On Wednesday, June 20, 2018, the Archdiocese of New York released a statement saying that Cardinal Theodore McCarrick has been suspended from public ministry after an accusation that he sexually abused a minor (altar boy) while serving as a parish priest there nearly 50 years ago was deemed “credible and substantiated.”
Since then, Bishop James F. Checchio of Metuchen, and Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark issued statements revealing that both dioceses had “received three allegations of sexual misconduct [on the part of McCarrick] with adults decades ago; two of these allegations resulted in settlements.”
This is the same Joseph “Nighty-Night” Tobin who wrote:
In too many parts of our church LGBT people have been made to feel unwelcome, excluded, and even shamed. Father Martin’s brave, prophetic, and inspiring new book marks an essential step in inviting church leaders to minister with more compassion, and in reminding LGBT Catholics that they are as much a part of our church as any other Catholic.
It has also since come to light (see Rod Dreher’s articles linked below) that at least one of the incidents that resulted in a settlement involved McCarrick’s unwanted advances toward a seminarian in 1986 when he was Bishop of Metuchen.
So, let me get this straight (no pun intended): Powerful people in both dioceses – their bishops, and undoubtedly many others – have known for some time now that McCarrick is a homo-predator.
Did they tell anyone? If so, who did they tell? If not, why not?
The settlement (consisting of hard-earned money donated by the faithful) was paid out in 2006; the same year that Benedict XVI accepted McCarrick’s letter of resignation as the Archbishop of Washington, D.C. – something a bishop is required to submit, but the pope is not obligated to accept, upon reaching age 75.
Following McCarrick’s resignation, man’s man Donald Wuerl – who readers may recall suspended a faithful priest in 2012 for denying Holy Communion to a lesbian activist – was appointed by Benedict XVI to take over as Archbishop of Washington, D.C.; an office he continues to hold more than two full years after submitting his own letter of resignation, this time to Jorge “Who am I to judge” Bergoglio.
Well, then, it sure looks to me as if a deal was cut back in 2006 and there are gay finger prints all over it:
The pope agrees to accept McCarrick’s resignation letter upon receipt. The Diocese agrees to write a presumably hefty check to some victims. And all concerned agree to keep hush-hush about the entire affair.
Following McCarrick’s suspension last week, he issued a statement of his own; one that tells us everything that we need to know about creepy “Uncle Ted,” as he encouraged certain favored priests and seminarians to call him, while he, licking his chops, referred to them as his “nephews.”
While I have absolutely no recollection of this reported abuse, and believe in my innocence, I am sorry for the pain the person who brought the charges has gone through, as well as for the scandal such charges cause our people.
Imagine someone accusing you of sexually abusing an altar boy in the sacristy of a church. Heck, imagine someone accusing you of slapping an altar boy, or cussing him out, or stealing his wallet. I don’t care if the incident was alleged to have happened 90 years ago, if innocent, would you ever respond by saying “I don’t recall that reported abuse.”
Writing for the American Conservative, Rod Dreher has posted two articles (HERE and HERE) that provide important historical background on McCarrick and his widely known homosexual appetite.
In response to McCarrick’s statement, Dreher wrote, “Innocence? I believe McCarrick is lying, and that he knows he is lying.”
Maybe so, but I suspect that McCarrick has internally absolved himself of lying by virtue of the fact that he most likely does not remember that abuse. I mean, there’s no telling how many altar boys’ genitals he fondled over the years. How can he possibly be expected to remember that kid?
In any event, in spite of some tripe about the role celibacy may be playing in these cases of homo-clerics gone wild, Dreher’s articles are well worth reading (if you can stomach the unseemly details).
Dreher tells readers that he has “been waiting for this story to break since 2002.”
Back then, I received a tip from a priest who had gone on his own dime to Rome, along with a group of prominent US Catholic laymen, to meet with an official for the Roman Curial congregation that names bishops. It had been rumored at the time that Theodore McCarrick, the Archbishop of Newark, was going to be moved to Washington, DC, and to be made a cardinal.
This group traveled to Rome to warn the Vatican that McCarrick was a sexual harrasser of seminarians. The story this priest shared with me was that McCarrick had a habit of compelling seminarians to share his bed for cuddling. These allegations did not involve sexual molestation, but were clearly about unwanted sexual harassment. To refuse the archbishop’s bedtime entreaties would be to risk your future as a priest, I was told.
The story never made it print, ultimately, because none of the accusers with whom Dreher spoke were “willing to put their name to public accusations.”
With this in mind, he concludes one of his articles with a passionate plea:
A word for all you Catholic priests and laymen who contacted me 16 years ago about Cardinal McCarrick, and told me what you knew, but who would not go on the record about it — it is time for you to find your voice. Speak up. Tell what you know. The young men who had to suffer this pervert’s attentions all these decades deserve to have their pain acknowledged and vindicated.
