10 (add’l article); News 10 2.12.13 (add’l article); BA.org Assignment Record
You can connect to the links in the far right hand column of Kiesel’s record.
Fr David Belland’s background is listed here.
I’ve just re-read St. Louis de Montfort’s priceless “Wisdom of Silence.” After this message, I shall again retire into silence.
It’s critical that you join me, as we’ve both proven unable to control our tongues (or fingers). Scroll down here to find #23, “Wisdom of Silence”:
This is the last time I’ll remind you of this. You’ll be reminded of it again at your judgment.
“And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is placed among our members, which defileth the whole body, and inflameth the wheel of our nativity, being set on fire by hell.”
“But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment. 37For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”
Here Herve is Benedict’s entertaining truth about how he feels about defrocking a rabid admitted child molesting priest.
Text of Letter from Future Pope Benedict Resisting Defrocking California Priest
April 9, 2010
“Following is the text of a November 1985 letter in Latin signed by then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to Oakland Bishop John S. Cummins. It was translated for The Associated Press by Thomas Habinek, chairman of the University of Southern California Classics Department.
Most Excellent Bishop
Having received your letter of September 13 of this year, regarding the matter of the removal from all priestly burdens pertaining to Rev. Stephen Miller Kiesle in your diocese, it is my duty to share with you the following:
This court, although it regards the arguments presented in favor of removal in this case to be of grave significance, nevertheless deems it necessary to consider the good of the Universal Church together with that of the petitioner, and it is also unable to make light of the detriment that granting the dispensation can provoke with the community of Christ’s faithful, particularly regarding the young age of the petitioner.
It is necessary for this Congregation to submit incidents of this sort to very careful consideration, which necessitates a longer period of time.
In the meantime your Excellency must not fail to provide the petitioner with as much paternal care as possible and in addition to explain to same the rationale of this court, which is accustomed to proceed keeping the common good especially before its eyes.
Let me take this occasion to convey sentiments of the highest regard always to you.
Your most Reverend Excellency
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger”
I am happy you find all of this entertaining and will pray for you if you have any children of your own.
Alphonse, enough of your pious self righteous platitutdes!
Contemplate your own navel by yourself.
Silence is what created this crisis of homosexual clerics climbing to the top of the Church and installing there own ,not only to drive away decent men with real vocations , but to undermine everything Catholic at Vatican Two and beyond to the present state of the church mess plastered all over the world for all to see.
To a sedevacantist, it is assumed that the Church has defected.
To an R&Rer it is assumed that teaching heresy is not a defection. If the conciliar church has not defected, then why do you resist Her?
Oh no. It is assumed by anti-sedevacantists that sedevacantists assume the Church has defected.
Caimbeul…how about you respond to your assertion that if the Church is no longer able to maintain her mission (to save souls) that She has NOT defected. How is that possible? And where is does the Church teach that this is even possible?
2Vt, RRers like sedes both admit that there has been a terrible crisis. RRers, however, like to tell us that this crisis and error can come from Holy Mother Church. It is actually blasphemy to say Holy Mother Church can give us false doctrines and a false mass that can harm our faith. But they do it everytime.
“The man that with a stiff neck despiseth him that reproveth him, shall suddenly be destroyed: and health shall not follow him.”
Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos teaches that to say that the Catholic Church can be tarnished with error is a blasphemy. Yet so many traddies today claim a defective Church. How sad.
Dear Tom A, what I say here applies to many of your comrades. It seems that you guys/gals? (gals like to hide behind “filthy”? names) have all been to AA (Alcoholics Anonymous started by Catholics BTW), which believes that alcoholism is a disease that can’t be cured. And in fact, the solution that AA provides prevents any kind of a cure for those poor alcoholics. But as one psychologist told me no one buys a disease off the grocery shelf. So what happens? AA only TRANSFERS the problem, i.e, dependence on the bottle, to dependence on the group sessions, where the “sick” patient acquire other “diseases” such as complaining, tattling, calumniating, swearing, etc., things which they may or may not have contracted, but in any case they are exacerbated.
No attempt is made to make use of the Sacraments, prayer and penance in order to overcome a moral problem. Such is the attitude so many of you so called traditionalists have. You presuppose that once a modernist always a modernist, once murderer always a murderer. What makes matters worse is that you yourselves have the attitude that you’re already saved because you’ve “professed traditionalism” and thus are going straight to heaven. With such an attitude one’s prayers ARE NOT HEARD. Keep up that AA attitude, which is in effect an indirect denial of the power of grace, and you will end up in a pretty hot place eternally.
No Frdbelland, I want to be certain that the sacraments I recieve are actual sacraments. Sorry if Im not accepting the NO sacraments validity based on the fact that Montini and other modernists say they are valid. We have been lied to by those who are suppose to be our shepards for decades. I am not talking about the side show going on now with the sodomites. I am talking about the modernists and the fact that folks like you are telling folks like me that I should trust them when it comes to the sacraments. Well I don’t trust them so therefore I don’t trust their sacraments either.
Dear Mr. dbelland,
You speak of, “certitude”, as though that is what a “Ph.D.” immanently supplies for you. That is an interesting formulation of your thought, which bespeaks your utter misunderstanding of just what, “certitude”, is and yet you posit that you hold a doctorate in philosophy. Philosophy of what? Yours’ is certainly not an Aristotelian-Thomistic foundation in philosophy as that foundation necessary for proper theological grounding, and as per Pope Saint Pius X, who said anyone in the Church who is not grounded in Thomism, is at grave risk for error, as you demonstrate for us, as your pride speaks, as res ipsa loquitur. Please pray for us dear Saint Pope Pius X. The proper understanding of, “certitude”, is rooted in the proper understanding of judgment, as in the spiritual operations of the intellect and will. There is certitude, opinion, and doubt. As these are movements of the intellect and will, what could they possibly have to do with holding a “Ph.D.”? You speak of “Lumen Gentium”. Nowhere else in the litany of the false council documents can one find such utterly blasphemous heresy, as in the tacit denial of the Apostles Creed, as a tacit denial of our Blessed Triune Godhead, and as the denial of the very divinity of Jesus the Christ, Son of the Living God, as God Himself, as in Lumen Gentium 16. This very blasphemous heresy is precisely why you can only be, Mr. dbelland and not, “Father”, and this reality as truth, we must all know with “certitude”, as to deny this objective reality, is indeed to be outside the true Mystical Body of Christ, His Bride, the Church, a place where there simply is no salvation, deFide. I earnestly pray this helps, as your very salvation hangs in the balance. In caritas.
