SSPX on Amoris, Francis, continued…

Francis sneerRealizing that my previous post on this topic is perhaps too time-consuming a read for some, here I offer a far briefer overview with citations not found in part one.

In answer to the question, Is Pope Francis heretical, Fr. Gleize concluded:

Not heretical but promoting heresy … it is not the scandal of a heresy formulated doctrinally; it is the scandal of a praxis that clears the way for a challenge to Catholic truth on the indissolubility of marriage.

First, let it be said that Amoris Laetitia does far more than just cast doubt on the indissolubility of marriage; it upends the very notion of mortal sin and intrinsic evil – the far reaching deleterious effects of which cannot be overestimated.

Some readers appear content to focus on the accusation of “promoting heresy;” as if it is enough to say that Amoris Laetitia suffers only from ambiguity.

As the editor’s note following Fr. Gelize’s article insists:

None of the ambiguous statements in Amoris laetitia constitute “a rejection or contradiction of a truth that is not only revealed but also proposed as such by an infallible act of the ecclesiastical Magisterium” [the definition of “heretical” provided by Fr. Gleize].

Is that conclusion the reality?

Consider the following, presented in plain language, and then you tell me:

Revealed truth proposed by the infallible Magisterium of the Church: It is to be maintained, that sanctifying grace is lost by any mortal sin including adultery. (see Council of Trent, Session VI, Chapter XV)

Exhortation disseminated throughout the Universal Church by Francis: It can no longer be said that those in adultery are living in a state of mortal sin and deprived of sanctifying grace. (see Amoris Laetitia 301)

Revealed truth proposed by the infallible Magisterium of the Church: If any one says that the commandments of God are impossible to keep; let him be anathema. (see Council of Trent, Session VI, Canon XVIII)

Exhortation disseminated throughout the Universal Church by Francis: An individual can be in a situation that makes it impossible to refrain from adultery. At times, adultery is the most generous response that one can give to God. (see Amoris Laetitia 301, 303)

Revealed truth proposed by the infallible Magisterium of the Church: If any one says that God not only permits works that are evil, but that He works them properly and of Himself; let him be anathema.” (see Council of Trent, Session VI, Session VI, Canon VI) Let no man, when he is tempted, say that he is tempted by God. For God is not a tempter of evils: and he tempteth no man. (James 13:1)

Exhortation disseminated throughout the Universal Church by Francis: Situations exist wherein an individual can discern with certain moral security that persisting in adultery is what God himself is asking. (see Amoris Laetitia 303)

So, does Amoris Laetitia, or does it not, manifest “a rejection or contradiction of a truth that is not only revealed but also proposed as such by an infallible act of the ecclesiastical Magisterium”?

Not only is the answer entirely obvious to those of us with a sincere love of Catholic tradition, but also to certain men-of-the-Council (including the three “full communion bishops cited in part one):

“I am still convinced that some of the statements in AL are wrong and even (in some cases) objectively heretical.”Professor Josef Seifert, philosopher and close personal friend of John Paul II

Fr. Gleize clearly disagrees. He does suggest, however, that Francis is proceeding in the manner of the modernists who “take advantage of unwary minds [and] promote heresy while giving the appearance of remaining Catholic.”

Who among us is so unwary of mind as to believe that the above mentioned citations of Amoris Laetitia have even the remote appearance of Catholicity?

To me, the overwhelming appearance is plainly diabolical.

Is Francis a modernist?

Indeed he is!

Fellay on FrancisI was present at Holy Mass in October of 2013 when Bishop Fellay declared of Francis: “What we have before us is a genuine modernist!”

Has something changed?

It would appear so.

Fr. Gleize (let’s not kid ourselves, on behalf of the Society) is suggesting that while Francis behaves like a modernist, somehow he is “not heretical.”

Given that “modernism” as defined by the saintly namesake of the Society is the “synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi), this amounts to splitting hairs to the point of absurdity; especially in light of the blatant contradictions of infallible truth outlined above.