Fair enough, but what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Dreher also relates the following:
It might surprise you to learn that the person who tried to get me taken off the McCarrick trail back in 2002, was a prominent conservative layman, a closeted gay man who intervened at his dear friend the Cardinal’s request.
Speaking for myself, no, this does not surprise me in the least. In fact, one person in particular comes to my mind as perhaps being the “closeted gay man” in question – a “conservative layman” of some note in Washington, D.C. in those days (and even more so today), and whose “prominence” rose considerably during the early years of Cardinal McCarrick’s tenure as its Archbishop.
Of course, I could be dead wrong.
If only Mr. Dreher would be willing to do as he counsels others to do, however, there would be no question.
So, Mr. Dreher:
It is time for you to find your voice. Speak up. Tell what you know. Who is this prominent conservative layman? What is the nature of his relationship with McCarrick? In what other ways did this man perhaps leverage his prominence in order to influence others to keep the Church’s gay network a secret?
We’re all familiar with the old saying about the way in which to get to the bottom of institutional and political scandals: Follow the money. It’s good advice.
Today, it is becoming increasingly undeniable that when it comes to the inner workings of the Catholic Church, the way to gain clarity is not just to follow the money, but to follow the fairies.
Dr. Richard Sipe, “a psychiatrist and former Benedictine monk who has treated scores of sexually abusive priests” was cited by Rod Dreher in reference to the Church’s “gay network” as stating:
I’ve reviewed over 100 cases of sexual abuse by priests. In there you get the documentation, which unfortunately often gets sealed by the Church after they settle the cases. It’s very clear that you can trace [the network], one person to another, through a sequence of appointments, the sequence of who follows whom in what position, and how they got there. It is a fact, and nobody can sincerely deny it.
That effort is well beyond the scope of this article, but I must say that I find it at least noteworthy that one Father Kevin Farrell was consecrated a bishop in 2002 by Cardinal McCarrick of Washington, D.C., serving as one of its auxiliaries until his appointment as Bishop of Dallas in 2007.
“The news of the appointment of Bishop Kevin Farrell as bishop of the large and important Diocese of Dallas is a great tribute to the talent, the experience and, in a special way, to the tremendous pastoral abilities of this faithful and gifted priest,” McCarrick wrote at the time.
“He is a good friend and has been a great brother to me,” McCarrick concluded.
Brother? Would it perhaps have been more fitting to call him a nephew?
In 2016, Farrell was appointed Prefect of the Bergoglian Curial creation called the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life, and he was made a cardinal – just like Uncle Ted – shortly thereafter.
Speaking of Fr. James Martin’s book, Building a Bridge: How the Catholic Church and the LGBT Community Can Enter into a Relationship of Respect, Compassion, and Sensitivity (perhaps better named Clerical Homo-Activism for Dummies), Farrell offered the following glowing endorsement:
[It is] a welcome and much-needed book that will help bishops, priests, pastoral associates, and all church leaders more compassionately minister to the LGBT community. It will also help LGBT Catholics feel more at home in what is, after all, their church.
Yes, more and more, it is starting to look like “their church.”
The Diocese of Wilmington (DE) has a remarkably well written puff-piece which essentially is a defense of McCarrick. No mention of the abhorrent behavior whatsoever. Why in our Diocese newsletter I don’t know, as far as I can tell he had no direct ties to the Wilmington. Guess its just a case of the pack protecting its own. At least now they can say Diocese of Wilmington has been properly evangelized WRT this topic.
Well, their church stole every stitch of property from the Catholic Church and defrauded parishioners of their tithes for over 50 years. Oh and also vandalized all of our property along with raping our children. Every building will need to be exorcised and reconsecrated, or whatever they need to do when something holy has been defiled. And still we all discuss amongst ourselves over coffee. WTH, is there no legal recourse, can nobody investigate that bogus conclave? Whatever conspiracy produced this fraud, they were men that make mistakes, they leave a paper trail, they cheat on their taxes, they’ve got a digital trail, too.
Its their “fake” church.
I think “fake” is the most benign thing their fraud is. I can’t believe what a fool I was for so long. How the heck did they pull this off? In 1,958 years nobody managed to rid the Church of her head and these sons of guns pulled off this heist without us even realizing. And now that we become aware, are we without recourse? Have we lost apostolic succession? We’ve got a ton of valid but illicit clergy right? They need to get into conclave and get us a Pope. And SSPX if you people do NOT stop playing along with this scam you are going to be in some serious trouble when you meet St. Peter at the pearly gate, so you’d better just stop it, right now.
Nobody knew how many seminarians were gay even 30 years ago. I had an unforgettable discussion with one of the transitional deacons of the Class of 1986 of a Midwest Seminary that out of a class of approximately 15 soon-to-be-ordained men, 4 were straight.
