The Diocese of Phoenix has just launched a six-month long program to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the appearance of Our Lady at Fatima.
In the video below, Bishop Thomas Olmsted (who is held in high regard by neo-conservative Catholics) provides an overview of the effort that even some of my tradition-minded friends have applauded.
Pay close attention to what is being sold here and you will discover that it has all the hallmarks of the diabolical.
Now, don’t get me wrong; I’m not accusing Bishop Olmsted of being a covert agent of the Evil One, but I am here to say that Satan’s fingerprints, objectively speaking, are all over this tangled web of half-truths and outright lies.
The video begins with Bishop Olmsted recounting some of the more noteworthy events of the 20th century – the Second World War; the rise of Communism, the attack on marriage and family, and, of course, “an assassination attempt on the Holy Father John Paul II on May 13, 1981.”
Bishop Olmsted then asks rhetorically:
“Did you know that all of these events were prophesized by a woman 100 years ago? Who is she? Mary the Mother of God.”
The Devil is clever indeed, but he is also consistent; mixing truth with lies in order to deceive.
Yes, Our Blessed Lady did foretell of WWII and warn that the errors of Russia would spread (unless… and we’ll get to this in a moment), but nowhere did she speak of “an assassination attempt” on the pope.
According to the alleged text of the Third Secret as released by the Holy See in the year 2000, Sr. Lucia recounted the following vision:
“The Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him…”
As even a child can see; the vision above, wherein the pope is killed, bears little resemblance to the events of May 13, 1981.
Repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it.
We might also say:
Omit crucial information often enough and people will forget it.
On this note, Bishop Olmsted continued:
“[Mary] also gave them [the three Fatima] visionaries concrete ways to stop and even restore what would be lost … through the practices of penance and prayer.”
Certainly, the Blessed Virgin did call individuals to prayer, penance and acts of reparation, but she also spoke very clearly about Our Lord’s desire concerning the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart and the dire consequences we would face if this request was not met.
Sure, this video is but a two-and-a-half minute invitation to “join in the celebration,” but I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that Bishop Olmsted has no intention of calling anyone’s attention to this particular elephant in the room.
As for the invitation itself, Bishop Olmsted says:
“I’m inviting you to join me along with thousands of other Catholics and people of goodwill to explore and implement the teachings revealed by Our Lady of Fatima.”
Not only is the Devil consistent, so too is the Bishop Olmsted; at least insofar as his passion for modern-day ecumenism is concerned.
As such, it comes as no surprise that he wants to gather along with non-Catholics (so-called “people of goodwill”), many of whom presumably consider Marian devotion a form of idolatry, to “implement the teachings revealed by Our Lady of Fatima.”
Truth be told, if the “teachings” of Fatima could be summed up in a single phrase it would be the necessity of conversion.
Yes, this includes “conversion” in the sense of individual Catholics confessing their sins and amending their lives, but it also means the conversion to the one true Faith of both individuals and nations.
Again, I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that Bishop Olmsted has no intention of letting those “people of goodwill” know that their eternal lives will remain in grave jeopardy unless they renounce their errors and enter into the Holy Catholic Church which is necessary for salvation.
So, if not a call to conversion, what are the objectives of the diocese’s six-month celebration of Fatima?
Bishop Olmsted tells us:
Our objectives are simple; we will use this time for prayer, penance and evangelization in a particular way to encourage family prayer. Our specific intentions will be the following:
– The end to abortion and all violence against the most innocent and vulnerable
– An increase in vocations to priesthood and religious life, and
– The strengthening of the vocation of married life
Top of the list, of course, is the end of abortion!
This makes sense, because, you see, the human embryo is the false god of ecumenism. If Jesus Christ was the focus, the call to conversion to the one true Church, the one that He Himself established, would naturally take precedence; just as it does always and everywhere for Our Lady.
(And guess what? Conversion is the only answer to the scourge of abortion.)
Bishop Olmsted concludes by saying:
“Let us accompany Our Lady of Fatima in the way that she asked the three young children to do through prayer and penance praying the rosary every day for the conversion of hearts and peace in the world.”
At first blush, these are pleasant sounding words, and yet consider:
Our Lady requested prayers and sacrifices “for the conversion of sinners.” She spoke of how much Our Lord is offended by sin. She warned of the consequences of sin.
While there is nothing inherently offensive about seeking the “conversion of hearts,” given the source, I suspect that Our Lady’s request, for whatever reason, was deliberately reworded.
