On November 15, Jorge Pachapapa Bergoglio revealed plans to revise, yet again, the Catechism of the Conciliar Church (otherwise known by the deceptive title Catechism of the Catholic [sic] Church).
In a lengthy address to the International Association of Penal Law, “Francis” (as he is widely known) said:
An elementary sense of justice would require that certain conduct, for which corporations are usually responsible, does not go unpunished. In particular, all those that can be considered as “ecocide”: the massive contamination of air, land and water resources, the large-scale destruction of flora and fauna, and any action capable of producing an ecological disaster or destroying an ecosystem. We must introduce – we are thinking about it – in the Catechism of the Catholic Church the sin against ecology, the ecological sin against the common home, because it is a duty.
An elementary sense of justice… sin against ecology… because it is a duty.
The choice of words in this case is very telling. You see, justice, in its most elementary sense, is to render unto God what He is due, as is every man’s duty. Failure to do so is a sin against God. In Jorge’s version, as one can plainly see, God has been unceremoniously replaced by ecology; i.e., Mother Earth. No shocker here, coming as this does on the heels of PaganCon, aka the Amazonian Synod.
The stage for the proposed eco-revision of the so-called “Catechism” was set in 2015 with the publication of the Envirocyclical, Laudato Si’, wherein the concept of “our sins against creation” (LS 8) was introduced.
“What is new is the vaguely pantheistic and certainly rather confused language in which current church authority is incompetently attempting to speak of these matters,” theologian Dr. Peter Kwasniewski told LifeSiteNews.
While the language being used may be vaguely pantheistic, the program itself is plainly humanistic, and its roots extend all the way back to… wait for it… wait for it… the Almighty Council! Indeed, what we are witnessing is not so much the divinization of nature, but rather the divinization of man as expressed, in part, by the conciliar treatment of man’s relationship with creation.
According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown (Gaudium et Spes 12).
I think it’s safe to say that St. Paul would disagree:
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with spiritual blessings in heavenly places, in Christ … That he might make known unto us the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure, which He hath purposed in Him, in the dispensation of the fulness of times, to re-establish all things that are in heaven and on earth in Christ (cf Ephesians 1:3, 9-10).
In this, the contrast between the Catholic faith and the conciliar faith couldn’t be starker.
The re-establishment of all things on earth was occasioned by original sin, the felix culpa of Adam and Even – the happy fault which gained for us so good and great a Redeemer.
The Fall may well be understood as that act whereby our first parents attempted to treat all things on earth as if they really should be related to man as their center and crown, and this in spite of God’s clear command to the contrary.
One might even say that this is the nature of all sin; a futile attempt to elevate man, either collectively or individually, to the autonomous status of “center and crown.” In truth, it is in the person of Jesus Christ alone, the Redeemer to whom all authority in heaven and on earth has been given (cf Mat 28:18), that all things are properly related, can be restored, and attain to their ultimate purpose.
With this in mind, it is no exaggeration to say that the Council’s treatment of man vis-à-vis his relationship with the things of the earth (as proposed in GS 12) is the inversion and the attempted undoing of God’s will; it is a veritable attempt to thwart His good pleasure.
One also rightly observes that the Council’s humanism is well understood as a form of messianism; i.e., by attempting to usurp the place of Christ Jesus as the center and crown to which all things should be related, it is an attempt to make of man his own Messiah.
In this, the conciliar church shares substantial common ground with the majority of self-identified Jews in our time (in Latin, nostra aetate, also the name of the conciliar text that falsely describes the Catholic Church’s relationship with Judaism).
Reform Judaism teaches that, in partnership with God, it is up to us to make the world into a place of peace and justice, and that we cannot wait nor do we expect a personal Messiah. – Rabbi Joseph Meszler
As I observed in this space back in 2015:
No one cause, arguably, has taken on quasi-religious status among Reform Jews to an extent equal to that of radical environmentalism – a movement-within-the-movement that twists the Psalmists words, addressed to God, “Thou shalt send forth thy spirit, and they shall be created: and thou shalt renew the face of the earth,” into a manifesto for purely human endeavors that tend toward earth worship …
[Francis] is revealing himself all the more clearly to be exactly that, and his pontificate as precisely what one might expect should a man with the mind of a liberal Jew somehow ascended to the Chair of St. Peter. (For more, see If the Pope was a Liberal Jew, Aug. 12, 2015)
In the years since the above was written, it has become all the more clear that Jorge Bergoglio’s religion is most certainly not Catholicism; in fact, it appears far closer to Reform Judaism than anything else – with the promotion of so-called economic justice, gun control, immigration reform, and radical environmentalism being among its main objectives.
