With eyes of faith one can discern the sheer and utter folly of the church of man. Cardinal Happy is immersed in this man centered religion to the detriment of the loss of souls…and I`m afraid he`s not the only one. .
NellOctober 19, 2013
Powerful example of Ugly & Beauty side by side. Is there anything more creepy than a bunch of hippies celebrating each other for their tolerance of vice? Dolan a man of great affectation.
Good Lord, what has been seen cannot be unseen. What are these prelates thin–ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL. –> “The bishops, particularly, must be able to support the movements of God among their people with patience, so that no one is left behind. But they must also be able to accompany the flock that has a flair for finding new paths.” http://ebougis.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/warning-the-following-post-contains-graphic-and-disturbing-images-nsfw/
roguehopOctober 19, 2013
Poor lost sheep – know that the sin of sodom is one of the few sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance – (murder also – and yes abortion is murder of whatever degree) note the ten commandments in Hebrew say thou shalt not murder (there is justifiable, if regretable killing) yet here people – I presume, who are close to the Blessed Sacrament celebrating a sin that put thorns on the Head of Our Lord and nails in His Hands…we all are sinners…but how many of us attend Mass to celebrate our sinfulness before the Body and Blood of Our Saviour Who was born of the Virgin and died that we might have those abominations washed from our beings to be reconciled with our Creator, our Saviour?
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. God, for Francis, is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
The 1969 Ordo, I again think, gives free rein to what St. Pius X calls the Modernist’s “intuition of the heart”. It allows many diverse expressions of faith in the Unknowable. The authenticity of these expressions will be determined by their longevity, or the “survival of the fittest”, so to speak. As Francis says:
“We must…focus on…starting long-run historical processes…. God manifests himself in time and is present in the processes of history. This gives priority to actions that give birth to new historical dynamics. And it requires patience, waiting.”
In contrast, by “the ideology of the TLM” I question whether Francis means its implicit acceptance of the dogmas (does Francis have these?) of the First Vatican Council: amongst others, that God’s existence is intellectually certain and, “If anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible by external signs, and that therefore men should be drawn to the faith only by their personal internal experience or by private inspiration, let him be anathema”.
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. For Francis, God is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
The 1969 Ordo, I again think, gives free rein to what St. Pius X calls the Modernist’s “intuition of the heart”. It allows many diverse expressions of faith in the Unknowable. The authenticity of these expressions will be determined by their longevity, or the “survival of the fittest”, so to speak. As Francis says:
“We must…focus on…starting long-run historical processes…. God manifests himself in time and is present in the processes of history. This gives priority to actions that give birth to new historical dynamics. And it requires patience, waiting.”
In contrast, by “the ideology of the TLM” I question whether Francis means its implicit acceptance of the dogmas (does Francis have these?) of the First Vatican Council: amongst others, that God’s existence is intellectually certain and, “If anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible by external signs, and that therefore men should be drawn to the faith only by their personal internal experience or by private inspiration, let him be anathema”.
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. For Francis, God is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
MagdaleneOctober 19, 2013
Surely makes you wonder about his own orientation when he smiles and nods and is certainly approving of the homosexual lifestyle as caught on this video.
Jack ArcherOctober 20, 2013
It all makes sense to me now…
The Lord allowed Vatican II to happen so these corruptions that were going to take place anyway, would occur in the Vatican II “New Church”. The Latin Mass and the rest of Tradition in its perfect form is preserved in its 1962 time-capsule. The day will come – probably long after we are all dead and buried and some horrendous tragedies have shaken the world to its core – when sanity will reign in the hierarchy again. When that happens, they will have a clear place from which to pick up all the pieces and rebuild Christ’s Church.
On the completely Orwellian absurdity of the Novus Ordo service and the traditional Mass being two forms of the same rite, see the following essay at the Remnant newspaper site:
If It’s Just the ‘Extraordinary Form’ What Do You Expect?, by Louis Tofari
You should have put a question mark at the end of the title of this post.
With eyes of faith one can discern the sheer and utter folly of the church of man. Cardinal Happy is immersed in this man centered religion to the detriment of the loss of souls…and I`m afraid he`s not the only one. .
Powerful example of Ugly & Beauty side by side. Is there anything more creepy than a bunch of hippies celebrating each other for their tolerance of vice? Dolan a man of great affectation.
