Skip to content
Louie Verrecchio

Tradition unadulterated.

  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Contact

Tradition unadulterated.

Search

Previous Posts

Why did Francis really meet with Benedict?

Louie, March 28, 2018March 28, 2018

Francis and BenedictAccording to a Communique issued by the Holy See Press Office, Francis met with the Pope Contemplatus at his Mater Ecclesiae Monastery residence yesterday to “offer him best wishes for Easter.”

First, I must admit that it is an annoyance to me when “best wishes for Easter” are offered by anyone prior to Easter; in particular during Holy Week.  It is all the more annoying when the person doing so is wearing a papal costume.

There is a palpable heaviness that accompanies Holy Week; at least for the believer.

Perhaps that explains why Francis saw no reason to delay his “Happy Easter” visit to Benedict. Then again, maybe the real reason for the visit had little to do with well wishes for Easter and much to do with a certain embarrassing scandal involving a letter.

My first thought when I saw the Vatican News headline, Pope Francis visits Pope Benedict, was that this was damage control in the form of just another manufactured photo-op designed to convince the naïve that all is simpatico in Rome.

And this in spite of the fact that the Holy See Press office is issuing reports about the meeting of two living popes!

Seriously, folks, think about that for a moment.

How utterly numb most of us have become to the sheer lunacy of the present situation!

There is absolutely nothing about the current situation that is even remotely compatible with Catholic thought. As I wrote shortly after Benedict pulled his “resignation” stunt – it simply doesn’t pass the Catholic smell test.

And yet, it is treated as a non-issue by most Catholic commentators; even those who posture as traditionalists.

I can well imagine future generations looking back on us collectively as perhaps the stupidest and most gullible fools who ever lived.

In any case, my initial thoughts on this meeting have changed.

Perhaps I am reading a bit too much into it, but for some reason I’ve been unable to find even one photo of yesterday’s allegedly cordial meeting of the men-in-white. The photo above – the same that accompanied today’s Vatican News story – is from April of last year.

Odd, isn’t it?

I mean, ever since Buona Sera Bergoglio was introduced to the world as Francis, the Holy See Press Office has been a PR machine on steroids; churning out more photo-op propaganda over the last five years than Pravda did during the entire Cold War.

What gives?

Could it be that Francis, who is reportedly given to fits of anger when anyone dares not fall in line, was in no mood to make pretend before the camera lenses yesterday given the seriousness of the discussion?

Of course, we will never know for certain what the “two popes” actually discussed, but I for one don’t think it unreasonable to imagine that the Argentinian may have taken the occasion to remind the Abdicator why he agreed to “resign” in the first place, and thus his duties under the new regime.

With this in mind, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to see a renewed effort on the part of the Bergoglians to leverage Benedict’s popularity among ill-informed conservatives to bolster the image of Dear Leader in the weeks ahead.

April 16 is Benedict’s birthday. At present, there is nothing on Francis’ public schedule. Sounds like the perfect opportunity to snap a few lighthearted images of the two grinning “popes” sharing cake and ice cream and perhaps even a mug of Bavarian beer.

We might even expect something more substantial than a photo-op; perhaps a Benedictine endorsement of Francis that goes beyond claims of “interior unity” (whatever that is).

We’ll see.

aka Modernist war

Blog Post BenedictFrancis

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Comments (8)

  1. Akita says:
    March 28, 2018 at 1:50 pm

    Yea, forget the Tridiuum, Bergoglio was there to get his “Kinderegg” sent from Germany by Father Georg Ratzinger.

  2. Evangeline says:
    March 28, 2018 at 6:29 pm

    He knows that putting anything in writing isn’t a good idea, now that the walls have ears. Better to deliver that in person. It would be no surprise at all to see some endorsement in the near future, but reading Benedict’s letter of late, he’s obviously still sharp and even feisty. He’s already given his endorsement anyway.

  3. rich says:
    March 28, 2018 at 7:44 pm

    Two living vatican 2 popes? Three? Four? Thirteen? As an actual Catholic this doesnt phase me in the least. Thats what the v2 church does….it sows confusion with the purpose of destroying Catholicism.

  4. my2cents says:
    March 28, 2018 at 9:43 pm

    The papacy is so irrelevant it really doesn’t matter how many, what they say or what they do. Now that Babies R Us and Toys R Us have closed shop, maybe the Vatican can adopt this logo as Saints R Us.

  5. Francesco says:
    March 29, 2018 at 7:08 am

    Normally this would be Mr. Gänswein‘s job. But he recently suffered a sudden hearing loss. So his humbleness Francis has to go personally to his boss incognito to bend his knees.

  6. LennyB says:
    March 29, 2018 at 10:05 am

    Louie, I know what the two Antipopes discussed: “Non esiste un inferno!”
    https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/03/there-is-no-hell-new-francis-revelation.html
    Nothing to see here folks, move along and proceed with your funding of the V2 Antichurch LGBTQ orgies.

  7. LennyB says:
    March 29, 2018 at 10:41 am

    Antichurch and its Antipopes ascended with V2 but they were first spawned within the Vatican by Cardinals Rampolla and Tedeschini more than a half century before V2. Tuy 1929 was meant for Pius XI. He had 10 more years to honor and obey Our Lady.

  8. Al The Silent Crusader says:
    March 29, 2018 at 12:45 pm

    Good ole Franco really met with Bennie to let him know…”One more, just ONE MORE slip up, and you’re gonna swim with da fishes!”

Comments are closed.

©2025 | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes