On the heels of this week’s statement issued by the Council of Cardinals (C9) pledging its support for Francis, comes the following:
In relation to recent events, aka Catholic expresses its full support for the work of salvation as given to the Holy Catholic Church by Christ, assuring at the same time its full adhesion to immutable doctrine and backing for all who likewise honor the authentic Magisterium of the Church, while steadfastly opposing those who do not.
In other news…
Certain segments of Catholic social media are abuzz with outrage over news that a Masonic ceremony is scheduled to take place at Canterbury Cathedral tomorrow, February 18 – the same day that Cardinal Vincent Nichols plans to re-consecrate England and Wales to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Westminster Cathedral.
Sorry, but I’m having trouble getting worked up over this.
Sure, Canterbury Cathedral has a rich Catholic history and is the burial place of a number of Saints, but it’s also a venue wherein the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Priesthood of Jesus Christ have been openly mocked for centuries on end.
With this in mind, tell me again why I’m supposed to be alarmed over a bunch of idiots in aprons carrying out a ritual inside of what amounts to Heretic Headquarters for the Church of England?
I’m far more concerned about the Masonic invasion of Rome, its humanist bishop-in-white, and the fact that Cardinal Nichols can’t praise him and his Love Letter to Lucifer, Amoris Laetitia, enough.
The canonization cause of Lucia of Fatima
National Catholic Register is reporting that the diocesan phase of the canonization process for Sr. Lucia, after some seven years of full-time work, was officially concluded on Feb. 13.
Vice-postulator for the cause, Sr. Angela Coelho, said of the process :
Each page that Sister Lucia wrote had to be meticulously analyzed and we are talking of a universe of 10,000 letters that we managed to gather and of a diary with 2,000 pages, in addition to other more personal texts.
Now that the diocesan phase is complete, all of the relevant documents are being submitted to the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints in Rome.
Uh… not so fast.
“Canonization” such as it is following the New Pentecost is often little more than a propaganda tool shamelessly leveraged with impunity by the Captains of New Church in order to give the appearance of Catholicity to whatever might further their own cause.
With the “canonizations” of John XXIII and John Paul the Great Ecumenist, the intention was to anoint the Council. With the beatification and almost-certain-to-be canonization of Paul VI, the intent will be to do the same for the Novus Ordo.
There can be no doubt whatsoever that the motive for moving forward with the cause of Sr. Lucia is also evil; in this case, to give the appearance of authenticity to the fake letters and bogus interviews of the Fatima seer; all in a futile attempt to silence doubts about Our Lady’s alleged satisfaction with the consecration of Russia that never happened, and to put to rest for good continued speculation about the actual contents of the Third Secret.
For more on the Fatima cover-up campaign, see HERE.
Jews for Islamic immigrants?
Here in the U.S., leftists are in a perpetual state of outrage over all things Trump; including his Executive Order, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.
According to the Order, the U.S. will temporarily ban immigrants from a number of predominantly Muslim nations, while suspending indefinitely the acceptance of refugees from Syria, at least until such time as a reliable screening process can be put in place.
The reason is obvious enough to thinking persons, but for the benefit of the lobotomized left, the Order spells it out as follows:
It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and to prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.
And yet, among those who are wailing in protest against the Order the loudest are those whom the Islamic terrorists would most like to attack, self-identified Jews; so much so that even the Jerusalem Post took notice (see HERE.)
At first blush it seems rather odd, but on further reflection it occurs to me that it kind of makes sense for liberal Jews to fawn over the “peaceful Muslim” deception.
Because they’re cut from the same cloth.
You see, liberal Jews (meaning, those who call themselves Jewish in spite of making no effort whatsoever to live out the demands of the Old Testament), and the “peaceful Muslim” (meaning those who call themselves Muslim in spite of making no effort whatsoever to live out the demands of the Qur’an) are practically cousins; the DNA that they share, apostasy.
A different kind of pledge
Lately, a strange headline keeps popping up on my Facebook feed, “College Students Pledge to Remove Genitals if Trump Builds Wall.”
I never bothered clicking on the link since it’s obviously a shining example of “fake news.”