The link you provided (https://fox4kc.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-us-church-abuse-text,0,1941279.story) says “Oops! That page can’t be found.”
Here is an article about the letter you are referencing: https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-47591420100410
As you claim the queen bee Catholic crown, I have to ask: what’s with that “pray for you if you have any children of your own” bullshit remark you directed at me? A threat? Just being generically bitchingly condescending?
I don’t have kids, but family is extremely important to me. You need to check yourself right now and stop shitposting, right here, right now, and get back to actual theological debate.
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.”
I’ve been reading this blog for a long time, I sign up for an accoubt, this lunatic “sweepoutthefilth” attacks me for disagreeing with her bullshit, I’m shunned.
I’m glad I didn’t get a subscription to the Inauisitor. If “sweepoutthefilth” and “AlphonseJr” are the Church, I want no part of it.
Herve I read your comments above and actually directed you to multiple news links on bishopaccountability on now ex Fr Steven Kiesel which included Ratzinger’s own signed letter refusing to defrock the admitted serial pederast at the Bishops request.. I cannot help it if you do not read and comprehend directions.
I am overwhelmed by your charitable response to my efforts to assist in your understanding of the incident.
Indeed dominated by one know it all- everything blogger. Why dont they start their own. Cant bear to read this anymore. I am outta here. A place that is an occassion of sin with continual tale bearing, calumny and detraction
Lord have mercy on us ALL!
P.S .. SOTF havent you cottoned on to who Herve is ????
It is always a Blunder to think there was ever an “alliance”.
This isn’t high school groupie time. I thought it was a place to post serious thought on the present crisis we face as Catholics.
Personally I am heartbroken for the victims of the pervasive clerical homosexual culture within the church and have been for over thirty years. Not only for the families of youth but also for the loss of decent men with vocations.
As far as Fr Belland’s thesis exonerating Benedict’s exit,
Fr Belland ,Peter died for the Church , Benedict jumped ship.
I am sad to say I have known too many good men like the one who wrote this letter.
“No attempt is made to make use of the Sacraments, prayer and penance in order to overcome a moral problem. Such is the attitude so many of you so called traditionalists have….What makes matters worse is that you yourselves have the attitude that you’re already saved because you’ve “professed traditionalism” and thus are going straight to heaven. ”
Exactly who is doing the calumniating again?
According to link Sweep provided, Father Belland is a “Priest from a Minnesota diocese, probably Minneapolis/St. Paul. He looked about 50 yrs old in 5-99. “Ordained” in the Novus Ordo in 1987 and was still under his conciliar bishop in 5-99. Fr. Belland told Catholic Candle unequivocally that he was conditionally re-ordained by Bishop Williamson”
This is confusing, Sweep. The link you provided in an earlier post showed a picture of “Frdbelland” with Bishop Williamson in 1995. So, is the conclusion here that Frdbelland returned to the diocese after being conditionally re-ordained by Bishop Williamson and is currently a diocesan (AKA Novus Ordo) priest? That’s how I’m reading this.
Oh please, commenters are not the reason you didn’t get a sub to the Inquisitor. You’re either really broke, extremely cheap, or would have never gotten a sub because you’re not down with LV’s direction of the paper. Very few commentors write for the paper. If anything, the paper is a place to go to avoid rash commentors.
For All Those Running Around with Their Heads on Fire over the Clerical Scandals
Aug 20, 2018 Brother André Marie
Bravo Rev Father. The protestant/gnostics here are not worthy of you. Christ has not deserted His Church, just as God didn’t desert the Israelites with all their perfidy and faithlessness.
Yes the Church is in a terrible place, which is the permissive will of Almighty God, and as John Paul I said at the time he ascended the papacy, when you see your mother so afflicted, you want to love her even more.
I don’t know if you are aware of a book called, In Sinu Jesu, written by a Benedictine monk (now abbot of his own order in Ireland) revealing his dialogue with Christ. Christ mentions the sacrifice that Benedict XVI is making, saying this well before his ‘abdication’, but has nothing to say about Francis at all. This fits your thesis well.
Beware of the vipers that hang out on this blog!
I see that you have posted a query about Fr. Belland on the CathInfo forum, in order to find out more about him.
It’s rather sad that when challenged, sedevacantists have to resort to a witch hunt toward those who challenge them. So typical of sede behavior.
Yup, thats us kooky sedes, always insisting that the Sacraments are truly valid. And we are again kooky for not trusting modernists. So typical of us sedes.
Perhaps McCarrick (Say, where is he?) is reading it and humming “Thanks for the memories” while doing so
From Poland, The only problem with Bro Andre’s article is that the AG brings in witnesses who are still alive and willing to testify before the GJ Investigatory body. Therefore, if Fr X just says something catty about Fr Y and is not willing to testify ,or has not reported the abuse to proper legal authorities it does not make the grade to be cited by the GJ.
In other words, the clerical authority or accuser who is just getting even would need to scout up victim willing to testify to the abuse or have reported the offense already to the police himself and have a record on it.
The AG does not just go willy nilly posting unsubstantiated he did she did or he said she said.
It is too easy for some to say to say the Jews made me contracept or it is all the fault of “Modernism” in the world and the church.
Like ,’The woman made me eat the apple.”
You know Brain Surgeon, if Catholics only paid some attention a long time ago they might not be in shock mode now. Very recently you praised your wonderful Bishop Barbarito , if ONLY you had read about his background in the Rite of sodomy by Randy Engel , you might even now have had a clue.
