As Cornelia Ferreira observed on these pages last July, a synthesis between many prominent traditionalists and conservatives has been taking place right before our very eyes; a phenomenon that she aptly identified as Conservative-Traditionalism.
Readers of this space have also long lamented the fact that the well-established traditional Catholic apostolates and their media outlets have taken on an ecumenical mindset; one that seeks common ground with neo-conservatives by applauding their hero-prelates whenever they happen to utter a truth, while deliberately ignoring the grave errors and offenses against the Faith that they so often dispense in the process.
Having identified the crisis, it’s now time for all of us to do something about it; for the Glory of God and the salvation of souls.
Introducing The Catholic Inquisitor – a traditional Catholic newspaper committed to defending Catholic tradition – every issue, every month – without compromise.
With an impressive line-up of contributors, The Catholic Inquisitor pledges to tirelessly seek the truth, to deliver it to our readers faithfully, and to defend it from every attack regardless of cost and no matter the source – even if it comes from a bishop in white.
Visit The Catholic Inquisitor website now to hear from some of our writers and to learn more.
A new day is dawning in traditional Catholic print media. Become a part of it today.
I would like to sign up for a print addition but it says I have to do it through PayPal. Is there another way to do this payment without having to go through PayPal? I do not wish to use PayPal.
I agree. Using PayPal is a huge problem. Why not direct debit from verified account?
Yes. There is a mail-in Order Form linked under the subscribe buttons. Thanks so much.
Eagerly looking forward to the first edition…
I think it’s critical that this new publication regularly offer faith-building material in addition to critiques of the Judas Council and its filthy hirelings such as Cardinal Dolan. Without that edifying material, critiques of the Judas Council and its feculent scum dogs could lead us to despair, or deeper into despair.
If it does include such material, I’d be willing to donate beyond the subscription I just bought.
Excellent work in offering a hard-copy option, by the way. I’m gradually minimizing the internet in my life, to the print edition option was most welcome.
Please add a print edition for people outside the US.
Please offer a combo! I want the print and electronic versions, both!
Exciting. Thank you and others involved for your efforts!
Louie, I see you are publisher/editor. Can I presume that it isn’t anti-sedevacantist then?
I’d be happy to let Michael Matt know about this venture, but unfortunately Im banned from posting on “The Remnant”.
Because of their many years upholding Tradition, I have great respect for John Vennari (RIP) and Michael Matt. However, I have made the decision not to renew my subscriptions because it is quite apparent that they are willing to expose Bergoglio and Co. for what they are without ever using the word “Heretic”. Also, Michael Matt seems to have great faith that Card. Burke may be the Savior of Tradition. I totally disagree. Therefore, this new publication is very exciting. The credentials of the contributors are impressive. Thank you, Louie. I’m looking forward to the first issue and all thereafter.
I second that 2Cents.
I am happy, excited and grateful.
Now I know why Providence did not permit you to become the editor of the CFN and removed you from speaking engagements.
I pray your mission succeeds.
Bwah! Feculent scum dog! Bow wow wow!
why is there no way for us to buy print addition outside USA, hard copy means it can be left in novous ordo church etc
God Bless you and your work Louie. I am excited to see your first edition. Please keep us posted on expected delivery date.
I was wondering whether it would be possible to make the Print edition available to those outside the USA as I am certain that there would be a great in the U.K.
I will be sending a check today for the ‘print’ subscription.
May God bless all soldiers of Christ!
Why use the pejorative name “Inquisitor”? I appreciate the honesty but it serve as an excuse to dismiss the whole effort. We’ll get lumped in with dailystormer etc. How about the Catholic Love News Organization?
The Left always uses benign names, things like:
People for the American Way
Project for a New American Century
Soros’ people come up with benign sounding clever names, and they are less objectionable. Sorry, but I think that’s the right playbook, as it relates to the name. Please reconsider “Inquisitor” ASAP.
PS. My first reaction was our enemies will think it means Inquisition.