Good Lord, what has been seen cannot be unseen. What are these prelates thin–ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL. –> “The bishops, particularly, must be able to support the movements of God among their people with patience, so that no one is left behind. But they must also be able to accompany the flock that has a flair for finding new paths.” http://ebougis.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/warning-the-following-post-contains-graphic-and-disturbing-images-nsfw/
Poor lost sheep – know that the sin of sodom is one of the few sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance – (murder also – and yes abortion is murder of whatever degree) note the ten commandments in Hebrew say thou shalt not murder (there is justifiable, if regretable killing) yet here people – I presume, who are close to the Blessed Sacrament celebrating a sin that put thorns on the Head of Our Lord and nails in His Hands…we all are sinners…but how many of us attend Mass to celebrate our sinfulness before the Body and Blood of Our Saviour Who was born of the Virgin and died that we might have those abominations washed from our beings to be reconciled with our Creator, our Saviour?
In his “Civilta Cattolica” interview, Pope Francis says of the TLM:
“What is worrying, though, is the risk of [its] ideologisation”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/september/documents/papa-francesco_20130921_intervista-spadaro_en.html
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. God, for Francis, is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
The 1969 Ordo, I again think, gives free rein to what St. Pius X calls the Modernist’s “intuition of the heart”. It allows many diverse expressions of faith in the Unknowable. The authenticity of these expressions will be determined by their longevity, or the “survival of the fittest”, so to speak. As Francis says:
“We must…focus on…starting long-run historical processes…. God manifests himself in time and is present in the processes of history. This gives priority to actions that give birth to new historical dynamics. And it requires patience, waiting.”
In contrast, by “the ideology of the TLM” I question whether Francis means its implicit acceptance of the dogmas (does Francis have these?) of the First Vatican Council: amongst others, that God’s existence is intellectually certain and, “If anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible by external signs, and that therefore men should be drawn to the faith only by their personal internal experience or by private inspiration, let him be anathema”.
In his “Civilta Cattolica” interview, Pope Francis says of the TLM:
“What is worrying, though, is the risk of [its] ideologisation”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/september/documents/papa-francesco_20130921_intervista-spadaro_en.html
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. For Francis, God is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
The 1969 Ordo, I again think, gives free rein to what St. Pius X calls the Modernist’s “intuition of the heart”. It allows many diverse expressions of faith in the Unknowable. The authenticity of these expressions will be determined by their longevity, or the “survival of the fittest”, so to speak. As Francis says:
“We must…focus on…starting long-run historical processes…. God manifests himself in time and is present in the processes of history. This gives priority to actions that give birth to new historical dynamics. And it requires patience, waiting.”
In contrast, by “the ideology of the TLM” I question whether Francis means its implicit acceptance of the dogmas (does Francis have these?) of the First Vatican Council: amongst others, that God’s existence is intellectually certain and, “If anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible by external signs, and that therefore men should be drawn to the faith only by their personal internal experience or by private inspiration, let him be anathema”.
In his “Civilta Cattolica” interview, Pope Francis says of the TLM:
“What is worrying, though, is the risk of [its] ideologisation”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/speeches/2013/september/documents/papa-francesco_20130921_intervista-spadaro_en.html
I think Francis prefers the 1969 Ordo for the same reason that he “would
not speak of ‘absolute’ truths”. For Francis, God is “not an idea”, but the grounds for his confidence in the reality of God appear to be his “thought” and his “experience”, and the fact that “how many, yesterday and today, share it!”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/letters/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130911_eugenio-scalfari_en.html
“I have a dogmatic certainty”, Francis says to “Civilta”: “God is in every person’s life”.
Surely makes you wonder about his own orientation when he smiles and nods and is certainly approving of the homosexual lifestyle as caught on this video.
It all makes sense to me now…
The Lord allowed Vatican II to happen so these corruptions that were going to take place anyway, would occur in the Vatican II “New Church”. The Latin Mass and the rest of Tradition in its perfect form is preserved in its 1962 time-capsule. The day will come – probably long after we are all dead and buried and some horrendous tragedies have shaken the world to its core – when sanity will reign in the hierarchy again. When that happens, they will have a clear place from which to pick up all the pieces and rebuild Christ’s Church.
Yeah, that’s it…
On the completely Orwellian absurdity of the Novus Ordo service and the traditional Mass being two forms of the same rite, see the following essay at the Remnant newspaper site:
If It’s Just the ‘Extraordinary Form’ What Do You Expect?, by Louis Tofari