I wonder how many Catholics sspx adherents or otherwise , wrote letters or voiced their objections to their Bishops way back when?
How is it possible to trust anyone totally when we can no longer trust what was once Holy Mother Church?
@my2cents…..’when we can no longer trust what was once Holy Mother Church…..’
This is a call of despair, one who’s heart has lost faith, or rather, Trust in God.
My suggestion to you is to please read Church history, very quickly you will understand that as much as the Holy Mother Church has been under a constant attack of the enemy from every front, suffering in every century, ‘she’ has not only survived but managed to flourish…..as ‘she’ will continue to do until the end of time.
THE CHURCH, AFTER ALL, IS CHRIST IN THE WORLD, AND HE WILL NOT BE VANGUISHED!!!
FOR SHE IS THE GLORY, THE SHAME, AND THE ONLY HOPE FOR MANKIND!
I have the book “In Sinu Jesu” but have not yet read it. Please let me know on what page Jesus said this to the Benedictine monk.
Dear Paul, I really do appreciate the brave defense you make. I say brave because you do it among peers, which takes the courage of a real man. Secondly, you have the proper attitude toward Christ’s Church, a truly genuine love for Holy Mother Church. Please keep close to Our Lord and Our Lady in order to maintain that love and correct understanding of what is happening within the Church.
Concerning the book In Sinu Jesu, I was aware of its existence, but have not read it. However, from what you have said about it, I am very interested and will put it on my “books to order” list. Thanks for mentioning it. May God bless and Our Lady protect you and yours always. Fr. Belland.
Dear Caimbeul, you are absolutely correct when you say “This is not to say that the Catholic Church has defected, but rather that it is occupied….” For anyone to object to this statement is to blaspheme, for one, in a sense, pokes fun–to say the least, at the promise of Christ to Peter at Caesareae Philippi that “the gates of hell shall not prevail over it”. That is, the Catholic Church will NEVER FAIL/DEFECT, which comes from the Latin very “Deficere”, meaning to fail, to forsake, to be lacking, to be deficient.
It should be added here as well that you are correct, Caimbuel, in saying that “if Modernism had not infiltrated the Church ever 100 years ago, we might not be in the mess we’re in now.” Here is what Pope Pius Said in his Encyclical on Modernism:
“And now with Our eyes fixed upon the whole system, no one will be surprised that We should define it to the synthesis of all heresies. Undoubtedly, were anyone to attempt the task of collecting together all the errors that have been broached against the faith and to concentrate into one the sap and substance of them all, he could not succeed in doing so better than the Modernists have done. Nay, they have gone further than this, for, as We have already intimated, their system means the DESTRUCTION NOT OF THE CATHOLIC RELIGION
ALONE, BUT OF ALL RELIGION.”
And without any external religious bearings the ultimate end is to worship themselves, the result of which can be found in St. Paul’t letter to the Romans, Chapter one, and homosexuality is one of the results. Great work Caimbuel, keep it up and don’t let all those know-it-alls frighten you one bit. They only emit hot air.
Ursula I don’t have it to hand but it is in the first half. Read the book for all its beauty. The interesting thing about the Benedictine community that the Monk was part of and the priory that he founded is that it is truly traditional.
Thank you, FromPoland. What you say is correct. However, my comment was more accurately concerning those in the hierarchy who no longer deserve our trust. I do not despair that Our Lord’s Church has been defeated. He is the Invisible Head and the True Catholic Church is His Bride. I have no trust in Our Lord’s enemies who think they will conquer. They won’t. I appreciate the opportunity to make myself clear.
That monk is Dom Mark Kirby, prior of Silverstream Priory in Stamullen, County Meath, Ireland, set up about six years ago. He left Tulsa Oklahoma to set up the new house in Ireland. There is only one other priest ordained so far, Fr Benedict, whose ordination I attended about three years ago.
Dear My 2 Cents, Youre clear as always in your love of God and His Holy Church. We turn away from Francis and other open stubborn apostates and heretics who attack God and the Holy Faith and fundamental moral laws; constantly drawing souls into mortal sin and away from the Holy Faith, towards damnation. We shield our children and all whom they imperil. We offer up our terrible suffering for repentance and conversion, and the end of this unspeakable Great Apostasy.
Actually Caimbul, I posed the question to those who probably know more about him (ie. those in the Resistance) and thought it was best for me to ask those who know him rather than make rash judgments…you know, kinda like you do with sedes?
I find it fascinating that the anti-sedes actually do what they accuse sedes of doing almost every.single.time. I hope those who keep an open mind take note.
Frdbelland, I see that you and Caimbeul still haven’t responded to my questions. Too busy throwing calumny and ad hominems around, huh? Readers: take note.
Thank you, Lynda and well said!
Ezekiel 34 Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)
34 And the word of the Lord came to me, saying:
2 Son of man, prophesy concerning the shepherds of Israel: prophesy, and say to the shepherds: Thus saith the Lord God: Woe to the shepherds of Israel, that fed themselves: should not the flocks be fed by the shepherds?
3 You ate the milk, and you clothed yourselves with the wool, and you killed that which was fat: but my flock you did not feed.
4 The weak you have not strengthened, and that which was sick you have not healed, that which was broken you have not bound up, and that which was driven away you have not brought again, neither have you sought that which was lost: but you ruled over them with rigour, and with a high hand.
5 And my sheep were scattered, because there was no shepherd: and they became the prey of all the beasts of the field, and were scattered.
6 My sheep have wandered in every mountain, and in every high hill: and my flocks were scattered upon the face of the earth, and there was none that sought them, there was none, I say, that sought them.
@my2cents…. I have no trust in Our Lord’s enemies who think they will conquer….IF THAT WAS ONLY POSSIBLE.
No one could deny that the Church is facing a crisis. But that’s nothing new. If we’ve learned anything from the past two thousand years, it’s that the Church is always facing a crisis.
The Arians have faded into history.
The High Middle ages, heresies foolishly predicted the end of the Church, instead, it brought forth some of the greatest theologians and the greatest mystics.