You’re advocating CatholiCuckery. As a species of cuckservative, CatholiCucks live in perpetual fear of being branded as intolerant, RAAAAAAACISSSS, HOMOPHOOOOOBIC, or otherwise troglodytic. Thus CatholiCucks, burning with unquenchable lust for mainstream respectability (said lust being the defining characteristic of pitiful, pitiful cuckservatives) constantly water down. Consequently, they constantly slide left.
In truth, the choice of “Inquisitor” in the name is brilliant, not least because it repels those shattered souls known as CatholiCucks.
Good! Let them.
Enemies are to be destroyed, not satisfied.
And a proper reading of “Love your enemies” reveals that it is NOT a prescription for laying down, in a fit of pitiful virtue signaling, and letting your enemies destroy you.
The content should be totally uncucked. Agreed.
The content is rooted in faith and love for the truth, so why can’t we use love in the name?
I’m just saying sometimes you don’t have to hand the enemy a gift. I think people are missing my point.
Soros doesn’t name his orgs: Soros Revolution Brigade. If he did, nobody would even give it a hearing. I’m just saying we should co-opt positive terms, we deserve to use them, since ultimately professing the Faith in authenticity is positive, loving, welcoming etc.
You’ve internalized the commands of your oppressors in thinking that the Inquisition was horrible, and in being concerned with placating your filthy enemies.
The word “Inquisitor” is soaked in love, a burning love for truth. It’s also beautifully militant, and thus provokes every brand of SJW, soy boy, and girly-men to bite their pillows. On this latter basis alone, the name is excellent.
Don’t let the CatholiCucky advocacy of “prudence” as a cover for cowardice continue to weaken your knees.
My preferred title for the paper would be this:
“The Inquisitor’s Inquisitorial Inquisition of Iniquitous Conciliar Imbecility”
But I’ve learned not to make the perfect the enemy of the good.
Catholics truly need to go through a paradigm shift in the post Vatican II era.
It sounds like the new paper isn’t for you. Rather than emulate the darkness of the lying and deceiving son of Satan Soros and his ilk, Louie has chosen to do battle under the standard of unvarnished truth and light. This is most SHOOOOOCKING and OFFEEEEEEENSIVE to those acclimatized to today’s atmosphere of diabolical disorientation.
Nevertheless I urge you to man-up, give the paper a chance, and then burn your tutu.
I hear you. If you’re preaching to the choir, then use the term Inquisition. However, if we’re going to reach the center we have to be careful. Crusader and Inquisitor are loaded terms, at least as where the Overton window is.
I think Canon212 is a clever name.
It disgusts me that the Jesuits push their heresy in a mag named after America, but that gives them mainstream availability to the center. Too bad they got the name first.
How about “Prayer of the Faithful”? We can co-opt that. “Bread of Life” would be good too. Reel’em in!
I don’t remember Christ or the Catholic Church prior to Vatican II worried about “the center”.
How about The Catholic Testicle? Testicle comes from the Latin virility. Sounds about right to me. It would be a cheeky and catchy name for sure.
Bingo. Look to Jesus, St. Paul, St. Peter, the great Torquemada, etc. They never advocated softening up to appeal to the milquetoast center. Rather, Jesus said things like “I will spit the lukewarm out of my mouth” and “I bring not peace, but the sword.” CatholiCucks would have counseled softening up such language. Pitiful!
60657Cath, in the language of today’s ghetto-speak: u betta check yoself b4 u reck yoself!
You remind me of the perfidious counterfeit conservative (((Ben Shapiro))), who in the perfidious (((The Weekly Standard))) has recently advocated that conservatives soften up and appeal to the degenerate youth of today by embracing tolerance for sodomite perverts, tranny freaks, etc. Like (((Shapiro))), CatholiCucks would have us adopt the degenerate, soft ways of worldlings instead of the steely manliness of Christ and his servants. Pitiful!