No matter, I suppose, given that Bishop Olmsted doesn’t appear to consider it a sin or an offense against God to reject the Holy Catholic faith.
And then there is the matter of peace, again…
Indeed Our Lady asked that we pray the Rosary daily for peace, but she made it entirely clear that we can expect the opposite unless and until the Holy Father, in union with the bishops of the world, consecrates Russia to her Immaculate Heart.
So, long story short, my friends, be vigilant. Don’t be lulled to sleep by half-truths and outright lies concerning the Fatima message. We can be certain that they will abound in this year, and we must expose them for what they are at every turn.
On this note, I will conclude by saying that while the canonizations of Jacinta and Francisco are a cause for joy, there can be no doubt that the enemies of Fatima, like Francis, would like nothing better than for this to lead the naïve to overlook Rome’s egregious, and continuous, falsification of Our Lady’s message.
Stay alert and remain watchful.
Though I dislike having to do so, I must ask yet again for your kind assistance in keeping this effort going. Thank you in advance.
Louie, how has it been helpful to categorize those claiming to be Catholic into what is really only political categories when the truth is that one is either Catholic or they are not?
This dividing of Catholics by Catholics into conservative, or neo-conservative lately or liberal or neo-liberal lately only serves to reinforce the lie of Protestantism that one can believe conflicting and opposite doctrines while still claiming to be faithful Christians.
He said he was going to consecrate his diocese to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Very noble but no mention of the request to consecrate Russia.
Thanks for asking, Katherine.
.
The reality is that there are individuals who are Catholic and yet hold certain erroneous opinions that lend themselves to being categorized under certain labels. (After all, we have to communicate with the language that we have.) .
.
On this note, I think most (if not all) readers understand what is meant by “neo-conservative.” Not that long ago, one would have been entirely justified in referring to me as a such, or perhaps a “conciliar” Catholic.
.
If your contention is that I wasn’t Catholic at all until such time as I came to realize (by God’s grace) that the hierarchy of the Church, including recent popes, have been deceiving us, I would have to disagree.
.
As for the Protestants, let’s be honest – the behavior of the hierarchy for the past 50+ years has given them all they need to feel comfortable rejecting the true faith; i.e., the problem isn’t the labels that we use to communicate among ourselves, it is the crisis in the Church.
.
If a Protestant is reading these pages, God bless them! I’m fairly certain they’re not coming away feeling very reinforced in their errors.
“I’m inviting you to join me and thousands of other Catholics and people of good will to explore and implement the teachings revealed by Our Lady of Fatima.”
People of good will. What does that mean? Sacred Scripture reveals who the men of good will are:
St. Luke 2:14: “Glory to God in the highest; and on earth, peace to men of good will.”
The Haydock commentary on this passage tells us that peace is offered to men of good will, or to those who by the grace of God are disposed to believe and obey the Gospel-doctrine.
Can peace really be expected to come through those who reject the one, true God or are not disposed to obeying-through their free will-the will of God? Does God act upon the prayers of those who reject Him, who work to destroy souls through the teachings and practices from Satan, or who mock and blasphemy Him to give them peace?
Louie, I appreciate your response and am thankful to God that your eyes have opened but I am confused by your statement that “there are individuals who are Catholic and yet hold certain erroneous opinions that lend themselves to being categorized under certain labels. (After all, we have to communicate with the language that we have.)”
It is my understanding that a Catholic cannot have varying “opinions” about the true teachings of the Church; that the rejection of even one of them makes one a heretic.
Could you specify those “opinions” which are erroneous placing them into the categories of politics and yet allow them to claim they are Catholic?
I would consider you to be a heretic when you chose to not only believe but propagate the heresies of Vatican II. The true Catholic religion was professed for more than 19 centuries, until Vatican II, and modern man has available to him more ways to access it than in any other time in history. Ignorance of it is almost near impossible.
Certainly all of us are prone to believe errors and it is through God’s grace that our eyes are opened; but anyone with a basic understanding of the true Catholic religion could not have at least questioned the changes that Vatican II brought into the heart of the Church, particularly the Novus Ordo liturgy, so foreign and different than the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
I really do not have a right to condemn anyone who has fallen for the lies and deceits of those who are called to be Christ’s shepherds but are wolves in sheep’s clothing and pray that they open their eyes to these lies and deceits, but it seems to me that there are too many who willingly are blind to the Truth because they simply do not want to believe it. Yet, I still pray for them daily. That everyone would come to know, believe, and practice the one, true, holy, Catholic, and apostolic faith.