In the Renaissance, paganism threatened to reduce the Church to a crusty old irrelevance, instead, the same age saw an a growth of the church in all four corners of the world.
The French Revolution, and the secularist revolutions throughout Europe in the 1800’s, took away the temporal power of the Church and threatened to dig a grave for ‘her’ total extinction, instead, there was a great religious revival all over the world.
The Communists ruled half of Europe and most of Asia for half a century, and it may seemed that the Church was wiped out in both continents. Instead, the Church remains, still saving souls.
Now, the worst enemy ‘within’ still predicts the end of the Church…….if only that was possible! For Christ’s promise is still good: He is always with His Church, ‘to the end of the age’ (Matt 28:20)…..The Church will find new energy, the legions of faithful will stay true to what the Church always was, and always taught from the time of the Apostles…… the centuries prove it, and her martyrs still die for this God given Faith.
May God bless all soldiers of Jesus Christ!
Omnia Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam!
Vivat Christus Rex!
The three cardinals commissioned by Pope Benedict to produce the report are named in this article by Hilary White after the pope announced his resignation of the office.
My 2 Cents, God is allowing the evil to be exposed. That is the first thing you have to do when you begin to clean . you have to see the dirt before you can clean it. Trust in God above everything else !
Malachi Martin Once impressed on me that the Secretary of State is the most powerful position in the Vatican.
Sodano , Bertone and Parolin ………Sodano is said to be mafia connected through his friendship with Follieri Sr. He kept Maciel in place as long as he could. He took bribes from the Legion of Christ…….Bertone his hand picked replacement purchased a block of apartments in Rome with the largest gay bath house in Italy ( also along with Sodano handled the release of the so called Third Secret).
Now read the text our former Papal Nuncio Archbishop Vagano released. Then tell me if you don’t see the Hand of God at work?
Pray the Rosary daily and read the Word of God !
@ Vermont ,I really have no idea what his story is aside from what has been posted online.
I did receive a call after someone red my posts here and they told me about another priest on Catholic candle listed as in the SSPX now.
The couple who called said they recognized one priest who had been in their NO Diocese and con celebrated a Diocesan Latin Mass . He worked for a Diocesan school and they wanted him to leave which is when he went and joined the SSPX. They said the people at the school really wanted him gone but they did not know why.
Maybe he will answer you 2 Vermont because I do not know.
Here we go again! Cardinal Vigano, The Next Great White Hope (after dubia cardinals have faded out) of the Catholic Church who has same exact aspirations as Dubia Cardinals and that is to bash and blame Pope Francis for everything wrong with the Church while endlessly covering for and praising the two previous Popes before him despite their numerous so-called “mistakes” (a term I’ve heard Cardinal Burke use) that got us in this mess to begin with. Its beyond belief how bloggers act like Vigano’s the guy that’s going to save the Church. You would think they might take a few seconds to check Vigano’s record, it’s so simple these days with the internet, before giving people such false high hopes. Yup, this is the “Great White Hope” Cardinal that’s demanding Pope Francis step down as Pope because of his cover-ups. https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/memo-vatican-nuncio-quashed-sexual-misconduct-inquiry-archbishop-nienstedt
Oh so sorry Fr Belland ,apparently ArchBishop and former Papal Nucio is also committing calumny like I am?
We should keep all these facts secret like the Bishops who paid victims of sodomite rape off with secrecy clauses?
No Father Belland when the sheep themselves have been smite and scattered and do not know what priest to trust for the Sacraments ,the TRUTH has to come out for safety of soul ,mind and body.
There is a huge difference between “calumny” and speaking out in real bodily and spiritual fear for ones self , family and community in Christ Jesus.
Randy and I agree there is a story behind the story above Johnbilbee .
I have no doubt she will be on it. I was reminding her that I recalled ArchBishp Vigano felt Bertone was punishing him by sending him out of Vatican City after this.
“Vigano worked in the Curia before being moved to Washington by then Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone over his own objections. Vigano believed he was being punished by Bertone for informing Pope Benedict of rampant corruption in the Curia. With this statement today, Vigano declares open warfare at the highest levels of the Roman Catholic Church”
I remembered thinking he was a decent man because of that and because a friend told me he had invited Fr Trenham to speak at the Nunciature on this topic.
I think this is all a step in the right direction to sweepoutthefilth.
Did you read the document? In truth, myself I don’t even really care about Vigano’s scandalous cover-up in the past as much as his unnecessary and numerous, “decent” mentions of PJPII in his document as if PJPII is in some kind of contrast to Pope Francis. It sounds like that’s what you believe also and although I know most people, apparently like yourself, are no longer aware and have accepted sins against the first commandment without blinking an eye its mostly because previous popes have already destroyed that commandment not Francis.
So as far as I’m concerned there’s really nothing Pope Francis could do in a million years to top the damage already done by them and actually handed on to him. I mean when the 1st Commandment has already been totally destroyed might as well move on to the other ones which is only what Pope Francis has to work with. That’s easy once the most important commandment has already been eliminated.
And based on Cardinal Vigano’s document and your comments you both (and almost everyone else in the world except the abuse victims) still seem to be in constant denial of this other “story behind the story” : http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2010/03_04/2010_04_04_Pancevski_JohnPaul.htm
Amen johnbilbee. When I saw this, all I could think is that these folks who pin it all on Francis either just don’t get it or don’t want to get it. I pray for them every day to come to the Truth about the Novus Ordo/Vatican II church…and leave it.
You could not be MORE WRONG Johnbilbee !
I left the Nervous Ordo in 1977-78 for a Catholic Eastern Rite !
I also knew at age 13 that things were being turned upside down by what was being planned at the Council and argued the same with my pastor who taught our classroom religion class to the point that he called my home demanding to know what I was reading. I paid a price for speaking out even then.
But I also know that the Vatican Swamp has to be drained of the corruption of greed and sexual vice before and real change can occur. Decent men in the Church have to become empowered to speak out.
You people need to know when to thank God for His intervention !
This is not only stupid but a rash judgement on your part !