Right Left and Center are constructs of modernism. There is only what is Catholic and what is not. The best way to get the world to notice us is to offend their modernist sensibilities.
hehehe…. I think that’s going a little TOO far.
Imagine a man approached by a robber. The robber demands all his money. The man says “Let’s compromise. I’ll give you half, you let me keep half.” The robber takes half and leaves. The next day the man is approached by the same robber, who demands all his money. The man says “Let’s compromise. I’ll give you half, you let me keep half.” The robber takes half and leaves. This continues to happen day after day. What is the end result?
Compare the following sentences:
“The integrity of the data has been conserved.”
“The integrity of the data has been compromised.”
To conserve something and to compromise something are two opposite things. A “compromising conservative” is the same as a “married bachelor” or a “square triangle.”
And note this from the “conservative” National Review:
Time for a Compromise on Transgenderism
The “conservative” National Review has long since capitulated on both sodomite “marriage” and the ongoing third world alien invasion of the West.
This is where cuckservatism and its constant virtue signaling compromising leads: to the full blown diabolical disorientation of support for total degeneracy. Pitiful. Just pitiful.
If you have to use “nicey-nice” words, phrases and ideas to get people to see the Truth then guess what? They are likely among the vast majority of those who are lost anyway. Being “positive” no matter the situation is a weak, WEAK, way to operate. Be caring, but be brutally truthful and dont placate sin.
Christ gave us what we need to know. It is not for us, who get it, to adopt weakness as a means of getting reprobates on the straight and narrow. We do what we can within reason to help people, and then we move on if we are wasting our time. We are called to convert souls but we are not called to sink to their level in order to do so. Be an example, not an enabler.
Well lookie here, AdolphusJr is back with the triple parentheses. Your Jew-hating has erupted again. Perhaps you can share our opinions on minorities, as 60657Cath doesn’t appear to have had the pleasure of your Nazi racial theories.
As I understand it, Iran launched missiles at Israel. I strongly encourage you to go join the Iranian army. Or the Israel army. Or anywhere else, really. It disgusts me to share the same Church (or continent) as you. When will you realize that the Church doesn’t teach this filth and stop trying to recruit others to your KKK chapter of one?
Louie is offering aka Catholics a promising alternative to the Traditional Catholic newspapers currently available. Any visitor to this blog knows Louie’s accurate analysis of the V2 revolution and the antics of the current hierarchy which is bringing the revolution to new heights. Bickering over the title of this newspaper demonstrates a lack of maturity and insults the intelligence of others who comment here. Those of us who see the necessity for this new endeavor should support Louie’s efforts and pray that the Holy Ghost guide him and his contributors every step of the way. If someone gives me much-needed emergency care which saves my life, I won’t complain about the color of his tie.
I will say that I will not consider subscribing if the contributors are allowed to denounce sedevacantism or consider those that adhere to the position as non-Catholic.
Blunder, Jews, like protestants, muslims, pagans, etc are not Catholic and therefore de facto evil religions and enemies of the True Faith. I am not sure why you seem to criticize a fellow Catholic who understands that all non Catholic religions are false ans evil and means of damnation. Their errors and lies should be exposed and we should proclaim to them the Truth and pray that God softens their hearts and they abjure their errors and join the Catholic Church. It is obvious that you disagree with Al Jrs method, and perhaps it is crass. But unless Al Jr starts uttering lies and falsehoods then let him evangelize his way and you evangalize your way. We do not change the Gospel to lessen the offense it may cause non believers. Preach always in season and out of season.
The sede issue is the elephant in the room. I hope Louie addresses it one way or the other. Even if one isnt convinced of sedevacantism, one should accept it as a valid opinion as to how we have gotten into this mess. To hold to the believe that a Pope can teach heresy is a heresy itself.
Thank you Mr. Verrecchio! I’m very much looking forward to this Publication. God bless you and all of your contributors, will keep you in my prayers.