WHAT IF Our Lady of Fatima has by-passed all of the supposed channels to get Her TRUE 3rd Secret out to the world by Her Own Orchestration?
.
WHAT IF the TRUE 3rd Secret has in it no mention of a “bishop dressed in white” after all?
.
WHAT IF this 3rd Secret of Our Lady’s has been revealed and even the devout Catholics (traditionalists/ aka Catholics) in the Catholic press have not responded with questions and comments?
.
….Stranger things have happened in this post conciliar world.
.
And it IS 2017, after all.
Finally, the Truth!
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g34hht_truth.htm
Archbishop Lefebvre:
“Thus we find ourselves in front of an ecclesiastical world fully incoherent, illogical, searching for compromises between truth and error, between good and evil, between light and darkness, God and Belial.
This shaking of faith truly seems to prepare for the coming of the Antichrist according to the predictions of St. Paul in his letter to the Thessalonians and the commentaries of the Fathers of the Church.
When Our Lord describes the end of times and after Him the Apostles in their letters, they speak to those who shall remain faithful saying: vigilate, vigilate – watch and be ready! “Thus Brothers, St. Paul says, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned.”(II Thess II 14)
“But the day of the Lord shall come as a thief, St. Peter says in his 2nd Epistle, in which the heavens shall pass with great violence… and the earth shall be burnt up (…) Wherefore, dearly beloved, waiting for these things, be diligent that you may be found before Him unspotted and blameless in peace.” (II Pet III 10-14).
May our prayers and fasts be for us a source of sanctification and a supplication for the return of the shepherds to the truth of the Traditional Magisterium of the Church, for the honor our Lord, for His universal reign and for the reign of Mary, His Holy Mother.”
Archbishop Lefebvre:
“Is it conceivable that no voice of authority is speaking out within the Church to condemn these public sins? Where are the Machabees of today? “
Thank you again for the foresight and wisdom of saint-in-waiting Archbishop Lefebvre. I live in Phoenix. Geographically, therefore, my bishop is Bishop Olmsted. In practice, however, my bishop is Bishop Fellay. Compare and contrast; you’ll immediately see the difference between real Catholicism and New Church, despite the fact Bishop Olmsted is about as good as it gets in that new sect.
Good points Louie, although I must say, this is not an easy call. I do not know of Bishop Olmsted, but I listened to what he was saying before I read your points, so as not to influence my opinion. I would have missed what you noticed, in particular, the call to end abortion, which of course I would love to see happen. But yes, where is the call to turn to Christ, since without Him, change of any kind is likely to be superficial. I notice in general our Catholic leadership has shied away from the name of Christ, they just don’t refer to him specifically, it is “the spirit”, which I really dislike. Why can they not even say “the Holy Spirit”? Bishop Olmsted did not do that in this video, and I must say I thought much of it was fine, even, a welcoming call. At least he is talking about Fatima and using vocabulary such as “penance”. I don’t know, I’m grateful for the 80% he got right I guess.
But your advice is good here Louie. I like to think I’m pretty savvy, but I admit, they can slip one past me now and then. I realize I have been effected by this post-conciliar church more than I wish to admit.
I’m with you, sister. I am reading a document by Leo XIII from 1886, I forget the name. It’s about believing everything the Catholic CHurch teaches, or, well, ya aint a Catholic.
I wanted to call “Catholic” Answeres to day and read a paragraph from the Leo XIII doc, and Nostra Aetate or whatever its called, and ask them how they square it.
There is no way on Darwins green earth, that these two documents were written by the same church, no way.
“..for the return of the shepherds to the truth of the Traditional Magisterium of the Church, for the honor of our Lord, for His universal reign and for the reign of Mary, His Holy Mother.”
Here admitting that the shepherds have fallen away from the truth and yet Archbishop Lefebrve and all those in the SSPX and other R&R groups will not admit that they cannot be Catholic by doing so and therefore, they are outside of the Church leaving them with absolutely no authority. Worse, that he and now Fellay want the fallen shepherd’s to incorporate the SSPX into their organization of lies and deceit. Why? This makes absolutely no sense. How can non-Catholics, particularly wolves in sheep’s clothing, honor Jesus Christ or Mary, Mother of God?
Is it conceivable that true authorities, faithful servants of God and of the Church would not speak out to condemn public sins? More to the point, is it conceivable that false authorities, unfaithful to God and the Church could do nothing other than be silent, or in the case of the last four years, defend and practice public sins?