In his address of November 15, Francis cited the Amazonian Synod’s definition of ecological sin as an “action or omission against God, against one’s neighbor, the community and the environment … a sin against future generations.”
It would be naïve to assume that, when Jorge Bergoglio speaks of “God,” he is speaking of the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ as did St. Paul; no more than the rabbi cited above understands “God” to be the Father of Jesus Christ.
It has become entirely evident over these last six, dreadful, years that his is not the “Catholic God” but rather is it a generic, false god – the “God of Surprises” that wills the diversity of religion in the same way that male and female are willed by the Creator – a deity that is somehow glorified by Pachamama idols, bowls of dirt, and pagan rituals.
Ultimately, however, there can be no doubt that the Bergoglian god is none other than the Council’s god, mankind, the center and crown to which it proposed all things on earth should be related. And let us not forget that Jorge Bergoglio is the same who, dressed in papal garb, stood before a gathering at the Vatican, drew upon the falsehood set forth in Gaudium et Spes 12, and boldly declared that “man is King of the Universe!”
Make no mistake; it is his unshakable fidelity to the false, humanistic, god of Vatican II – which bears a striking resemblance to the “messianic man” of most self-identified Jews in our time – that moves Francis to decry “ecocide” and “sins against ecology.”
Thank you, Louie. It is no surprise that Bergoglio is establishing a worldwide religion which worships creation without thought of the Almighty Creator. While he’s at it, maybe he could seek a sense of justice for all (especially children) who were sexually abused by so-called “catholic clergy”. In his twisted mind, he will probably blame the victims. “Pachapapa” believes himself to be “Father of the Universe” because he says so and he is the all-powerful Pope…..or thinks he is.
“Witchcraft in ancient history was known as “The Craft of the Wise” because most who followed the path were in tune with the forces of nature, had a knowledge of Herbs and medicines, gave council and were valuable parts of the village and community as Shamanic healers and leaders. They understood that mankind is not superior to nature, the earth and its creatures but instead we are simply one of the many parts, both seen and unseen that combine to make the whole. As Chief Seattle said; “We do not own the earth, we are part of it.” These wise people understood that what we take or use, we must return in kind to maintain balance and equilibrium. Clearly, modern man with all his applied learning and technology has forgotten this. Subsequently, we currently face ecological disaster and eventual extinction because of our hunger for power and a few pieces of gold.”
https://wicca.com/celtic/wicca/wicca.htm
Dear Mr. Verrecchio, I’d really love to see you look into how we get a Pope for the Catholic Church. This is super that a couple men are standing up and warning Catholics that Jorge is not Catholic and neither is the New Order but literally no person is in any way even discussing how the Catholic Church ever gets a Pope again; except a couple who think that we can just step back to 2012 bc they liked the plain old creepy gay New Order better than the alarming heading towards human sacrifice demon worshiping New Order, as if New Order is in any way Catholic, which is completely nuts. I don’t mean to be selfish but everyone should know by now that Jorge isn’t the Pope and if they don’t they got problems that might not be fixable but maybe the Church can have a Pope; we’ve done this before. We’ve gotten a Pope against all the wiles of the enemies of the Church, we should do that again.
He’s already predicted when we’ll get a non-NO Pope and it’s going to be painful for many: https://akacatholic.com/fatima-russia-the-100-year-countdown/
The 3rd Secret was to be announced by 1960 to thwart the creation of the false Church in the first place, and thus to delay the coming of the Antichrist who would abolish the Mass. Unfortunately that didn’t happen and chaos ensued.