Trying to reason with Grand Wizard AdolphusJr is a pointless exercise unless your goal is to be insulted, read volumes of bigoted filth and see him wave his triple parentheses around. The man is more Klan than Catholic. He despises Jews and minorities and gays, calls for apartheid and executions, and tells the world that this is in line with Catholic teaching. He’s very proud of coming up with “CatholiCuck”, will use it at every opportunity, and has added it to Urban Dictionary himself. He is a perfect example of what you’re saying about an off-putting name. He’s the ugly side of Traditonalism and actually works against it by putting a lunatic face on Traditon. Burning for truth does not mean hatred of your fellow man.
I still think Bread of Life would be the most clever name. Our enemies could not criticize it in any way, shape, or form. Over and out.
A pope can never teach heresy??
I’d like to suggest that you semi-PERMANENTLY post this article at the top of AKA’s website so that it’s always the very first article seen. People like me who don’t come to your site on a daily basis need to see this (and hopefully subscribe) so you can get to your 1,000 subscribers as quickly as possible. Just a thought.
Tom A & 2Vermont–It is my understanding that Louie has stated that as far as Bergoglio is concerned, he (Louie) does not believe he is the pope. Is this a misunderstanding?
Blunderbuss to the rescue again!
Blunder’s incessant white-knighting for every brand of heathen, especially perfidious Jews and sodomite perverts, shows that we DO NOT share the same religion. Blunder has been fully processed by the Judas Council and is thus full of boundless false compassion for every enemy of the Church, while pre-Judas Council Catholics (that is, actual Catholics) share my rejection of the perfidious Jews and sodomite perverts.
You’re not fooling us, Beelzebub.
Such a typically cucky concern with not being criticized in any way, shape, or form by worldlings. Cucks cower in fear of being criticized by wordings, not realizing that wordings will criticize the children of the light NO MATTER WHAT. And since weakness is provocative, the children of the devil only INCREASE their attacks once they smell cucky weakness.
The conservative traditionalist problem has been going on for awhile now. It’s not new.
However, since there’s money to be made from scandalized trads, the increased effort to highlight Pope Francis’ latest scandals will help bring in more dough.
A modernist is gonna do what a Modernist is gonna do. They can’t help it. To be continually shocked by the antics of Pope Francis shows the immaturity of some trads, and also shows that they have too much time on their hands. We already know that Francis is the worst pope ever.
Excellent video, Louie.
I will subscribe using the mail-in order form.
The Catholic Inquisitor: “While some might argue that the burden of proof is on those who would insist that Francis is not Catholic, they have it exactly backwards: their position being nothing more than a misapplication of the American juridical principle [i.e., “innocent until proven guilty”] […] The signs that attest to one’s membership in the Church must be eternally manifest, not determine via an examination of things otherwise hidden. In other words, ONE’S CATHOLICITY IS NOT PRESUMED; rather, it is made evident in an external, observable way. This isn’t my opinion, it is the criteria established by Holy Mother Church. ‘Now since its Founder willed this social body of Christ to be visible, the cooperation of all its members must also be externally manifest through their profession of the same faith and their sharing the same sacred rites, through participation in the same Sacrifice, and the practical observance of the same laws – Mystici Corporis 69.’ In light of the NECESSITY OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHURCH BEING MADE EXTERNALLY MANIFEST (“must be”), it is high time for those who insist that we are required to assume that ‘Francis is Catholic until …,’ often in condescending tones that only serve to reveal their own lack of conviction on this point, to put up or shut up.” (The external signs of Catholicity: Does Francis Qualify).
Comment: So, publicly presenting oneself as a Catholic, being viewed by Catholics and non-Catholics alike as a member by the Church, professing the Creed at Mass, receiving the Sacraments daily, etc. – all of which applies to Francis – does not suffice for the “external manifestation” necessary to presume he is a member of the Church? I think Pius XII (and all sane Catholics) would disagree.
