SSPX: To be, or not to be, “regularized”

fellay-csjWith reports suggesting that canonical regularization of the SSPX is close at hand (whatever “close” means), anxiety is running at an all-time high among so-called “traditionalists” (aka Catholics).

I’ve made my thoughts on the matter rather clear in the past (e.g., HERE and HERE), but given the present state of affairs concerning Francis in light of the dubia and reasonable doubts about his validity, we have a new wrinkle to consider.

As regular readers of this space know very well, I am convinced that Jorge Bergoglio has plainly judged himself a formal heretic and therefore no pope at all.

(Seriously folks, the man has been publicly called to account for his heresies for many months now, most recently via the dubia, and he has only doubled down on his explicit contradictions of dogmatic teaching.)

At the very least, one cannot help but wonder if in fact he is a legitimate pope.

As such, it is reasonable to ask if it makes sense for the Society to accept a canonical recognition from the hands of Francis given his questionable status.

In order to arrive at an answer, it is necessary to take a few steps back…

The plain and simple fact of the matter is that the SSPX finds itself in an “irregular” state for one reason and one reason alone; those in authority, up to and including popes, have abused their power and acted unjustly.

The Society of St. Pius X has never been anything other than in “full communion” with the Church; their relationship with Eternal Rome unquestioned.

It is the modernists running the show in the Rome of today who breached their own relationship with Holy Mother Church.

The words of St. Athanasius are perfectly applicable here, “They [Rome] have the buildings; we [SSPX] have the Faith.”

“Full communion” for the Society does not belong to any pope; i.e., it does not exist simply because he or someone else in authority formally declares it – no more than it ceased to exist simply because they denied it.

If Rome changes course and decides to formally recognize that the SSPX has the Faith; granting them regular jurisdiction, doing so will be nothing more than a matter of justice.

The value of that act of governance does not so much rest on the person of the pope (or the man dressed as such) as it does on the objective truth that the Society and its teachings are entirely Catholic.

While locking the SSPX out of the building (denying them formal jurisdiction) had no effect on that objective truth, it did profoundly effect the way in which the majority of undernourished Catholics viewed the Society (e.g., as a “break away” sect, schismatic, with questionable teachings and invalid sacraments).

Regular jurisdiction for the SSPX will be a great benefit for those souls and their salvation no matter who unlocks the building, and like it or not, they keys are in the hands of modernists right now.

Can the modernists be trusted?

Hell, no!

But what’s the worse that can happen?

Bishop Fellay has insisted that he will only move forward with a Personal Prelature if Rome offers a “clear, straightforward statement that these guarantees (that the SSPX can remain as they are) will be respected.”

If the modernists in Rome offer such a guarantee and then renege by insisting that the Society in some way compromise, I have every confidence that they will simply refuse; even if that means being kicked out of the building once again and returning to the state in which they find themselves today.

I honestly don’t know what all the panic is all about. The challenge to remain faithful in the face of evil is the daily fare of every Catholic – always has been; always will be.

In conclusion…

I must say that one of the things that I would expect to see happen very shortly after the Society’s regularization (should that happen) is for Bishop Fellay to begin speaking publicly and forcefully on the matter of Amoris Laetitia, the dubia and Francis’ validity.

I think it’s fair to say that the Society’s public response to date has lacked, shall we say, the kind of Apostolic zeal that one might have expected given the offensiveness of the heresies and blasphemies in question.

Right or wrong, perhaps the decision was made to temper the response, as an attempt to exercise prudence, given that formal jurisdiction appears near.

Whether one agrees or not, I can imagine how a case might be made for such a decision.

That said, once the Personal Prelature either happens, or it becomes obvious that this act of justice isn’t so near after all, there can be no reason for Bishop Fellay to refrain any longer from plainly condemning Amoris Laetitia in its entirety in no uncertain terms; denouncing in particular the specific heresies and blasphemies that it contains.