According to the Modernist’s, there is both biological, Darwinian evolution and dogmatic evolution as man’s conscience evolves. Supposedly, the teachings of the Church in the past applied to the age in which they were promulgated but man has surpassed those ages in his understanding and experiences, or his conscience has evolved beyond the limitations of the past while newly developed theological and philosophical concepts have replaced those outdated concepts because they relate better to modern man.
John 16:8-11
8 And when he comes, he will prove the world wrong about sin and righteousness and judgment: 9 about sin, because they do not believe in me; 10 about righteousness, because I am going to the Father and you will see me no longer; 11 about judgment, because the ruler of this world has been condemned. ”
Apparently it looks as if the world will be convicted for the sin of unbelief in Jesus Christ.
I noticed that you’ve mentioned this several times, servant of Our Lady. It is all so new to me. But seems to make sense. Anything is possible. This is a very specific and direct message and seems to make sense. Maybe that is why no one here has mentioned it or commented on your comments. After all, we HAVE been conditioned. I would be interested in someone else’s opinion on this. Time will tell.
There is nothing more to say, but that in the end Her Immaculate Heart WILL triumph! RUSSIA WILL BE CONSERATED TO HER IMMACULATE HEART. Yahoo!! -I never get tired of hearing that! She did say “in the end” because She knew that it wasn’t going to happen right away. Right? She’ll take care of it in God’s way when He is ready. Until then we just do as she says, and beg God that we could know HIS Truth. Cause no matter how they spin it, there’s only one Truth, and it’s God’s.
Good people were asking a similar question during the great western schism. Was it conceivable that the Catholic Church would have three popes? The answer is no, of course, but God allowed this error to occur. His providential designs must, in their totality, remain a mystery.
Aye, lies mixed with truth. Nearly 4 years ago now I’ve studied Our Lady of Fatima , reading indept books thanks to dear Fr Gruner keeping it preserved for anyone who wanted to know all the details. All I ever knew about it was just prayer n penance , and that’s all I was ever told as a kid it’s the same old song and dance today, nothing new there. but from learning about what Our Lady actually came to warn about, left me in a state of shock for well over a year. For years I knew something was wrong but couldn’t put any explanation to it. There’s nothing they can put out there that can trip me now. I don’t even give such announcements coming from ecumenical priest n bishops a moment of my time because it’s a waste of precious time, which may I add is growing short. N how sad no one mentions the last remedy she gave us to divert this situation, the first five Saturdays to keep us under her mantle during this crisis. ( the only life insurance recommended by Fr Hesse.) How many actually do this devotion ? From what I’ve seen not too many. But this so called divine mercy chaplet is quite popular nowadays, how convienent, it strips the Blessed Virgin Mother of her role and replaces her rosary. I had the pleasure of asking one catholic, who was trying to push this devotion on me to the point of getting angry” are you calling the Mother of God a liar when she herself told us that the remedy given at Fatima was the last remedy God was giving for our time ? ” his response was silence while he looked away.
this crisis is going to continue until Catholics get down on their knees, so many church cats think everything is just wonderful they are blind like I was.
never forget it was the laity who saved the church with their distress n prayers n the past with resistance n outcries against errors that was damaging the church within the hierarchy. to think that we don’t play a part in the involvement of the pope n the bishops world wide to consecrate Russia to the Immacualte Heart of our dear Lady, then Our Lord and lady would not have asked us to pray for the consecration and do what Almighty God wills.
But as time progresses things will worsen to the point that Catholics will become so desperate they will start crying out to God instead of complaining about the pope. All this bad pope Francis stuff is merely a leading up to it and the devil is using it to lead a distraction for some putting their souls at risk without knowing the difference between subjective judgement n objective judgement. Some comments I’ve seen in different catholic websites concerning the pope is alarming. And as far as the Protestants are concerned some are curious while others are given the fuel they need from the conciliar hierarchy in the church to do exactly what they have been doing for 500 years now. So you right about that Louie, they go into all the new writings n dig up stuff to hit us with. One of their favourites is the new catechism teachings on the Muslims. It’s their gasoline they throw in the poorly educated Catholics to scandalize them n attack anything they may have left of the faith. Yeah the dogma of the faith will always be preserved in Portugal, but Our Lady never implied it would be preserved anywhere else, not even in Rome. But then again she already told us at la salette that Rome will loose the faith and become the seat of antichrist, there is only two persons you can trust to tell you the truth and that is Our Lord n Our Lady.