But since you no doubt mean the “profession of faith” is not being sufficiently “manifest” in Francis case, I would note that the CAUSE of membership in the Church baptism. Baptism is the CAUSE that produces the EFFECT of making a person a member of the Church. The “profession of the same faith” is one of the CONDITIONS for membership; it is one of the social bonds of unity.
A baptized Catholic only ceases to be a member of the Church if one or more of the conditions are ruptured in a manner that is incompatible with the social bond of ecclesiastical unity, and the only thing that destroys the condition of “profession of the faith” to this extent is notorious heresy. Holding an erroneous or even heretical doctrine does not sever the social bond and cause of loss of membership in the Church, UNLESS THE HERESY IS NOTORIOUS. The renowned Louis Cardinal Billot, S.J., explains all this with precision and depth in his celebrated book, De Ecclesia Christi:
Louis Cardinal Billot, S.J., De Ecclesia: “Baptism of its very nature gathers men into the visible body of the Catholic Church; this EFFECT is always joined to it, UNLESS there be something in the recipient of baptism that prevents it — something incompatible with the social bond of ecclesiastical unity. Moreover, the social bond [belonging to the visible society], because it is social, is of it very nature external and manifest. As long, therefore, as heresy is not openly professed, but stays within the mind, OR IS CONFINED TO MANIFESTATIONS THAT DO NOT SUFFICE FOR NOTORIETY, it by no means prevents one from being joined to the visible structure of the Church; and by this fact the baptismal character (by which we are made to be of the body of the Church) necessarily continues to have its effect, or rather retains its natural corollary, since there is not yet anything contrary to impede or expel it. (…) WE MUST CONCLUDE THAT ONLY NOTORIOUS HERETICS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE BODY OF THE CHURCH”
So, if your position is that “Francis is not a Catholic” because you personally believe he has CEASED to be a member of the Church by breaking the CONDITION of “profession of the same faith,” the burden of proof is on YOU to demonstrate that he is notorious heretic, since only notorious heresy impedes the EFFECT produced by baptism to the extent necessary to bring about the loss of membership in the Church.
Furthermore, applying a little good old-fashioned common sense to your “presumption of guilt” theory shows that is absurd, since it would mean each Catholic would have to determine for himself if another professing Catholic’s “membership in the Church” had been “externally manifest” before he could accept him as a member of the Church. The result would be that each Catholic would have a “church” of his own, consisting only of those “members” whom he had personally examined and approved, and NECESSARILY (due to the presumption of guilt) excluding all others.
And to assert that Catholics should NOT PRESUME that the man elected pope during a conclave “is a Catholic,” until each one personally judges that his Catholicity has been “made evident in an external, observable way” is LUDICROUS, and destructive to the very foundations of the faith. Not only is it a complete novelty (the most evident mark of heresy), but how would Catholics who lived before the invention of the modern means of communication and travel ever do such a thing?
According to your idiotic theory, millions of Catholic peasants – most of whom couldn’t even read – would have to traveling thousands of miles on their donkey (along with their 12 kids and pregnant wife) to personal examine the pope’s orthodoxy before accepting him as pope. And they would have to repeat the fact-finding journey each time a new “pope” was elected (!) before they could submit to his as pope, which is necessary for salvation! See any problem with that?
And if the presumption of guilt apples to the current pope, it would logically apply to the previous popes as well. This would mean each Catholic – including those in the past who couldn’t read – would have to study every papal claimant in order to determine, to their own personal satisfaction, whether or not he sufficiently “manifest” his Catholicism before accepting his papacy – and before accepting any “dogmas” he defined or “council” he ratified!
All I can say is that the Editor of the Catholic Inquisitor ought to be happy he doesn’t live at a time when real Inquisitors walked the streets; for by spreading such an absurd doctrine in those days, he may very well have found himself in the public square, tied to a stake atop a pile of sticks. And this article made the front page, top of the fold?