Today, two (out of 3) of our own parish priests are gay and there are many in our diocese, possibly even the bishop. It is indeed “their church:” they have the positions of power.
Our pastor was “outed” a few years back when his “significant other” priest friend was arrested for unlawful homosexual activity in the community. But, he remains in his position and it’s business as usual.
Our parish has a mantra that is often stated by the celebrant at the beginning of Mass– with banners also at the entrance– “All are welcome.” The months ahead– especially with Bergoglio’s example– this parish could easily adopt an openly “gay friendly” program. Indeed, I can envision the day when whole dioceses will tout this.
Richard, that’s not Catholic.
We’ll leave the parish if that were to happen, of course.
Richard, are you saying that the Pastor at your church, that you go to every Sunday, is an open sodomite?
What’s his name?
They remain very close friends, as far as I know. When his friend was exposed in the newspapers, no explanation was ever given to the parish, though the friendship was common knowledge.
Oh my word. Is there somewhere in the Bible that says, go out from her my people? I feel like a Protestant has said this before. Yeah, I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess that “her” was a fake sodomy church. A sodomy church. That is beyond depraved. I really don’t think that Catholics should attend the sodomites’ church, I really don’t.
“Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they [sodomites] who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.”
-Romans 1:32
My purpose in these comments was not to drop names, but to show how widespread the gay priest percentage was even 30 years ago. The Midwest Seminary I referenced was an institution that taught seminarians from around the United States.
They’re not “gay.” They’re stinking sodomites. The word “gay” was introduced to morally neutralize, indeed to morally invert, their hellish depravity. Don’t go along with this Orwellian linguistic inversion.
Related:
Tactics of the Homosexual Movement
https://catholiccitizens.org/views/59962/tactics-of-the-homosexual-movement/
Notice that that excellent article has, since John Vennari’s death, been purged from the Catholic Family News site where it originally appeared. Is there a sodomite infestation of Catholic Family News?
That’s good Richard. I don’t think there is any need to drop names anymore. I think one can safely assume any of the sodomites’ new order church pastors are sodomites. I’m out of her. Good grief!
Melanie and AlphonsusJr , at the bottom of the last post I tried to explain to Melanie why our one time Doctor friend went off the rails . I included a recent email conversation I had with a catholic lawyer friend. He quotes Fr Ripperger of the Order of Exorcists, who says exactly what AlphonsusJr states above but goes even farther explaining exactly why .
Melanie and Richard,
It is said to be at least 70% that are according to one priest a few years back.
I believe I already posted the quote and source a few days ago.
Alphonsus…that is the bible scripture I think of when I hear others teaching that homosexuals were born that way.
That is exactly what rang in my head from the Apoclaypse Melanie after our last experiences with a sodomite cross dressing pastor , ( now the secretary for the Melkite Bishop ) He clearly and openly denied the Real Presence while pointing to the tabernacle during a homily. “God is not in the box so do not pray to him there. He is in the person standing next to you.”
Really? I might be standing next to someone like him! Does God reside with a demoniac?
Ya know what Sweep? Anytime I am in the vicinity of a sodomite, I always say the St. Michael’s prayer. I will do this whenever I drive past one of their fake churches now as well. What a demonic mess; Stephen King couldn’t make up a horror story like this and I think he may have had a direct line to the demonic. I remember when I read Hostage to the Devil, a part of one of the possessions was exactly like one part of a Stephen King novel that I had read. I thought to myself, I really hope that King got this idea from this book, otherwise he’s got some bad Angels.
Why would a straight seminarian who has been abused this way want to become a priest in a church that is obviously filled with homosexuals? My neighbor’s son is a priest in the V2 church. She confided in me that when her son was a seminarian, he come home to visit with his seminarian friends. She couldn’t understand why these friends were so effeminate. I think we know why. It’s infested. Stay away.
Ok I’m just speaking for myself, not wanting to influence anyone, but I would not be attending that church. I’d rather watch the Mass on TV every Sunday, at least I wouldn’t have to put up with that nightmare.
I could be wrong, but eventually these men are going to kill the goose they need for golden eggs. I do realize they have billionaire atheists writing checks, and the US federal government gives them lots of coin to bring in Muslims to our communities, but eventually, the people in the pew are going to stop coming. Once the gays take over the Church openly, they will lose interest in it and stop attending. Non-gay people will stop long before that, like around now, and my sense is that’s happening.
How long can you shake down a goose that’s out of eggs?
I agree with you, for our own spiritual and mental health, and to avoid giving scandal to others. If we attend this sodomite church, it tells the un-churched that THIS is the Roman Catholic Church, which it is NOT.
Here’s a horror thought, as if we needed any others. What is the likelihood of a traditionalist priest that offers the TLM being an active homosexual. This is something not usually mentioned.