Over the years, I have been a staunch defender of the SSPX and its Superior General, Bishop Bernard Fellay. I’ve enjoyed sincere friendships with certain of their priests, other staff, and faithful. (Hopefully, I still do.)

At times, I’ve even been accused of being a paid mouthpiece for the Society.

Since launching akaCatholic, new supporters have come and others have gone; the latter, at times (like right now), for having taken offense at certain of the positions articulated here.

I won’t lie. Staying afloat hasn’t been easy, and as I write times are definitely tough.

And yet, through it all, one thing remains unchanged; the pursuit of truth regardless of cost.

If that effort should one day render me friendless and this blog utterly devoid of supporters, so be it.

Roughly one year ago today, in a post wherein I came to the defense of the SSPX and Bishop Fellay, I wrote:

So, what is my dog in this fight?

To be very clear, it’s not that I’m on “team SSPX” or “team Fellay.” I’m on “team Catholic.”

Most importantly, I concluded:

It just so happens that the Society of St. Pius X, under the leadership of Bishop Bernard Fellay, is on the same team.

Short of a correction and a retraction of Fr. Gleize’s stunning assessment of Francis and Amoris Laetitia (which I have invited my contacts within the Society to offer) it is with a heavy heart that I now have reason to wonder if, and to what extent, that’s still true.

aka-signal

Share this post on:facebooktwittergoogle_plusreddit
Follow us on:facebooktwittergoogle_plusvimeo

Latest Comments

  1. Ganganelli March 13, 2017
  2. Akita March 13, 2017
  3. A Simple Beggar March 13, 2017
  4. Ana Milan March 13, 2017
  5. Simple Shepherd March 13, 2017
  6. john6 March 13, 2017
  7. prisca ann March 13, 2017
  8. prisca ann March 13, 2017
  9. john6 March 13, 2017
  10. paultdale March 13, 2017
  11. 19ssoldie36 March 13, 2017
  12. Servant of Our Lady March 13, 2017
  13. my2cents March 13, 2017
  14. my2cents March 13, 2017
  15. J-Bomb March 13, 2017
  16. Tom A March 13, 2017
  17. Tom A March 13, 2017
  18. AlphonsusJr March 13, 2017
  19. rich March 13, 2017
  20. Danielpan March 14, 2017
  21. Johnno March 14, 2017
  22. Ganganelli March 14, 2017
  23. gildaswiseman March 14, 2017
  24. maryiloveher March 14, 2017
  25. maryiloveher March 14, 2017
  26. Theresa March 14, 2017
  27. Ganganelli March 14, 2017
  28. Ganganelli March 14, 2017
  29. gildaswiseman March 14, 2017
  30. maryiloveher March 14, 2017
  31. gildaswiseman March 14, 2017
  32. A Simple Beggar March 14, 2017
  33. A Simple Beggar March 14, 2017
  34. A Simple Beggar March 14, 2017
  35. Servant of Our Lady March 14, 2017
  36. The Papal Subject March 14, 2017
  37. my2cents March 14, 2017
  38. lusp March 14, 2017
  39. The Papal Subject March 14, 2017
  40. Tom A March 14, 2017
  41. maryiloveher March 14, 2017
  42. Tom A March 14, 2017
  43. Katherine March 14, 2017
  44. maryiloveher March 14, 2017
  45. Simple Shepherd March 14, 2017
  46. Caimbeul March 15, 2017
  47. Theresa March 15, 2017
  48. Gwaredd Thomas March 15, 2017
  49. Gwaredd Thomas March 15, 2017
  50. Caimbeul March 15, 2017
  51. gildaswiseman March 15, 2017
  52. Tom A March 15, 2017
  53. Danielpan March 15, 2017
  54. Danielpan March 15, 2017
  55. The Papal Subject March 15, 2017
  56. gildaswiseman March 16, 2017
  57. Caimbeul March 16, 2017
  58. Professor Q March 17, 2017
  59. Tom A March 17, 2017
  60. Danielpan March 18, 2017
  61. Professor Q March 20, 2017
  62. Caimbeul March 20, 2017
  63. Esteban August 14, 2017