So you don’t think the Jesuit heretics were clever in choosing the name America Magazine? I think they were, it was a smart move on their part. Very clever. They are battling for the same minds we are, the college-educated hedonist professionals who only care about their import SUVs and NCAA hoops and football results. So, does choosing a name like America result in more or less readership than a partisan name? I say more. It also makes their extremism appear mainstream. It’s clever.
Again you advocate emulating children of the devil. It’s better to emulate the children of the light and speak forthrightly, come what may. If feculent worldlings hate it, that’s a good sign!
“But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.” Mt. 5:37
No, I believe you stated Louie’s position correctly.
60657Cath, how can he? He wouldn’t be Catholic if he denies an article of the Faith. Would he? Every conciliar pope since 1958 has denied several articles of the Faith. From religious liberty, to ecumenism, to ecclesiology, the modernist philosophy has infected the entire structure save a very few.
Way too logical.
You need to start by looking around for the most extreme, radical Catholic group, then go much further than even they do. It’s a simple path: SSPX –> splinter SSPX –> SSPV –> Bennyvacantism –> Sedevacantism –> “True” Church is a remnant of perhaps a few –> Pope Michael –> I’m the only true Catholic left out of 7 billion people on the planet because I figured out what nobody else could and no this is totally not Gnosticism.
Before you start, it helps to turn off the rational part of your brain.
You’re correct. I’m a Roman Catholic. You appear to be from some sort of rural, bigoted sect, perhaps Westboro Baptist. You should save your ire for your Klan meetings where you’ll have an audience of like-minded people who agree with you and not try to spread it among Roman Catholics who reject this sort of blind hatred.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11126b.htm –A Catholic definition of Notorious.
Signing off on documents of Vatican 2, the Novus Ordo, the new Cathecism, the new Code of Canon Law, etc etc etc, is notorious. The conciliar popes themselves have declared their own heresy. No judgments or declarations are needed. With their pens they have admitted that they hold a faith that was not passed on to them from the Fathers of the Church. If you still think Ratizinger and/or Bergolio are Popes, then nothing will convince you otherwise.
Is there no end to your virtue-signaling, Beelzebub? We get it. Your thinking is kosher, fully approved by the (((Judas Council))), the (((ADL))), the (((SPLC))) and all the rest. You’re a Goodthinker, while we actual Catholics are Badthinkers. You’re fully processed. We get it.
Jorge isnt a pope….how can he possibly be the worst of something that he isnt? The author of this blog sees that.
If I’m not mistaken….isn’t there already a Novus Ordo publication called Bread of Life or something to that effect?
Yes, but there are those who believe that all of the Vatican II popes are false, not just the latest. Will contributors allow that form of sedevacantism or will it be condemned as non-Catholic?
The dreaded “bad” pope excuse.
Think about it: the visible head of the Catholic Church, the Vicar of Christ, teaching heresy to the entire Universal Church. How can that ever happen?
No, I’m a Roman Catholic. You are a bigoted ((((lunatic)))). Note that I’m using four, not three parentheses. That’s the secret code for ((((non-Catholic)))). You’re not a Badthinker. You’re a Know-Nothing.
Why do I find those “cuck” words so amusing. I smile every time I read them. I agree with you, and have to remind myself often that it does not pay to be so quick to capitulate to the culture, and that we should not weaken our stance so as to try not to offend the Left or gain approval, neither of which is ever going to happen, EVER. So you might as well go for broke.
oh my gosh, that is funny.
True! Until recently, haters could be disarmed fairly easily by just remaining sure of your convictions and sticking to them. This was when people were entitled to a differing opinion, in the good old days of circa-2016. Since President Trump was elected, the Communist Left has declared no one has a right to a differing opinion, and they are entitled to use whatever means available to shut you up. It’s going to increasingly be harder to even voice a differing opinion from the Communist Left as we proceed.
Wise words, and I don’t think he asked our opinion anyway.
It’s a funny word. And very powerful. Thus cuckservatives loathe it with every fiber of their being and, obeying their conditioning, often cry RAAAAAAACISSS whenever it’s used.