” It sounds like that’s what you believe also and although I know most people, apparently like yourself, are no longer aware and have accepted sins against the first commandment without blinking an eye its mostly because previous popes have already destroyed that commandment not Francis.”
Unfortunately sweep, the Eastern Rite is in communion with the Novus Ordo church. Although some parishes may seem to be a safe haven, it is only a matter of time before they are all sucked into the same issues (and some are already huge ecumenists for example). They are just late to the “party”.
2 Vermont , I joined an Eastern Rite in 1978, where were you then?
I also attended an SSPX chapel in the nineties by traveling a great distance.
I knew John Vennari BEFORE he ever worked for CFN since he was located 20 minutes from my home and I followed the entire ArchBhp LeFebvre situation from the very beginning having raised questions about the NO also from the very beginning.
Again, a very ignorant and rash judgement to conclude otherwise.
The Eastern Rite I attended was pastored initially for a number of years by an excellent priest who never fostered Vatican Two or the changes that came out of it. You have told me nothing I do not or did not already know.
I repeat , the evil within must be swept out BEFORE any real changes back to Tradition will occur.
I made no rash judgment about you sweep, so lose the attitude. I made a general statement about the Eastern Rite. You may be in a parish that is safe…..but I have heard of experiences whereby ECUMENISM is alive and well in others. In time, the Eastern Rite will catch up with the Latin Rite of the Novus Ordo. JPII promulgated the new code of canon law for the Eastern churches in 1990 and it clearly teaches ecumenism in it. You may not like my prediction or comments, but they are not “rash” nor “ignorant”.
Amen Johnbilbee, the traditional movement could not have asked for a better false conciliar pope than Scatalogical Bergolio. He is simply the symptom of the problem. The modernists have tried to to build a counter church on the foundation on man instead of Christ. The sooner it fails the better.
I have also posted numerous times about the pervert priests we had in the Catholic Eastern Rite including the last one being a bi ritual ( Roman and Eastern ) cross dresser which is only one reason for which we complained to the Bishop who personally came to our Church to tell me off from the pulpit about questioning the Faith of a priest…….The priest flat out denied the Real Presence in a homily.
The Bishop closed and then sold our church and he died in a horrible accident shortly thereafter.
Now about Vigano. “Homosexuality is taken for granted in Rome. Seminarians are routinely told when they go out on the town at night not to get caught with another male because photographers are waiting. They are NOT told to stay chaste.Most of the seminarians are drunk by noon.” All this from a priest who was more recently studying for his SECOND PhD there ( as if that mattered at all Fr Belland ).
Vigano reported corruption to Benedict and was sent to the USA as Papal Nuncio .
He was NOT reporting on immoral perverted sex , he was reporting embezzlement, cronyism and graft in the Curia. The same Dicastery Diplomacy I guess the above self identifying priest studied and knows all about.
“The first claims about financial mismanagement, this time in the Vatican City of which the pope is head of state, came from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganó who was head of its administration. After his claims were made public, Viganó was packed off to Washington as papal envoy to the US. But the “Vatileaks” scandal really broke in January 2012 with programmes on Italian television that revealed the goings-on behind the scenes in the Vatican of Benedict XVI. ”
I want to make it clear that immorality and homosexuality among their own is not the big scandal to church leadership as it is to the laity now .The scandal is letting it out to the News.
I have no idea what motivated Vigano to spill to the Press now or
If he is an a acting hx himself or not .
But I am glad to see it come out.
In the end Satan devours his own anyway.
Arise Oh Lord and show Thy Face and let those who hate Thy Commandments either repent or scatter in confusion.
” You may not like my prediction or comments, but they are not “rash” nor “ignorant”.”
I did not like what I saw first hand OR what was being done to the good priests in the Eastern Rites and so we exited ONLY attending a Divine Liturgy quite far away with a wonderful priest we knew personally whose own Bishop was replaced before he died by a pervert when his good Bishop passed away.
Look, I explained our personal education on what he happened to the Catholic Churches and our journeys trying to find a decent Mass on Sundays blog posts ago. For that I was attacked here by the nervous ordites and by the SSPXers who did not like that I posted about the homosexuals we came across as priests in the Society either. Hence, the “attitude” and the jumping to conclusions that I am either stupid or proud or a priest calumnizer as with Teresa above or that I have no Faith because it is assumed I do not go to Mass i.e.Herve aka Blunder .
As I commiserated many time with My 2 Cents, we have NO decent lace in our present local to attend Mass. And contrary to Amateur Brain Surgeon’s uneducated view , our mutual NO Diocesan Bishop is a liar and is, and has a history of being, a clerical pederast cover up himself.
The sspx now has a history of bringing in novus ordo priests now as does the Resistance MC and the so called ‘fake Resistance” of Williamson.
The pre NO priests we knew who were decent, all told us privately about the plethora of homosexual clerics in the church. One even called us up warning ot to let our children go to Confession wo the priest whose Church we were going to go to. A Catholic attorney gave us a rundown of where to warn Catholic home school families not allow their sons to be altar servers. All of this was decades ago and we pray the Rosary daily that God will please remove the church of darkness from Rome AND here.
So if anyone finds my posts too long or too many , too bad. Once and for all please know where I stand and I’m fine if you all disagree with me but please do not assume I have not pursued and do not know Catholic Truth or the History of the Church both recent and ancient.
Sweep, before Jorge came out with his announcement that this sodomy abuse crisis was all of our faults because of our clericalism, you were on your own rant saying the same. This sodomy garbage is a red herring. An extremely useful red herring that also serves to shove the faithful right out the door of churches everywhere. I notice that this glorious letter from Carlo Vigano whitewashes every “pope” going back all the way to Paul VI, “These characters are closely associated with individuals belonging in particular to the deviated wing of the Society of Jesus, unfortunately today a majority, which had already been a cause of serious concern to Paul VI and subsequent pontiffs.” Not that it counts for much but I want all of you liars to know that I am not distracted by this side show of filth. I know that what you really did was to steal the Catholic Mass from me and my children and replace the true doctrine handed down for centuries with the false doctrines of your fake Vatican II Council. You are going to fool many people because we just want to go to Church and worship our Lord and receive the Sacraments, but you don’t fool all of us. I just want you all to know that.