Honestly, until we have a Pope, I am assuming any priest valid or not is a sodomite and offering an illicit mass. I’m going to Mass when the Pope tells me what men are valid and licit Priests. Until such time, I am saying the Rosary and praying unceasingly that my family’s souls are saved even if we live through the Apocalypse. I can’t believe that I’m living in this time, of all the times, what are the chances? I have no problem saying to all mothers, you should not allow your boys unsupervised contact with any priest of any stripe on the face of the earth, I don’t care if he appears to be a living saint. And I wouldn’t allow altar serving even if the training is by older boys, NO WAY. Adults can assist, let them. No camps or slumber parties either, CRAZY.
Two blog posts ago, it was the Novus Ordo Mass that ruined the Church and Vatican II was the work of Jews and Freemasons who control literally everything in the world and all the money.
But today it appears to be the gays who are responsible for everything.
See what I mean about conspiracy theory on top of conspiracy theory?
Does anyone here actually think about what they say or do they just regurgitate stuff they read on the Internet?
Also good to see that we’ve now moved beyond individual slander and onto smearing 70% of the clergy based upon the indisputable word of “one priest several years back.”
Extrapolating this to the assertion the entire visible Catholic Church having disappeared is utter stupidity.
But let’s say you’re right and nearly every priest and he entire leadership of the Church are super-duper gay. We know this has been an issue for at least a thousand years. Remind me why married priests are a problem?
Much pertinent info on the sodomite infestation is to be found here:
Catholics and the Jew Taboo
https://www.amazon.com/Catholics-Jew-Taboo-Michael-Jones/dp/1983166510/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1529972549&sr=8-1
Scroll down the memory lane to the year 2003 -2018 A.D.
http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/ChurchRevIndex.htm
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a01Pedophilia_crisis.htm
On the Sex Scandal:
Ratzinger Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Here’s an anecdote Evangeline. Couple yrs ago, NOW put out a warning on Twitter that a Fr. Gregory Safreed was real cagey when asked about his ordination details & then shut down his Twitter account.I looked him up bc I followed this priest & could have sworn I’d checked Lux Vera before following.Lo & behold, he had a YouTube channel w/sedevacantist videos interspersed about equally w/videos of men defecating on a toilet or something along that lines, something you’d never imagine existed.I informed LV right away & they contacted him.Welp, turns out everything was A-Okay; Fr. Safreed didn’t know how those videos got on there but he shut down his YouTube Channel right away.Accoring to LV these things happen to people all the time and some people have had their lives really damaged by things like this.
Michael Voris.
They are there too. Recall Urrutigoity ( still running around S America in good standing), Ensey ( defrocked) Marshall Roberts ( praised by Hewko and Pfieffer in their Resistance).Then there is the sspx seminarian who became a camp counselor in Post Falls, Idaho sspx enclave and several in Europe which Williamson was questioned about.
2 Vermont……and Voris was shown the door when he attended Dunwoody Seminary. Secretive ones are given a wink. Overt are on their own and the ones shown the door are considered overly overt or they are infected with HIV and it is known.
What has been exposed regarding this pervert evil inside the catholic church is horrific. Imagine what we don’t know! Terrifying!
Randy Engel-W.H. Kennedy interview Homosexuals in the Catholic Hierarchy 1/2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs1rRZJNlDQ
Randy Engel- W.H.Kennedy interview Homosexuals in the Catholic Hierarchy 2/2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqF6tZ_0RaM
This hasnt been a problem for “at least a thousand years”….thats utter garbage. Some are always deviants….not the vast majority of them like it is today.
Married priests cannot be fully committed to the salvation of souls had they a family to concern themselves with. Thats my common sense answer to a stupid question.
This perversion is of the vatican 2 church. The seeds were planted long before 1965, yes, but it was allowed to become the norm when the vatican 2 church took control of Rome. This perversion is not of the Catholic Church.
Absolutely Rich, This perversion was very purposefully injected into the Church to accomplish a stealth hostile takeover. Bella Dodd testified before the US Senate in 1953 that this was accompished by the Communist Party. Is any mental defective wondering right now why the fake sodomite church is COMMUNIST? It’s communist not Catholic.
I know more than I ever wanted to and so does Randy. I have leaned on her for support. When she wrote RoS and the Sirico Brief she was inundated with calls.
I experienced the same and still do on a smaller scale. Thank God because sometimes it is overwhelming . You cry for priests and other times for children and their families. She told me recently when she gets angry she will pound the dirt in her gardens . Randy has award winning gardens. Any wonder?
She said when she is overwhelmed with emotion she prays rosaries.
Dreher said he received many emails and calls after he wrote the piece on McCarrick. Victims both seminarians priests and parents just want to talk to other Catholics who know. It is cathartic. It is very deep pain because it is spiritual too and an ultimate betrayal .Add to it , most other Catholic friends and relatives do not want to hear about it. Many defend the perp priest because they say he is “holy”. Friends become former friends . If you have a sense of community with other Catholics ,it is destroyed.