Back in April, Bishop Fellay likened this dreadful document to a boat that is reasonably well constructed in Chapters 1 thru 7, but has a gaping hole below the sea line courtesy of Chapter 8.

In spite of any claims that Amoris Laetitia contains much that is “beautiful,” the plain truth is that it adds absolutely, positively nothing to the perfectly sound vessel that already exists in the Church’s authentic magisterium on marriage and family. Nothing.

That being the case, insisting that Francis fix the hole in Amoris Laetitia with “clarifications” is utterly useless.

This evil text needs to be incinerated and reduced to ash immediately, and the actual relationship of its author to the Body of Christ needs to be addressed plainly.

I for one am looking forward to the day when the Society of St. Pius X and Bishop Fellay will issue an unequivocal call for precisely this. Whether that takes place with or without regular jurisdiction, it needs to happen soon.

The salvation of souls is at stake.

aka 2017-2

Share this post on:facebooktwittergoogle_plusreddit
Follow us on:facebooktwittergoogle_plusvimeo

Latest Comments

  1. Caimbeul February 6, 2017
  2. Katherine February 6, 2017
  3. Evangeline February 6, 2017
  4. maryiloveher February 6, 2017
  5. Paul M February 6, 2017
  6. my2cents February 6, 2017
  7. The Papal Subject February 6, 2017
  8. Caimbeul February 6, 2017
  9. Servant of Our Lady February 6, 2017
  10. Caimbeul February 6, 2017
  11. A Catholic Thinker February 6, 2017
  12. maryiloveher February 6, 2017
  13. A Catholic Thinker February 6, 2017
  14. jean.pie February 6, 2017
  15. tradprofessor February 7, 2017
  16. Caimbeul February 7, 2017
  17. top8305 February 7, 2017
  18. top8305 February 7, 2017
  19. Tom A February 7, 2017
  20. Katherine February 7, 2017
  21. Katherine February 7, 2017
  22. Katherine February 7, 2017
  23. Katherine February 7, 2017
  24. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  25. A Simple Beggar February 7, 2017
  26. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  27. Petrus Romanus February 7, 2017
  28. Petrus Romanus February 7, 2017
  29. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  30. The Papal Subject February 7, 2017
  31. The Papal Subject February 7, 2017
  32. Caimbeul February 7, 2017
  33. The Papal Subject February 7, 2017
  34. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  35. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  36. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  37. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  38. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  39. Caimbeul February 7, 2017
  40. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  41. Caimbeul February 7, 2017
  42. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  43. Caimbeul February 7, 2017
  44. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  45. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  46. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  47. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  48. Petrus Romanus February 7, 2017
  49. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  50. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  51. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  52. maryiloveher February 7, 2017
  53. Petrus Romanus February 7, 2017
  54. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  55. A Catholic Thinker February 7, 2017
  56. Michael65 February 8, 2017
  57. Michael65 February 8, 2017
  58. Lynda February 8, 2017
  59. rcaamo February 8, 2017
  60. Katherine February 8, 2017
  61. Katherine February 8, 2017
  62. Katherine February 8, 2017
  63. Katherine February 8, 2017
  64. The Papal Subject February 8, 2017
  65. The Papal Subject February 8, 2017
  66. The Papal Subject February 8, 2017
  67. Caimbeul February 8, 2017
  68. Caimbeul February 8, 2017
  69. Caimbeul February 8, 2017
  70. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  71. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  72. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  73. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  74. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  75. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  76. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  77. pearl87 February 9, 2017
  78. Paul M February 9, 2017
  79. Tom A February 9, 2017
  80. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  81. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  82. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  83. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  84. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  85. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  86. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  87. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  88. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  89. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  90. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  91. rich February 12, 2017
  92. rich February 12, 2017
  93. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  94. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  95. A Catholic Thinker February 12, 2017
  96. pearl87 February 17, 2017
  97. pearl87 February 17, 2017