That’s partially correct Melanie. I am sick and tired of Catholics who worship priests like the idiot cross dressing Blessed Sacrament denying perv we had. The church accountant would not report his thefts of our church accounts to the police because, “He is a Priest”. Or the people who worshiped Groeshel because he was on EWTN until he slipped up and said children seduce priests !
Or all the so called Katholics I knew who said I was evil because I said bishop McHugh was NOT pro life at all , lobbied for sex ed K-12 in the NJ public schools and had a cozy relationship with the March of Dimes despite the fact they purchased aborted babies.
Oh how dare I say a Bishop or a priest is evil? That was then and this is now…….Look who’s backing up Vigano now. Burke who himself persecuted a Catholic woman in Madison, Wisconsin when she wrote to him asking him why that he just sanctioned a transgender to start a women’s religious Order.
Then there are all the idiots posting on CMtv they want Burke to be Pope after Voris and company even used their production to lobby for him during the conclave. Voris and friends promote priest and prelate worship themselves. For years you were banned if you said anything negative about Francis , now the worms turned belly up and want him out.
Yes Melanie, the Katholic laity are partly to blame for clericalism when they destroy all humility in the clergy by worshiping priests as if they were Jesus Christ Himself instead of His servants on earth charged to feed His sheep.
It would be somewhat gratifying to see Mr Bergoglio taken out to the woodshed and never heard from again after this latest revelation. Sadly, it wont change the fact that the false church will continue to occupy Rome. So basically….big deal. Just march out the next vatican 2 sodomite supporting bishop/cardinal to take his place. As far as Fr. Ratzinger….lets ALWAYS remember that he was instrumental in putting forth this false faith from 60-65. That guy may is likely more culpable before God than Mr Bergolgio could ever be.
“This sodomy garbage is a red herring”???? Melanie, do you think this deep rooted perversion is a fake distraction? Am I misunderstanding your comment?
No My2cents, I think this deep rooted perversion is a very REAL distraction. You tell me, what is a more pressing problem, that sodomites have sex with teenage boys or that these son of a guns take away the MOST HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS? If you say that it’s sodomy then YOU are distracted.
The preponderance of sodomites in the conciliar church is a symptom of a the disease called modernism. Pleaee be leary of any argument that suggests that to “fix” the conciliar church we need to get rid of all the sodomites. While that would be amgood start it would probabaly reduce the priesthood by 50-75%. But that would still leave the rest being modernists and they are the ones guilty for allowing sodomites in the first place. I am afraid there is no upside whatsover in this latest conciliar crisis for any Traditional Catholic who professes the True Faith as taught prior to 1958 and believes that the solution to the real problem will come from those responsible for it.
Fr. Belland – I am not SSPX, nor do I agree with your thesis about Benedict. However, you seem sincere, so I offer you this word of warning.
You are obviously intelligent and have no doubt seen above that “sweepoutthefilth” and others are desperately googling you and trying to find dirt. She will likely find out that you once gassed up your car in the same state as a molester priest (several decades apart) based upon the bishopaccountability website, conjecture, and too much wine. (NB to sweep: this did not happen. It’s an example, a hypothetical.)
Then this coincidence will quickly become a bathroom tryst between you and the other priest and she will have no problem saying that here and elsewhere under some other pseudonym. If she can’t find coincidences, she’ll simply invent something. Her (doubtful) “friend” Engel “fills in the blanks” all the time, always with graphic homosexual stuff. Sometimes she is right. A lot of it is gossip. You’ve already seen how a picture of you and Williamson is being spun into something else. Her stories about knowing every single priest and bishop, running into both of them, living next door to or being intimate friends with seemingly every Catholic from Vennari to Mother Teresa (although I think it’s a different one maybe? It’s so hard to follow) are almost certainly the figments of a troubled mind.
But they are impossible to definitively debunk as she remains obstinately anonymous, as do many of those she accuses, like the mysterious “cross-dressing” priest at some parish she keeps referencing. So be very, very cautious around this particular viper.
Get lost Blunder boy below………….go worship with the dead and let the dead bury the dead as Benedict C so aptly quoted.
Tom A …Modernists did not rape these children and seminarians , as someone rightly told you on Vox …Pederasts and Sodomites did.
Let the dead bury the dead and let the snakes all eat their tails.Criminals one and all and certainly not a man of God to be found anywhere when even the priests who certainly know it all and keep their mouths shut and deny the widespread truth about the entire infiltration of the Catholic Church by perverts, masons and cushy careerists.
Melanie, my question to you was honest and sincere. There was no need to become defensive. Thankfully, there is no one among my family or friends who were innocent victims of this deep rooted perversion. In any event, I don’t think there is a need to choose the more pressing problem because the root is the same—a deep hatred of Our Lord and His Church.
Melanie , they took it away a long time ago.
We ran after it and watched one priest after another independent and otherwise either be gotten rid of through a Bishop or die.We watched as two Bishops did and is doing the same in two different Catholic Eastern Rites. The SSPX have also self fractured .
The revelations about their coverups all serves them right. God’s Will be done.
Hervy you will have to change your moniker again because you slipped up and came out of the bushes.
Sweep I am sorry for jumping on you. I realized afterwards that, given the kind of reactions you get here on the regular, it made sense for you to take my post the way you did.
I’m not being defensive My2cents, at all. There is a very grave need to choose the more pressing problem because probably over 90% of the Catholics in the world don’t even realize that the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has been stolen from them. Bergoglio was a gift to any Catholic with half a brain because he showed the Novus Ordo to be a monster. Look at all the other fake churches that people attend; many look nice, not monstrous. We KNOW the true Church because She was founded by Christ not because we like Her bestest. Novus Ordo is a fake that is being presented as the true Church and THAT is a grave danger to souls. The curtain needs to be pulled from this imposter church whether their priests are sodomites or their priests are sweet ladies or nice guys, if it’s not the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church then I say let the secular authorities deal with their sexual abuses. Send them to jail! But they aren’t Catholic.