Added to their suffering is reading stupid comments like ,”…the victims are just after money” or reading the Editorials by high paid bishop’s mouth pieces like Bill Donahue of the so called Catholic League. or maybe you are smearing good priests or committing “calumny”. Today I rec’d a call from a woman infuriated and in tears after communicating with a priest who praises Dolan.
See Trad Fave St. Peter Damian re: gay priests.
Eastern Rite and Orthodox Church – valid sacraments – say married priests OK.
Apostles married.
Your argument: it’s “stupid” because I say it is.
Change baaaad.
Ok then.
Stop right there, mister! You’re in violation of the new evangelical penile code against being mean spirited and judgement. No H8 and get woke!
@LOLPuss
Vatican II and the new Mass are the works of its agents…the groups you relentlessly defend who are at war with God and His mystical body. Their efforts found traction because an overwhelmingly large portion of the laity and priests were and are trying to live in both the City of God and the City of Man.
Yes, Bella Dodd is someone who all true Catholics should know. She laid it out for us over a 60 years ago.
You’ve had all of these experiences no one else has, and know things that no one else does. It’s almost like you have some sort of hidden knowledge. What’s the word for that, again…? I
Thank you for the image of Randy Engel beating the Crabgrass of Satan into submission. LOL
On a more serious note:
Hysteria doesn’t equal faith. This is nothing more than a Trad version of the Charismatic Movement.
Reality is that having and holding the Faith is a grind. Every day is tough. You slip, you fall, you get back up.
Getting to heaven doesn’t involve a stop on the elite fainting couch for most. The video you posted of the “Holy Spirit” appearing was the moon behind clouds. You’re preaching superstition. You’re misleading people.
In the next life, I’m hoping I’m able to hear your explanation when you’re asked “so, you spent your life telling people not to go to Mass. Explain.”
I said that there have ALWAYS been deviants in the Church….this is true anywhere. You make it seem though as if the total takeover of the Church by gays has been the norm for 1000 years. This is not the case. This is recent.
What apostle remained in contact with his wife after electing to follow Christ? Why was it determined that priests should remain unmarried in the first place? (please dont give me the “so the Church could inherit their worldly possessions without having to deal with a wife” argument).
I’d like to add one more thing and that is: I think that the communists could have filled every seminary w/sodomites and been entirely unable to takeover the Catholic Church as it is not a business but a Divine Institution. I don’t know how they did it but they impeded the election of a Pope. That is the only way they could possibly have deceived the entire body of Christ w/a new false religion that continues to be revealed in all it’s grotesque form. If we’re in end times, I’m okay w/that but if we could realize our situation as the body of Christ and somehow elect a Pope, I’d dearly love to leave this world with the graces of the Sacraments. Maybe the Lord would even forestall the end if we’d wake up from this deception and display faithfulness to Christ the King. Show Him that we can recognize the difference between Him and the Devil.
“WHITE LEFT” : China’s New Internet INSULT – Bugmen
https://youtu.be/1zoomb3qptg?t=10s
I dont know if it (the takeover) necessarily relied upon the simple improper election of a false pope so much as it relied on the infiltration of the Church, and the time it took to get evil men in the position to vote. Are you referring to Card Siri?
Even evil men can name a true Pope. The main points, as always, are if the election is valid and thereafter, if said validly elected pope does not become a formal heretic.
Its very complicated even for the most knowledgeable among us. This is why vatican 2 HAS to be of Satan. Our Lord would not sow this much confussion
Mystery, yes. Confusion, no.
All sodomite clergy must be defrocked, beginning with bishops, indeed with Bergoglio. If that reduces their numbers by 60%, 80%, 99% — so be it.
Agreed. And this should be just the beginning.
One thing we know for sure. If anyone experiences a clerical assault NEVER go to the Bishop or report it to the Diocese first. Always, always report it to the police and then get a lawyer and have the lawyer report it to the Diocese. The Diocesan reporting offices for sexual abuse is not there to protect you or your child .They were established to protect the financial and legal interests of the Diocese.
I agree with Frank III , if the institutional Church is to be in it’s right mind serving the sheep as Christ on earth, they must sweep out the filth.
“An affidavit recently obtained by INA Today attributes the Catholic Church’s present state of collapse to a calculated attack beginning decades ago, with initial successes appearing in the 1960s.
The affidavit affirms that Communist Party organizer and high Party official, Bella Dodd, made public statements during the decade of the 1960s declaring that the Catholic priesthood was infiltrated by numerous Communist agents, whose mission was “to destroy the Catholic Church from within.”
“In an exclusive interview with INA Today, Catholic philosopher Dr. Alice von Hildebrand confirmed that Dodd had made the remarks, and provided the affidavit from Paul and Johnine Leininger, who witnessed Dodd making the public statements.