For more, see:
Cuckservatism: The Cuckoo In The Conservative Movement’s Nest https://www.vdare.com/articles/cuckservatism-the-cuckoo-in-the-conservative-movements-nest
Note that since the great Vdare site is listed by the perfidious (((SPLC))) as RAAAAAAAACISSSS, HOMOPHOOOOOBIC, ISLAMOPHOOOOBIC, TRANSPHOOOBIC and all the rest, any cucks reading this will definitely get their tutus ruffled. Wonderful!
Related, see this by the excellent Diana West:
Diana West Lecture – Cultural Marxism: Political Correctness
You could be thinking of this saccharine drivel from star Judas Conciliarist songwriter Marty Haugen:
Lamb of God – Bread of Life from Heaven
Nope. There is a magazine called “Bread of Life” …. but it’s Protestant. Novus Ordo, same difference.
Congratulations! This new traditional Catholic newspaper is a great development. I’ve already subscribed. I look forward to a newspaper that will have the same perspective as this blog, i.e., an uncompromising commitment to the truth of authentic Catholicism as well as a flexible approach filled with charity towards the different strains of traditional integrism, e.g. FFI, FSSP, SSPX, sedevacantism, etc. present amidst the current ecclesial confusion and crisis. Modernists are the only ones who gain when integrists are fighting each other or fighting conservatives.
A united orthodox Catholic movement, made up of different types of integrists and even different types of conservatives is needed to combat the heretical modernists currently in control of most ecclesiastical institutions.
I have significant objections to Church Militant, The Wanderer, and The Remnant but all these can and do provide valuable information on the chaos prevalent in the contemporary Church. Like the Holy League who defeated the Muslim Ottomans at Lepanto, integrists and conservatives need to put our differences aside and combat the real enemy, Modernists.
May the Lord bless this newspaper apostolate and may it serve as a place for all orthodox Catholics to have a safe cyber space to combat Moderism.
I just wanted to say “Happy Mother’s Day” to Our Blessed Mother.
I hope that’s not too far “off topic.”
We don’t have to wonder whether drive-by malignity will be scrubbed.
Our Lady is NEVER “off topic”. Thank you SanAntone. Our Lady, Mother of God, pray for us.
This is so exciting since I had canceled my subscription to the Remnant a while ago. Have emailed a few friends who may be receptive to this paper and have subscribed myself on day one! I am just wondering Louie, if you will still be maintaining akacatholic or if you will be including your blog articles in the new paper? Just was curious as this may definitely spur some folks on to subscribe if they can only read your articles in the paper. God Bless you!
I see your point. However, I hope Louie continues his blog. I enjoy his videos. The lively discussions in the comments help others to understand why Louie’s blog and newspaper are so important. No doubt, there will be comments on this blog re the articles in the newspaper. Personally, I skip over comments from certain people whose input is what I believe to be mean-spirited. God bless Louie and contributors to The Catholic Inquisitor. The name is perfect.
Hi Ever Mindful,
Good to see you back. I have missed your edifying contribution to the comments.
I see your point 2cents. Never thought of that. I do love to read the comments myself. I have learned quite a bit from them. Just like you, I skip over the same ones you do. Maybe he can do commentaries on the most pertinent articles that appear in the paper. I love the name too! God Bless!
A new day is dawning…as in Aquarius?
So far he remains silent on the “sede issue” with respect to this new venture.
Thank you for your unstinting dedication all these years to the True Faith. If there is anyone to take on a job like this, it is you. There is an expression regarding Polish and Italian Catholics — “like a dog with a bone”. Never give up and never lose heart. I know it has cost you. Please be assured of my prayers for you and this noble endeavor.
I just subscribed, and I’m looking forward to receiving this publication!
Thank you for doing this!
Ignatio, after ploughing through your essay may I simplify matters? Why not just say that if Bergoglio was taken to court for being a Catholic he’d be acquitted? See? Easy!