Akita was approved by the false church and as such I reject it. It serves (Satan) to perpetuate the confusion and the idea that the false church is still the church, which has been proven recently in this comment section to not be the case. The Vatican II church has anathematized ITSELF.
I read it. I don’t need a heretic—Ratzinger—to alert me to the (obvious) coming cataclysm, a cataclysm which he, as a peritus at Vatican II, is in no small measure responsible for. He was an important member of the cabal that cut Christ’s Holy Church off at the knees. His contribution to the evisceration of the Catholic Church is quite significant. He has never asked for forgiveness, never said he did anything wrong, and apparently is not the least bit remorseful for the damage that he has done. I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes when he (along with his VII cohorts) stands before God in judgement. Just look at this mess we’re in!
My comment is in response to LennyB.
VERITAS DOMINI MANET IN AETERNUM
The Council of Trent said: “It is certain that the Church was instructed by Jesus Christ and His apostles and that all truth was daily taught Her by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. Therefore, it is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain ‘restoration and regeneration’ for her as though necessary for her safety and growth, as if she could be considered subject to defect or obscuration or other misfortune. Indeed these authors of novelties consider that a foundation may be laid of a new human institution, and what St. Cyprian detested may come to pass, that what was a divine thing may become a human church.”
Dear Melanie,
That creature beast thing from Hell is not the Catholic Church and you know it. Thus, how can a church which is not Catholic, consecrate Catholic Bishops, which would then give Melanie a Catholic Pope? To suggest that Melanie, is utterly absurd. God bless you. In caritas.
Dear In caritas, Since you are wrong about the Antichrist having come and died already decades ago, I am hopeful that you’re also wrong about there being no Bishops left on Earth. I hope that Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, Bishop Fellay, Bishop Williamson, Bishop Pivarunas, Bishop Dolan, Bishop Davila and Bishop Sanborn are validly consecrated Catholic Bishops. And yes, I would imagine that if we can get a Pope for the Church these would be the men who could elect him. New Order bishops couldn’t elect the Catholic Pope any more than the Mormon bishops could.
Bergoglio’s mindset is that of a talmudic jew.Very much in keeping with the conciliar church,which is just another arm of the synagogue.
Dear Melanie,
Each of those men assent to the false popes of the false church of Antichrist, as though it is the Church which The Christ established, on the Rock as Blessed Peter. Amen. This is the objective reality, as each their own free will assent to false popes as though they could be the true Vicars of Christ, is public knowledge, as res ipsa loquitur. Remember dear Melanie, wherever as everywhere contradiction exists, Catholic Truth cannot also be found there. As they assent to false popes, they cannot be true Bishops, as that is a perfect contradiction. I myself cannot at once be true, when my assent is false. Amen. Alleluia.
As it relates to the very persons of the False Prophet and the Antichrist, no one can see unless the blindness is removed. The prophecy has been fulfilled, as the divine Mystery has been revealed. Amen. As the Angelic Doctor taught and the Holy Magisterium has received, “Truth”, is the human intellect PERFECTLY CONFORMING
to the, “reality as it is”, and not to reality as Melanie or In caritas may think it is. You may be deceived into thinking as believing, that a dime is worth more than a quarter. You deception Melanie cannot change the substantial reality as it is, truth thus, that the quarter is worth more than the dime, as the truth simply IS. I pray this helps and as always, I am humbled to entertain your queries. God bless you. In caritas.
Thank you for connecting eco-one world religion to its source in the “Concilliar” “Constitution”. Natural, organic steps. We must see and judge why and how this happened before we can properly respond.
The key to the Devil’s strategy with Vatican II was to produce much that was good, or seemed good, at least sounded good, surrounding these “Constitution” worm holes that directly connect the Church to the Pit Of Hell – resulting in the black fruit, Man-centric religion; the original sin. All is turned inward, starting at New Mass (I don’t grant them Latin credence any more) and extending on to our personal conscience.
It all has the patina of established Authority now, so it appears as if we must not question any of it. In other words, Satan has control via the worm holes.
Rooting out the mold that now infects Tradition is going to be a long arduous process, or it may only be possible through Divine intervention; beyond the scope of Man.