Yes Tom. The sodomite invasion is certainly a gigantic problem and one that certainly needs to be rectified (simply because it is evil)….BUT, that is not our true problem (as most posters here are very well aware of). Sodomites running Rome is simply a result of the root disease. Until the root disease (the abomination that is Satan’s vatican 2 council) is eradicated, then we are simply spinning our wheels.
A few get it….most (those who are disgusted with “pope” francis and his shenanigans and are having a heart attack over it) dont get it yet. This clown from Argentina is not the issue.
What on Earth are you talking about? Do you actually believe that all of the people calling you out are the same person? There’s an alternative and far more likely scenario: picking fights and insulting everyone is making people dislike you.
You ought to listen to advice that was freely given by someone else here and try silence.
Sweep, your disgust of sodomites is admirable. In this we are in total agreement. But these filthy perverts infest the conciliar church because of modernism. So yes, modernism is the mechanism that allowed these perverted predators to occupy these positions of trust that allowed these young children and teenagers to be raped. Sweeping out the sodomites will not cure the patient. That will take a clean sweep of all the modernists. And that will mean 99.999% of the entire conciliar church.
That’s right Sweep, they did take it away a long time ago. And we are now going to be working on what.. our 6th fake pope from this totally fake line of apostate papal pretenders pushing this phony Vatican II Council? Isn’t the definition of insanity doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result? Oh, maybe these creepy fake priests won’t be faggots if we get a new fake pope, what the hell is wrong with everyone?
Melanie, the Church teaches us on matters of faith and morals. This current crisis deals with morals and the salacious and headline grabbing issue of sodomy, rape, and other perversions. Naturally, everyone is interested, including the pagan culture we live in. Yet when it comes to faith, no one cares. No one gets all excited over ecumenism or false religious liberty or changing the Rites and Sacraments. Its too boring and they just don’t care. Of course the average pewsitter is disgusted to learn that his pastor likes to violate little boys but the average pewsitter could care less if they tinker with the Canon or the Ordination Rites. That this mindset also infects so many so-called traditionalists is troubling and sad.
Tom A, I don’t think it’s as simple as people being bored. Most don’t understand when the teaching goes from “is” to “subsists in.” But they do understand that nobody should take advantage of even older teenage boys, never mind 11 year old baby boys who wind up broken men; because they have sons who they love very much. You know, intelligence lies on a bell curve. Not everyone can be expected to read the documents of Vatican II and realize a terrible crime has been committed. But there are men who should have realized this and instead of shouting it out, they made up nonsense to self soothe or to deceive. They will answer for it and I am disappointed in them. Vatican II was heresy. Popes don’t teach heresy. Anyone who obfuscates those facts is an enemy of the Church. That is where I stand now.
Dear Theresa, your comment is most appreciated, as well as your intercessory appeal to Our Lady, for I have been under attack by a demonic network which attack has drastically intensified when I began to promote my contention that Benedict is still Pope. One of my articles deals, in part, with the astronomical reality of the Earth’s (north) axis, towards the end of the 20th Century/beginning of the 21st, transferring from the Zodiac constellation/sign of Pices to the sign of Aquarius. Pices is the Latin word for FISH, which in Greek is ΙΧΟΥΣ, these Greek letters being an acronym for the Greek phrase referring to Christ: Ιησους Χριστος Θεου Υιος Σωτηρ, meaning Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior.
On the other hand, the Latin world Aquarius means water carrier. Of course, the One World Order powers refer to the Age of Aquarius as the NEW AGE and has been preparing for that New Age for years.
However, when we take into account the Consecration and conversion of Russia and the Era of Peace promised by Our Lady upon Her Triumph over Satan and the One Worlders, I posited that the Age of Aquarius actually refers to Our Lady, and that the Church would recognize and define Mary as the Co-Redemptrix with Christ and Mediatrix of all Graces, because in many places in Sacred Scripture water represents Grace–and she bears to her children all the Graces merited by Christ and Herself on Calvary.
One woman from the SSPX, whose first cousin on her mother’s side was the President of Dignity in the state of…… (during the ’70’s, but worked with Dignity perhaps until his death at age 64); and which woman, one of the main coordinators of that network, has been giving me a most difficult time, to say the least. Having been given a copy of my article, as well as the analysis I made of the Official Latin text of Benedict’s renunciation announcement, she convinced an SSPX Priest to put his name under her scathing critique of my work and even used his Parish Letterhead to make it look as if he was the one who was critiquing (and I have proof of this). In any case, this woman said of my article in here critique that it was nothing but a fairy tail. Such a remark about Our Lady really bothers me, for it boarders on blasphemy. There’s actually much more to the harassment I undergo, but it is the prayers of those Faithful Catholics that strengthen me in the face of the crosses I must bear. Thank you again, Theresa. May God bless and Our Lady protect you always.
P.S. There’s a Latin Proverb by Publius Sirus I believe is so true based on what I have endured for many years: “Aut amat, aut odit mulier, nihil est tertium”. “A woman either loves or she hates, there’s no in between.” Perhaps some woman on this Blog can vouch for this; or prove it wrong.
Back to that dossier blog posted by Louie for anyone who is still interested.
“Although the dossier was available only to Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and the investigators themselves, the latter were free to discuss the results of their investigation ,the dossier itself was to have been given to Benedict’s successor as Pope, Francis.”
“It was reported that leaked notes of a private conversation between Pope Francis and Catholic officials at the Latin American Conference of Religious (CLAR) confirmed the existence of “a stream of corruption”, and it is true, it is there … We need to see what we can do”. According to La Repubblica Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi made no comment on the remarks made in “a private meeting”.”
Lol, thank you Sweep for getting us back on topic. Yeah, I’m not interested in the dossier at all. What does it say? What we all already know because we can see in our own churches. All these priests are effeminate and if they aren’t sodomites they show no indication of believing in the Catholic Church. How can we have any interest in this dossier? I can write a dossier. The guy who came to bless my house was a flamer who was very nice and treated a house blessing with great irreverence. Wouldn’t let him alone with my boys. Who couldn’t write a dossier? This sodomy is such old news, I’m surprised everyone is getting worked up about it, all over again. Nobody is asking about the dossier because if the dossier actually contained the truth then we already know what it said.