When contacted by INA Today, Mrs. Johnine Leininger stated that there were others who could also verify that Dodd made the statements regarding infiltration into Catholic seminaries.
Dr. von Hildebrand told INA Today that Dodd had earlier refrained from detailing Communist efforts to undermine the Catholic priesthood at the request of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, the individual responsible for bringing Dodd back into the Church.
Dodd’s infiltrators would have reached their highest positions of power and influence in the early to mid-60’s, the period which saw the initial doctrinal and moral collapse within the Catholic Church.”
http://www.inatoday.com/20030728.htm
I was sent a copy of the same notarized affadavit of the couple in Texas with a note from Alice that homosexuals were the only CP members who would take on the assignment. Dodd traveled around the country holding seminars for Catholics at the time warning them of what she knew and accomplished as a member of the Communist Party.
I asked the same question Louie asks of Dreher. Why did Fulton Sheen instruct Dodd to keep those names secret?
Note their highest positions of influence arrived right in time for Vatican Two.
“The process of Communist infiltration into Catholic seminaries, which Dodd described in her public talks, would have been part of a larger plan called “Outstretched Hand.”
Communist Party archives in Moscow confirm the existence of operation “Outstretched Hand,” and define its goals, according to Herbert Romerstein, author of the seminal work on Soviet espionage in the United States before, during, and after WWII, “The Venona Secrets.”
At least one Soviet agent directly involved in “Outstretched Hand” is identifiable.
One document in Moscow’s Soviet archives reveals that the Communist Party had infiltrated several influential Catholic organizations, including the Holy Name Society, the largest parish-oriented Catholic men’s group, which is devoted to increasing reverence for the name of God and to good works in the Church and in society in general. A Holy Name Society chapter exists in almost every Catholic parish in the U.S.
The same document acknowledged the existence of a certain “Party comrade,” who was “well known” in “conservative Irish Catholic circles” and who held offices “in various Catholic organizations�”
The “Party comrade” operated in a key parish which provided “leadership” and shaped “the policies of most of the reactionary and anti-Communist campaigns that are now developing in the Catholic world,” according to the Soviet file.
Romerstein also recounts in The Venona Secrets that the staff of the Catholic anti-Communist publication entitled Wisdom, produced by a priest of the Paulist order, was infiltrated, and unknowingly employed two Communist agents in influential positions.
The Party boasted that one of their agents was “widely known to be a conservative in Irish circles,” and was a staff correspondent for Wisdom. Romerstein identified the Party member and Soviet agent as Jeremiah F. O’Carroll, who, in 1930, was the president of the Irish Emergency Relief organization.”
I am reminded here of the CCHD and what Laponto Institute uncovered about that Catholic “charitable” organization.
“The most recent – and notorious – incident of hostile infiltration into the U.S. Catholic Church is that of veteran FBI agent and convicted spy, Robert Hanssen. While placing his nation in mortal danger through his espionage activities, Hanssen also was believed to be a fervent Catholic.
Hanssen led a double life of betrayal, while serving as a spy for both the Soviet and “reformed” regimes in Moscow. ‘ ”
Hanssen was of course FBI and a member of Opus Dei and attended St Catherine of Sienna TLM Church in VA. served by priests of the OD Prelature . Louis Freeh and Paul Weyrich also attended this parish. Weyrich was considered one of the 100 most influential men in DC and was credited with influencing Reagan to run for President. Weyrich was also a member of Opus Dei.
Just a FYI.
My experiences are not all that unique .Others have walked the same path. Only difference is I am willing to make them public along with a hand full of other people who love their Faith so much, they are not willing to see it destroyed by the likes of a liberal loon sodomite sympathizer whom we all know and are making an effort to ignore here in spite of his goading.
Lights on and watch the cuckroaches run.
In seminary, my priest got counseled because he was too rigid and not flexible in how he viewed things. The head of the seminary pointed to exemplary seminarians that were, unsurprisingly, of the San Francisco mindset. My priest did not conform and was subsequently booted. Fortunately, he found a Traditional seminary and got ordained.
If you cannot trust the institutional conciliar church with your young sons, why would you trust them with the sacraments or your salvation? Christ said if one cannot be trusted in small matters, they cannot be trusted in larger matters. Yet over and over we see countless trads rightly point out all the problems with the conciliar imposters yet every Sunday off they go to let these same imposters destroy their souls and the souls of their families from their pulpits. There simply is no good gained by associating with the NO sect on Sunday or any day.
All of this reminds me of “Goodbye, Good Men” by Michael Rose. If I remember correctly (I read this about 5 or 6 years ago), it doesn’t go into the larger issue of Vatican II, but it clearly shows the infestation in the seminaries.
I should add that the seeds of disdain towards his rigidity, and lack of flexibility, were born in my priest’s approach to Mass. The Novus Ordo and rigidity are like oil and water. Maximum depth in the Novus Ordo can only be achieved by maximum flexibility in one’s outlook on theology and philosophy, thus it comes as no surprise that most of the Novus Ordo superstars fight the rigidity of nature.