I just think it’s convenient, not for Catholics but for Satan, that the only voices I hear are saying that the Catholic Church can not elect a Pope. I’ll start w/you, a bit of an outlier, you say we can’t elect a Pope bc there are no Bishops or Priests and the Antichrist was John XXIII and he dead so the end just believe, SSPX says Jorge is Pope so I don’t know whether they’re lying or crazy and then sedevacantists say a Pope will be provided via some mystery and they don’t even care how or when even though we have ALWAYS elected a pope even if it was done in the most inept manner and we have never had one sent down from Heaven. So, I think that you are all lying good cops to the New Order bad cops and you are preventing the Church from electing a Pope. Well, you guys appear wildly successful but I know that no matter what time we are in we are supposed to have a Pope.
The only way out of this diabolical confusion is through the Purification of the Church ushered in by Our Lady of Buen Suceso. There is a reason why she is holding a crozier! No one in the heirarchy will act. Bergoglio’s fake church is the deception that will cause many to lose the faith because they will be looking at it as if it’s the Catholic Church, but it will progressively become less and less like it, the 4 marks not even remotely able to be attributed to it, with more and more Pervbishops being appointed, to the point where unless one has the understanding that the True Church is underground, will give up, thinking all is lost. Not unlike at the Crucifixion of Our Lord. Many will believe the Church is dead. All that will be left is the Rosary and the sign left by Our Lord. But, when all seems lost, that will be the time for the triumph of the Immaculate Heart!
Thank you for that.
Behold Michael Matt’s latest pitiful video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehpNXeCueL0&lc=z223gf3xalawhhw1tacdp43bm52lvessq3bdzcrcxm5w03c010c.1574331892854425
It really boggles the mind that he continues to call this cretin “Holy Father.” As a pertinacious heretic, Francis is neither holy nor fatherly. Of course Matt’s defense would consist of spouting nonsense about “respecting the office.” This demonic man must be UNEQUIVOCALLY opposed (whether he’s pope or not). To speak of this vile man as “Holy Father” is to speak double-talk. “But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.”
Also note the editor’s inclusion of music in that video. Music in film is of course always designed to manipulate the emotions of the viewer. Hence in any piece of non-fictional film, the inclusion of music always raises my skeptical antennae.
I commented on that pitiful display by Michael Matt, but alas, it wasn’t approved. The Remnant and the ridiculous “Unite the Clans” movement have been very instrumental in opening my eyes to the serious issues with the R&R position. You’re right, there is nothing holy nor fatherly about Bergoglio. He’s the Anti-John the Baptist. Not Catholic in any sense of the word, so how can he be pope?
If Michael Matt were a loyal Catholic, he would assent to the teachings if his Pope.
Insofar as they’re the teachings of the Holy Trinity. The teachings of a pope are not ipso facto the teachings of the Holy Trinity.
Yes Catherine, they’ve banned my comments under all my various accounts save one.
The Council of Trent said: “It is certain that the Church was instructed by Jesus Christ and His apostles and that all truth was daily taught Her by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. Therefore, it is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain ‘restoration and regeneration’ for her as though necessary for her safety and growth, as if she could be considered subject to defect or obscuration or other misfortune. Indeed these authors of novelties consider that a foundation may be laid of a new human institution, and what St. Cyprian detested may come to pass, that what was a divine thing may become a human church.”
“Better that only a few Catholics should be left, staunch and sincere in their religion, than that they should, remaining many, desire as it were, to be in collusion with the Church’s enemies and in conformity with the open foes of our faith.”
Michael Matt knows, in his heart, that this imposter known as Pope Francis, is not now or ever was an Ambassador for Christ and His Church. He cannot publicly make that announcement because his readership consists of “catholics” hanging on to an incredible hope that Francis and his cohorts will wake up one day and actually BE Catholic. This still does not explain referring to this man as “Holy Father”. That’s a real stretch! What a beautiful title for an ugly man. Wake up, Michael!
In caritas,
Pivarunas, Dolan, Davila, and Sanborn don’t acknowledge any of the V2 heads as true Popes at all; they’ve rejected them all as antipopes, and have publicly stated, to the best of my knowledge, that Pius XII was the last true Pope. They’re sedevacantists.