I mean, seriously… every liberal male I’ve ever known self-castrated a long time ago.
Anti-Trump demonstrators would sooner remove their genitals as much as they’d move to Canada. And I’m calling their bluff because this sort are the kind that like playing with their genitals.
I suppose the Sr. Lucia canonization will be for the 100th year celebrations that include a cartoon movie that mocks the seriousness of the Fatima Apparitions and apparently also stars Francis.
I watched a utube today with a man named Robert David Steele, a former Central Intelligence Agency clandestine services case officer. The information given by this man was horrifying. The Vatican is entangled in all of this , Opus Dei was mentioned by this gentleman. We know that Jorge was in collusion with the democratic (Communist) party and no doubt men in the Vatican are being blackmailed along with our congressmen and senators by those who control things behind the scenes.Prayers for the Trump administration cannot be stressed enough. The diabolical subversion of all that Our Lady has attempted to do to assist mankind is par for the course….we are headed for something unspeakable, only Our Immaculate Mother can help us.Prayers Prayers and more Prayers.
Which Sr Lucia are they canonizing? The real one or the NO one?
The hard core Muslim and Dead Sea Pedestrians also share the same attributes as their liberal cohorts: they both have a fanatical obsession with a hate book, are infidels and seek to destroy Christ and His Church. Strange that the Jews support full immigration from these countries while at the same time support bombing said countries into the stone age.
No the Muslims don’t seek to attack Israel. If that were the case then ISIS (Israeli Secret Intelligence Service) would be crossing Syria and Iraq to kick the infidels (sic) out of their holy land. But not a peep. Funny that? Even wounded Daesh soldiers have been treated in Israeli hospitals. The Saudi devils are in league with their co-infidel neighbours to support Israel’s Yinon plan. How much have they been paid off to take the rap for 9/11?
Sr Lucia got a face transplant in 1960, and was also given a magic elixr of youth to live another 40 years without ageing much. It’s simple, Tom.
Louie, I hope you don’t believe that the Sister Lucy from Paul VI onward was the real Sister Lucy. I’m not a conspiracy nut, but it is obvious from reading the research on facial comparisons done with pictures before 1960 of Sister Lucy to those done after that they are not the same person. Any reasonable person who does due diligence will be forced to come to that conclusion. Only God knows what became of the real Sister Lucy.
While this is only in the broder context of being relvant to the article, being about Francis and all, readers might be interested in this story about a gigantic statue of Francis coming to Mexico. It happens to be standing on a cubed base with measures 6′ X 6′ x 6′ – which is a mere aside to the story.
Yeah, silly me. I should defer to those with credentials.
There is much to support the facial comparisons of the two Lucys which suggest a doppelganger was enlisted. I don’t agree with what some seem to suggest that the real sister Lucy was killed quite early on. There appears good evidence (from the Abbe de Nantes site) that in 1977 sister Lucy sought a meeting with Archbishop Albino Luciano in her convent where she told him that he was to become pope and that it would be a short reign. He was a changed man after that meeting.
“Each page that Sister Lucia wrote had to be meticulously analyzed and we are talking of a universe of 10,000 letters that we managed to gather and of a diary with 2,000 pages, in addition to other more personal texts.”
Wouldn’t that include the full text of the Third Secret?
1. There are no conspiracies.
2. That everything is a conspiracy.
I think though, that it is more likely that the Sr Lucy after 1960 is not the same person as the Sr Lucy before 1960.
A study of the handwriting comparison of “both” Sr Lucys writings ought to disclose more evidence as to which one. is the authentic. If the original seer has been supplanted by a substitute, what a terrible burden on the soul of the unfortunate one.
It would be interesting to see what the mass of latter writings draw our attention to, compared to the Third and final secret. Perhaps more revelations of a New Church, New Sacraments, relatively speaking. It would have to rival the daily dispatches coming from the false seers at Medjorie to keep the New theme alive, one would imagine.
The nun publicly claiming to be Sr. Lucia post 1960 is Novus Ordo.