One glaring error in Rose’s book was to say that St Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philadelphia was one of the good ones. for years friends of mine in the Catholic home school movement wondered why nice young men who were praised at the pulpit because they were headed there, suddenly left and never showed up at church again. Then hanks to the DA a GJ Investigation took place which revealed the horrors.
A friend ,working as a DRE out of a popular parish rectory told me about the homosexual who employed her and the lavish parties going on in his rectory. gathered together were the sodomites who graduated together from St Charles B and who flourished under Bishop James McHugh . Monisgnore Lynn was among them whom she heard screaming he did not want to take the fall for C Bevilaqua.
Well he did and was sent to jail for shredding the subpoenaed secret files. Bevi claimed dementia but was oft seen on the gold course.
Then when it came time for him to testify he was visited by a court appointee in his “lavish” apartments in st Charles seminary. They found him well enough to testify but that night…..he died. Interestingly his hospice nurse was quoted as saying he expired when she was outside his door and later as having passed as she held his hand at his bedside.
Last read St Charles Borromeo was up for sale.
“Because President Donald Trump opposes the pedophile maggot culture, the hatred against him is intensifying”
https://lasalettejourney.blogspot.com/2018/06/because-president-donald-trump-opposes.html
“As reported here, “Donald Trump has vowed to tackle the child abduction crisis in the United States by giving pedophiles a fast trial resulting in the death penalty. In October of 2012, Donald Trump tweeted that there are ‘too many incidents’ and something ‘must be done about these perverts.'”
This is yet another reason why the “cultural elites” who represent our maggot culture want to destroy Trump at any cost. They secretly, and sometimes not so secretly, are in favor of pedophilia.
It should come as no surprise that The New York Times published a 1,225-word obituary entitled “Harry Hay, Early Proponent of Gay Rights, Dies at 90.” For, as Dudley Clendinen wrote in this long eulogy, Hay was the founder of the Mattachine Society which, “proved to be the catalyst for the American gay rights movement.” (Dudley Clendinen, “Harry Hay, Early Proponent of Gay Rights, Dies at 90,” The New York Times, October 25, 2002).
Harry Hay, who deserted the Catholic Church after having homosexual relations at the age of 14 (with a sailor ten years his senior), was himself a proponent of man-boy sex and gave a speech at an October 7, 1984 conference of NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) in San Francisco.”
Harry Hay spoke frequently at NAMBLA events and periodically came to the defense of the organization when other homosexual groups attempted to prevent it from partipating in “Gay Pride” parades.
So, one of the founders – some would say the founder – of the American “gay rights” movement, was a proponent of sexual relations between men and boys. Why doesn’t this trouble those in the mainstream media? Because the mainstream media has bought fully into the radical homosexual agenda and is incapable of any objectivity whatsoever with regard to the subject of homosexuality.
Within the Church, homosexuals and pedophiles are now in control and are most anxious to have young boys served up to satisfy their filthy desires. See here.
A Cardinal who preyed upon boys has finally been removed. The question remains: What did the Vatican know and when? See here.
Pray for President Trump. He is a man who hasn’t bought into the Culture of Pederasty. And, because of this, those who have embraced the filth hate him. Even to the point of suggesting that his son should be served up to pedophiles. See here.”
Hence, sweepoutthefilth !
Because there will be NO TRUE renewal of the Traditional Catholic Faith until it is accomplished.
The Modernist “official” institutional catholic (?) church is no an instrument of true Catholicism. I hope and pray the new Superior General of the SSPX will publicly admit this and announce that “regularization” is no longer a goal. July 11-21 will be a defining moment in the SSPX. I’m not holding out much hope, but prayer is still the answer.
The thing is Rich, the Church has always been made up of men, so there’s always been an infiltration. The election of John XXIII was not valid and I know this because he did not have the protection of the Holy Ghost. He opened a council that would present a new anti-religion. I do think that +++Siri was elected. In 1958 there existed a new threat that had never been at the disposal of the enemy before and that was the nuclear bomb. I believe that the Pope was threatened w/it’s use. It’s the only thing I can see that was unique to this time. I read of someone proposing this and I’m sure he was much maligned as a conspiracy theorist, I’ll try to find it again. But, I mean, if that were true, it’s not complicated, it’s just so evil that it’s kind of unthinkable, no?
I’m not a “liberal loon sodomite sympathizer”. I’m a person who goes to Mass and believes that you don’t have to be an alt-right wacko to be a good Catholic.
I don’t blindly repeat stuff I read on the Internet. The whole Bella Dodd thing just doesn’t make sense. The idea that this massive, perfect conspiracy was somehow pulled off with only one person saying anything and that same person never revealing any names smacks of fabrication. Kind of like allegedly unrevealed Fatima secrets. Remarks about “affidavits” and that there are those – always unnamed – who can verify this stuff ring hollow.