Tissier, Fellay, and Williamson, being of the SSPX, do assent to the V2 hierarchy (albeit as recognize & resisters).
Dear Melanie,
Nothing that I write is my opinion. The infallible as divine Magisterial teaching is sited as proof. If you are blind to Truth, you must beg God for His mercy and submit, as The Christ commanded: He who knows My commands and follows them, loves Me, and as I Am in the Father, you are in Me, and I in you. Amen. Alleluia. Jesus the Christ, the Anointed One of God, commands us as He teaches us, through His Magisterium. Amen. Alleluia. The Angelic Doctor taught and the Magisterium received that, “truth”, is the, “reality as it is”. The divine Magisterium is, “Reality Itself”, as it is divine Truth, as the divine Person of Jesus Christ, and as per, “Satis Cognitum”. If your intellect does not perfectly conform, through the reception of grace alone, to the, “Reality as it is”, of the divine Magisterium, then you will remain blind to Truth. That is the Church teaching, not my perfectly miserable opinion. Have you even read any of those 4 encyclicals yet to save your soul? You must zeal for Truth in perfect spite of yourself, Amen. He is the Groom of His Mystical Body and Bride, the inviolable Church. Dear Melanie, you must submit, and at the pain of Hell, that the prophetic time would come when Blessed Peter in his Successors, would be gone from the earth, not to return, with the loss of Apostolic Succession, deFide, as the Early Church Fathers in unanimity taught this, and the Magisterium commands our assent of faith, at the pain of Hell, to their unanimous teaching as being inerrant. Period and end. They inerrantly taught that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass would be gone from the face of the earth without distinction, thus without exception. Further, they taught that when the Holy Sacrifice was gone, the Antichrist would be here, as he would be the efficient cause of this, deFide. If a true Vicar of Christ is present in the world, that is an impossibility, as he, as the Supreme Pastor of Holy Church, would offer the Holy Sacrifice, and of course. When he is not here, not as during interregnum, but as in the loss of Apostolic Succession, it is done, the Holy Sacrifice is lost. No Pope, no Bishops, no Priests, no Holy Sacrifice. Period and end. The rest is all part of the grand masquerade of the power that Satan was to be allowed to proffer, in the time of Antichrist, at the end of the Great Apostasy, as the very end of time. Amen. The poor, poor fools who believe that they are receiving valid Sacraments in this time are receiving the, “operation of error to believe lying”, that the Apostle Paul prophesied would affect all but all in the world during the time of Antichrist, and his desolation which would remain, as the prophet Daniel foretold and the Church Fathers affirmed in unanimity thus deFide, until the very consummation of the world, Amen. This is Church teaching as above demonstrated by the Magisterium.
We know with apodictic certitude that Apostolic Succession is lost and this occurred on October 27, 1958, 1 day before the false pope Roncalli initiated the false church of Antichrist. By the way, I never wrote that Roncalli was Antichrist, you did. We know this by submitting to the Election Law of Pope Pius XII, “Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis”, whereby he Authoritatively taught and again WITHOUT DISTINCTION THEREFORE WITHOUT EXCEPTION, that the College of Cardinals, however many were present in Rome by the 18th day after the death of the Vicar of Christ, as the very MAXIMUM number of days without exception, that the Cardinals had to begin their meeting for the purpose of the election of the next Vicar of Christ. That time has now passed 61 years ago. Once passed, no Pope can be elected, as he said any meeting after that deadline of 18 days, would be, “NULL AND VOID”. There you have it Melanie, it is IMPOSSIBLE, by the governing power as Authority of Blessed Peter in his Successor Pius XII, to ever elect a Pope again. If you deny this, you deny the Catholic Faith entoto, as definitively taught by the Vatican Council and, “Ad Apostolorum Principis”. This is the Church teaching Melanie and not my miserably imperfect opinion, as truth simply is, the reality as it is. Amen. God bless you. In caritas.