Pre 1960 Sr. Lucia (from CRC):
“ God wants my voice to be heard throughout the world, like an echo of His, setting out what the Message of Fatima was and still is as regards God and souls, in time and eternity, in order that minds may be enlightened as to the path of Christian life that they must follow and as regards the errors that they must shun so as not to let themselves be deceived by false doctrines. ”
I don’t know if this proves anything or not, but what made me feel strongly about a “fake” Sr. Lucia was a video showing her kissing the hand of JPII as he was giving her Holy Communion. I don’t think the “real” Sr. Lucia would do that. Made no sense to me.
The SSPX has a new article on SSPX.org, titled, “Is this the proper way to combat the crisis in the Church?”
The SSPX article denounces using satire as a form of criticism against the Pope. It says, regarding those fake satirical emails about Cardinal Schonborn, and those anonymous posters put up around Rome recently, “Further, as we have touched on before, we cannot support this passive-aggressive and disrespectful method of “correcting” the Pope.”
What the SSPX perhaps doesn’t remember is that Archbishop Lefebvre also used satire to “correct” the Pope. Perhaps the SSPX wants to distance themselves from those posters up in Rome, since it was assumed by some that the SSPX put them up. But no, the SSPX would never be that brave; not anymore anyway.
Which one? The two-pager Malachi Martin saw or the multiple page propaganda piece released by the Vatican.
Look for the real meaning and purpose. In “criticizing” both incidents, it repeats the content and purpose again in detail. Interestingly, the entire statement appears to say, SiSi, NoNo. I thought it was extremely clever.
I’m not sure I understand your meaning. Are you saying that the SSPX publication is really in fact criticizing the Pope, but making it seem like it’s defending him instead? If so, then I don’t agree.
Jean Guitton’s account of Pope Paul’s visit to Fatima in 1967. It was the first appearance of the N.O. Sr. Lucy (CRC):
“I venture to ask him (Pope Paul VI) for his impressions of his pilgrimage to Fatima. ‘It is quite different from the other three visits I made, completely of a different order. I could only sum up my impressions using a single expression: I saw humanity. Yes, real humanity, humanity in a state of simplicity, prayer and penance. It was the vision of the final gathering, perhaps the greatest gathering of true believers. I had never seen that in this world. Certainly, at Bombay, there was also a million people, but they were curiosity seekers, and then they were strung out over twenty kilometres. Here, the gathering occupied a single basin, giving the impression that humanity was truly one.’ – ‘And Lucy’, I said to him, ‘what impression did she make on you?’ – ‘Oh, she is a very simple girl! An uncomplicated peasant woman. The people wanted to see her and I showed her to them.’
St. Jerome Letter 55 to Amandus
(St. Jerome answers questions one being : ‘Can a woman who has divorced her first husband on account of his vices and who has during his lifetime under compulsion married again, communicate with the Church without first doing penance?’ )
4. I have not been able quite to determine what it is that she means by the words has found herself compelled to marry again. What is this compulsion of which she speaks? Was she overborne by a crowd and ravished against her will? If so, why has she not, thus victimized, subsequently put away her ravisher? Let her read the books of Moses and she will find that if violence is offered to a betrothed virgin in a city and she does not cry out, she is punished as an adulteress: but if she is forced in the field, she is innocent of sin and her ravisher alone is amenable to the laws. Deuteronomy 22:23-27 Therefore if your sister, who, as she says, has been forced into a second union, wishes to receive the body of Christ and not to be accounted an adulteress, let her do penance; so far at least as from the time she begins to repent to have no farther intercourse with that second husband who ought to be called not a husband but an adulterer. If this seems hard to her and if she cannot leave one whom she has once loved and will not prefer the Lord to sensual pleasure, let her hear the declaration of the apostle: ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table and of the table of devils, 1 Corinthians 10:21 and in another place: what communion has light with darkness? And what concord has Christ with Belial? 2 Corinthians 6:14-15 … …Wherefore, I beseech you, do your best to comfort her and to urge her to seek salvation. Diseased flesh calls for the knife and the searing-iron. The wound is to blame and not the healing art, if with a cruelty that is really kindness a physician to spare does not spare, and to be merciful is cruel.