Also, this allegedly successful and perfect and successful plan has resulted in nearly 4x the number of Catholics worldwide over the past hundred years. But maybe you’re taking a page from the Book of Adolphus and only looking at white Catholics.
Blunderbuss,
What is your definition of an “alt-right wacko”? What proof do you have that Bella Dodd is a liar?
The majority of modern Catholics (at least in the US) believe that divorce, contraception, homosexuality, and even abortion are permissible. Who cares how many “Catholics” there are if most are bound for hell? Telling us how the “Catholic” population increased over the last century (as did the world population in general…lol) might be the lamest defense EVER of the vatican 2 false church Ive ever heard.
In our last Diocese the sodomites all partied together and other priests also came who we all thought were straight. When their Bishop protector was transferred and later died , they also were scattered.Some with important positions other than just parish pastors went elsewhere . One to Ave Maria land. Another left the priesthood and participated in a showy homosexual public engagement and marriage all recorded for posterity on you tube.
Word was getting out who was who and the more obvious ones were tucked safely away in Hispanic newly immigrant parishes.
One was sent off to Rome as rector of a seminary there and has now returned as Bishop to a Diocese that issued a statement on McCarrick.
Several joined the Knights of the Holy Sepulchre and also cater heavily to the KoC whom they see as staunch defenders.
Now what most of you do not understand is that when a priest with good cause seeks redress from secular courts, he almost always loses if it involves internal Church policies , like who is being punished for doing the right thing and alerting authorities concerning fellow clerics who are pederasts . They have been lied about and punished by their own Bishops and the secular courts do not have the capacity to rule on this since it is considered “internal policy of a religious institution”. They can however, in cases of assault on their persons, go to the authorities. But most do not since that it very hard to prove and it usually means an end to their vocation anyway.
So many have either left the priesthood or lingered in suspended animation for years going through the Vatican’s court systems.
If a man seeks to become a priest and later finds he is surrounded in seminary or rectory internship before he is Ordained and leaves, more often than not he is required to pay thousands and thousands back for his seminary and college education.
The signatures on the copy of the notarized document Alice von Hildebrand circulated were Mr and Mrs Mrs. Leininger .
The husband is deceased now and only Mrs. Johnine Leininger was alive at the time.The couple heard Bella Dodd speak to a Catholic group of 600 people and thought to have what they heard notarized and testified to for posterity. They were wise enough to foresee what was going to happen.
Back when Fr Malachi Martin was still alive he told me he rec’d multiple reports that SSPX parishes were being undermined by usually single men who posed as businessmen. He said the same thing was being told to him by those who attended independent Trad Chapels. One man , in particular from a ” former ” communist country in Europe was taking names of families who attended an SSPX chapel in Texas .A woman called me asking me if I knew anything more about him because people there felt uncomfortable about the lists he was making. He claimed he had been a communist dissident in his own country of the Czeck Republic and had been jailed. That was not true.In fact , he was known to be working for the then KGB prior to the Velvet Revolution.. Apparently, he fooled many Traditionalists here . When he first arrived he sat next to a friend of mine at a Catholic dinner and claimed he was a home school father .She asked how many children he had and he responded only one who was 2 years old at the time.He even managed to get speaking engagements with the HSLDA.
Blunder – I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – you are not a Catholic. if you are a Catholic I’m married to George Clooney!
Read the ‘Alta Vendita’ Freemason’s handbook – which was dragged out from the depths of Satanism 50 years ago, and shown the light of day by the wonderful Father Luigi Villa.
The A.V. outlines the Freemason plot to destroy the Catholic Church by pushing LBGTQ particularly among priests and out Youth. Along with the Russian Communists who sent 1100 young men into seminaries to actively spread homosexuality to damage the Church.
“Conspiracy” is a word used as a defense mechanism for those who hate the truth – or who don’t have the integrity to accept the truth. God reward Fr Villa[hand-picked by St Padre Pio to take up his battle against Freemasonry and appointed by Pope Pius XII] and God reward John Venarii for making this awful handbook available to all of us.
Praying and looking forward to see what happens with this as well.
I found it! The Atomic Bomb and the Eclipse of the True Vicar of Christ by Gary Giuffre. It’s from Chiesa Viva July-Aug 2015.
If the hetero priests of the NO were real men and not spineless jelly fish, they would not tolerate sodomites in their ranks, bishop or not. They would rebel and would be perfectly justified under Divine Law to have absolutely no association with sodomites. We are not talking about the kind of human weakness and sin common to all. We are talking about sodomites. A sin so disgusting and abominable, that God Himself has told us that it cries out for vengeance. The fact that the NO hetero “priests” tolerate these perverts in their ranks is a testimony to their lack of faith and/or cowardice.