Dear A Simple Man,
Please read the last response to Melanie. It doesn’t matter whether they deny in fact. Their denial then, acknowledges the reality as it is, that there is NO JURISDICTION now in the cosmos, thus, no, “supplied Jurisdiction”, to be had, as it is an utter absurdity to suggest that, YOU CAN SUPPLY THAT WHICH YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY. Amen. Denying this reality then, is a patent denial of the Holy Catholic Faith, as per the Vatican Council and edified in, “Satis Cognitum”. Amen. God bless you, A Simple Man. In caritas.
A Simple Man,
Also, as if it mattered, their consecrators would have assented and thus in that act as ipso facto, would have lost the Catholic Faith, thus the consecrations were invalid, as they were heretics then, and as per, “Cum Ex…”, the consecrators were in fact never Bishops, but wolves dressed in Sheep’s clothing. Amen. In caritas.
In Caritas,
I’ve said before that this really is the only thing left in the world that makes any sense. No mental gymnastics involved. I find it thrilling that we are alive at this time.
Oh’ 2 cents,
You now claim to know the, “heart”, of the other. Blasphemy, yes? You actually write such fanciful lies. You actually as literally believe that you now speak for the, “heart”, of Michael Matt, when the Catholic Church teaches, ONLY GOD KNOWS THE HEART. You foolish man. I pray this admonishment somehow touches your intellect and will, as The Christ commanded: “You will know them by their fruits”. Amen. In caritas.
Dearest georgianne,
The joy that is witnessed and the true consolation received, through your witness of receiving the Truth, is utterly humbling as it is edifying. God bless and keep you and yours’. In caritas.
Too much politicisation, professionalisation, secularisation, desacralisation of the Holy Faith (which is for the Glory of God and the good of our eternal souls) by those with public platforms. Too much self-pride and self-glorification, not enough humility and self-sacrificing penance and atonement. Not enough fear of God Almighty. Not enough faith, hope or charity! Lord, have mercy! God forgive us, help us to become ever more pure and obedient to Thy Holy Perfect Will. St John Eudes’s explanation of the lack of good, holy priests is true, but still we cry out to God, send us holy priests though we do not deserve them! St John Vianney, Sts Peter and Paul, St John Fisher intercede for us poor orphans! Viva Cristo Rey!
Pius devil go away!
Well said. I cringe to think of those in Trad, Inc. who are making money off of the crisis.
“…the inclusion of music always raises my skeptical antennae.”
Mine too. But, hey—Matt’s got a nice living with that Remnant thing.
Yes, the zeal for truth from georgianne’s words are truly refreshing to read.
Very rare in persecution, indeed.
Oh’ and Catherine Sarto yet again,
Dear Catherine, it is amazing how the Truth cuts as a sword, yes, dividing then the wheat from the chaff, as the truth springs forth and is plainly seen. Amen. You place very contradiction in your ad hominem, and of course, as you have utterly no substantial argument, to bolster your purely passionate response. You freely choose to suppress and subordinate your intellective power, infinitely above that of the, “lower soul”, where the passions are to be, “found”. Almighty God created us in His likeness and image, that of the Divine, and commands thus and as immanently understood, to rise above our passions, control them and suppress them if needed, such that they are ordered subordinate then the intellect, which holds as its proper position, ordinate the passions, and infinitely so. Amen. Alleluia. I do pray that you may humble yourself and submit one day before you draw your last breath, unto the One, True, Holy, Roman Catholic, and Apostolic Faith. Amen. In caritas.
Yes for sure, Michael Matt is a “pius devil”, and misleading many poor souls.
A very apt comment after that video.
Well, the term “pius devil” was meant for In Caritas, but I suppose it’s applicable to Mr. Matt as well. I need to give credit to Alphonsus Jr. for coming up with that clever term which is so fitting for these types.
In other words, they are worldlings.
Sadly, Catherine, the mad In caritas isn’t the only pious devil I’ve encountered. This is surely true for many others as well.
Al, if a Pope teaches on faith or morals, it is protected by the Holy Ghost. If he tries to teach on climate it is not protected. But if he is a true Pope and he teaches that it is immoral to deny climate change, well then you have a decision. Assent or reject him as a Pope. Or if a Pope says the death penalty is immoral, assent or reject him as Pope. It i not the place for the faithful to correct or ignore the Pope when he teaches on faith or morals.