Yeah, I notice we don’t hear anything from them do we? All this going on and they have nothing to say? I’m at the point where if you don’t man up, you’re just a part of the problem. Go away. You’re not helping anybody.
I can’t imagine there was a real Lucy and a fake Lucy. To me she looked like an older various of herself when she was elderly. It is impossible to believe people would not have pointed this out loud and clear even back in the day. She had family visiting her periodically. It is beyond reasonable to imagine they would all have been silenced.
One thing I really never bought into was Sister Lucia saying that the “final battle” between Satan and Our Lord was over marriage. Imo, the “final battle” started long ago at VII and was where Satan began trying to destroy the 1st Commandment (not the 6th) and was able to officially declare victory on July 1, 1988 , the day of infamy, or the day PJPII “excommunicated” Arch. LeFebvre. The “final battle” was been pretty much over long ago and the mantra about marriage is just a smokescreen by neocats to fool people into thinking everything was fine and dandy in the Church until Pope Francis and AL came along and from looking at comments from many websites it obviously has worked. I feel same about St. Gallen mafia, it was thrown out there by a liberal cardinal to make people think it was just a small fraction of “evil” bishops and Cardinals undermining our great orthodox Popes (this is the stupid myth neocats on ewtn, etc. have been using for years now) messing up the Church when in reality it’s been the WHOLE hiearchy in the Church , including Popes, the last 50 years minus one and the only one with the guts who got “excommunicated” : Arch. Lefebvre. Two “Fake News” stories that are widely accepted as fact now that confirms what neocats always argued and now widely accepted by many “trads.”
“Paul VI had insisted that Sister Lucy be present at Fatima for his visit on 13 May. “I know from a reliable source”, wrote Canon Barthas, “I have known it for several days now and Lucy’s Mother Prioress confirmed it to me on the day itself, that Lucy had doggedly refused to obey the order that the Bishop of Coimbra had sent her to leave her cloister on the 13th and to go to Fatima. Finally, she telephoned the Lisbon nuncio herself and he confirmed that she would be practising grave disobedience to the Holy Father if she did not go.12” Barthas stated: “If this had only been a desire of the Holy Father and not an order, she would have preferred to remain in the monastery. The nuncio explained to her that it was Paul VI’s formal wish.13”
However, astonishingly, the Pope had made no plans to grant her an audience14.”
Do you have a link to that video?
I said back when the whole pizzagate thing came out that if true its gonna reach the Vatican.
Folks, its gonna get a lot worse before it gets better. But its gotta happen. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary is gonna come on the other side if a whole lot of pain.
Keep the Faith…no matter what.
According to one source, for more than 40 years, she was unable to be seen even by her sister except through a grille and with other nuns present. This would explain why her sister would not have been able to uncover the fraud as she was never able to see Lucy except behind a grille and fully clothed in a habit, and never able to speak intimately with her because of the constant presence of other nuns.
Look at the different pictures of the faces of Lucy, and a picture of the grill I mentioned above, on this website and see if you think they are the same person:
I found a video made by an adherent of the SSPX, which breaks down and analyzes the SSPX article in question, in which the SSPX criticizes the anonymous and supposedly satirical nature of the comments against the Pope. It is a reasonable commentary, and doesn’t show disrespect for Bishop Felly, though I watched all but about five minutes of it.
According to Canon Barthas Sr.
Lucy was refusing to go to Fatima. The real Sr. Lucia would never be so disobedient unless it was something against the Faith. Was this the other nun being pressured against her will to play the part?
Why I still attend the Novus Ordo Mass..
“Nor ought the absence of sweetness and consolation deter us from communicating; “how unwise would be the man,” says St. Ignatius, “who refused to eat his bread, and chose to die of hunger, because it was not spread with honey.”
Dear Ever Mindful, sister in Christ, Does not “the absence of sweetness and consolation” not refer only to the subjective experience of the communicant? Could it possibly also include objective errors and sinful errors in the form of the Holy Mass, itself? God bless.
Very well said and a very good point Lynda.
Yeah but it’s non-demonic in the metric system. Come on.