Yes Melanie, many are getting all excited about the prospect of Bergolio the heretic under pressure to resign and they will gladly accept another heretic as long as he likes Latin and wear traditional vestments. They are only interested in the show and appearence and not the substance.
Melanie , a dossier on homo sex clerics would come as no surprise to Francis of this I am positive. A dossier focusing on financial corruption and who can and cannot be trusted in the Curia makes way more sense.
If you recognized a swish floating through your home doing a house blessing , just imagine how old hat it is in the Vatican !
Bad PR means financial losses. Who in the Curia cares about the peasants children being raped? On the other hand the media exposure may just cause a peasant revolt resulting in laws being changed.
Dear Fr Belland, I’m in complete agreement with you that Pope Benedict is still the reigning pontiff. Concerning the woman you spoke about,its my belief that your being the bane of her existence is for the very salvation of her soul. ( she is in your path for that reason as you most certainly already know)., How incredibly blessed we women are to have Our Immaculate Mother to model ourselves after, the only woman you need be concerned about pleasing is Our Lady …….She is the joy of my heart next to Our sweet Savior. Please be assured that you will be named in my daily rosaries . I attend the small SSPX chapel when I’m able to as I care for my elderly mother in law, and when I am able to get there it’s a very happy day!
Tom, so be it ,if it is in God’s Divine plan.
Japanese Catholics held onto the faith for more than 250 years without priests.
Before a wound can heal, clean off the filth and apply an antiseptic. You have to administer an antibiotic also if there is a risk of infection. We know we have all of this within the institutional church.
The more you dig the more filth you will find. If all the pervert clergy (from the top down) were to disappear, who will be left to restore the Catholic Church to Her full Glory? There was a time I thought the SSPX , but now not so sure. Please God, send us a Saint!
Seems, you are not sure of many things concerning the good of your soul, you’re scandalized, because you trust yourself, and other weak, confused souls……as if God has abandoned His Church…..If that was only possible!
“Walk while you have the light, that darkness (despair, my emphasis) may not overtake you.” St. John 12:35.
“Remember the Head and the Body to which you belong!” – Pope St. Leo
‘O ye of little faith?’ (Mt. 6)…….how distrustful we are!
“Oh, if we only had greater faith in divine Providence, for we do not see the reason why particular circumstances and creatures make us suffer, it is because we do not see the place they occupy in the plan of divine Providence in which everything is ordered for purification of our souls, ultimately for our good……we believe in theory, but we forget in practice, so we continually ask ‘Why does God permit this???’ ”
“All the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth, to them that seek after His covenant and His testimonies” (Ps. 24,10)…..would He abandon ‘her’ whom ‘He had purchased with His own Blood” (Acts, 20,28) + (Divine Intimacy, by Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalen).
O Lord give to Your Church many holy priests!
My 2 Cents, Trust the Our Lord Jesus Christ who is the ONLY one who reads hearts and will provide. God is omniscient and He loves us very very much and desires ONLY what is good for our souls.
That is why I see His hand in all of this.Apparently others are seeing the same.
Listen to this podcast
Come on now, don’t be a hypocrite. You want to do the whole washer woman routine, then do it right. Tell us the name of this “effeminate” guy who you wouldn’t let your kids near so other kids, not just yours, can be safe. Then we can link it to all the other old lady blogs and spread this the right way
“Please God, send us a Saint” This is my prayer of Hope and Trust. I know Our Lord will never abandon His Church. “O Lord give to Your Church many holy priests”. Yes!
Bless your heart. If you need me to send you a list of the effeminate guys I’ve met, in order to keep your kids safe, then you’ve got problems that I can’t help you with. I can give you a tip. This guy here looks like a distinguished, handsome, older gentleman and YET maybe you don’t want to send your kids to the beach house with him for the weekend. Ya know, maybe leave the slumber parties back in the 80’s, IslesRoo1.
Your the one who judged a man to be a danger to children and decided to gossip about it. But somehow I knew you wouldn’t back up your words by protecting others from this monster by telling us who he is. Oh well, perhaps we’ll hear about him on someone’s podcast. I’m sure barnyard.pig will enlighten us soon enough
It’s not a terrible idea IslesRoo1. Go ahead and provide your name and the names of all your queer friends and we’ll keep our kids away from all of you. Thanks!
So shocked by that response. Never saw that coming.
IslesRoo1: Your “barnyard.pig” is pure gold. Works on so many levels. Thank you for that laugh.
Melanie is now simply following the sweepoutthefilth playbook, (or she may be sweepoutthefilth under another pseudonym): tell a shocking and scandalous story with no verifiable details and slander anyone who questions you. It’s easy, watch:
I was the best friend of a whole bunch of dead people who can’t disprove what I’m saying like Malcolm Muggeridge and the Von Hildebrands and they ALL told me everything I am saying here is true. I am persecuted for being a living Saint. Malachi Martin owned the Manhattan townhouse next to mine which somehow was also next to John Vennari’s house in Buffalo until a well-known pedophile Monsignor who used the drag name Calamity Jane stole the deed to my house and kidnapped a blonde woman and climbed the Empire State Building and was shot by Air Force planes and fell and Malachi said “’twas beauty killed the beast.” What’s that? You say that’s clearly the plot of “King Kong”? You must be a pedophile like the other Monsignor of my parish, who turned out to be a female little person in drag on stilts.
And you can’t prove any of it isn’t true.
Melanie just proved the point I was trying to make. There is a weird homo obsession around here. I’m just an anonymous person who hurt her pride and she labeled me and my friends queer. Very odd behavior.
I have been asking this over and over again.
The freaks won, for now. Soon, they will face the wrath! I wonder if George is mentioned in that file. I bet you he’s a fag.
As the comments section has closed in the more recent postings…here is wishing HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Our Lady !!