Praying the rosary: how come so many Catholics that are praying the rosary isn’t seeing it ? They are walking around as if they are blind and some glorify Vat II as if it’s the only council in the Church that matters? This Puzzled me for awhile until I looked for answers n prayed about it.
There is one question that I ponder on about Fatima and that is when our Lord in 1931 at Tuy concerning the consecration, gave an allowance frame period for the popes n bishops to do the consecration, exactly 100 years. Is this when Our Lady gave Her official request in 1929 or is it when she first mentioned she would come later to ask for this request. The current situation in the church n the world, gives me pause on this 12 year window. All I can say is Blessed Mother Mary help us.
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g12htArt2_TwoSisterLucys.htm
Nice try, where are the words we know for a fact are in undisclosed part of the third secret: “In Portugal, the dogma of faith will be preserved, etc..”?
Good morning kellyann,
It was good to read your essay as your understanding of the crisis the True Church is suffering in this time, of the synthesis of all heresies, Modernity. It would seem that the last step in your analysis is the lynch pin point, as it relates the madness and chaos of what is happening in what I will call, “the church”, small case “c” intended. Synonyms are “new church”, “novus ordo church”, and “vc ii church”. Our Blessed Dominus Deus Sabbaoth and Savior, Jesus the Christ Himself commanded in Matthew 5:37, “Let your yea be yea and your no be no. Anything else is from the devil.” It really is quite simple from here, as that which a childlike faith will accept. Our Blessed Lord Jesus was commanding His Apostles in Mt 5:37 to teach clearly the faithful, as any distortion in the plain Truth was of the Evil One. After all, the True Church is the Divine Teacher of the Faith, as commanded by the Son of God made Man. This understanding then is the lead in to the reality of the only thing the “new church” can be and that is of the devil and not the Mystical Body of Christ our Lord and Redeemer. The post vatican ii, false council, “new church” is simply not the Church of Christ Jesus, One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic, outside of which there is no salvation. Let us just focus on “extra ecclesia nulla salus”, the deFide teaching of the True Church which remains, as it only can, until the end of time, a deFide teaching. Are we really to believe that the “new church” affirms, catechizes, and thus herself believes, in the understanding of lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi, that outside of her there simply is no salvation possible for the eternal soul of that (any) human person? The straightforward and simple response, that which a childlike reception of the Faith yields, and that which is rightly reasoned, is simply NO. Why? Because Nostra Aetate and Dignitatus Humanae specifically teach antithetically to the deFide teaching, extra ecclesia nulla salus. Any and all other intellective understandings do, as they only can, cause cognitive dissonance, that conflict which finds its wellspring deep within the interiority of the human person.
Once this reality is accepted, by virtue of the free will assent, that the “novus ordo church” is not Catholic, all of the “priestly” sodomy, pederasty, satanic pedophilia, internal contradiction in teaching, blasphemy, heresy, sacrilege, perverse exegesis and its consequent catechesis, essentially no vocations, etc., only makes common sense. The cognitive dissonance that once was, then evaporates. But how can this be?, you may ask. Who then is the “Pope”? The utter reality, plain, simple, and undistorted, is that the anti-Church, which of course the “new church” can only be, with Lucifer as its progenitor acting as an “angel of light”, simply CANNOT have a Holy Roman Pontiff as its chief shepherd, rather it does have and has had since 1958, wolves in sheep’s clothing, as willfully, diabolically disoriented men, who are anti-Popes. The Holy Roman Pontiff of the One True Church has been invisible since the death of Cardinal Siri (elevated to the Chair in 1958 as Pope Gregory XVII and forced to abdicate under duress) in 1989. As Our Lady of LaSalette promised, “The Church will be in eclipse, the world will be in dismay”. A simple question orders itself immediately from this promise of Our Lady, our Love, our Mother, the Mother of the One Who Is Love, which is this: if the Church is in eclipse, how can the Holy Roman Pontiff who is the Singular Monarch in the Chair of Saint Peter as the Vicar of Christ, not also be? If the Barque is not visible, neither can the “captain” be. Again, this simply only requires the reception of a childlike faith to know.
It would seem that never before in the history of the world has such a deception been parlayed over mankind by Lucifer. Lucifer, in order to create a deception the likes of which had never been known heretofore, could only use the Church of Jesus Christ as his wellspring, to parlay his summa and summit of quintessential deception. This anti-Church, Luciferian from its nascent genesis, the “novus ordo church”, is all but perfectly juxtaposed to the One True Church of Jesus the Christ, while at once it is inverted, leading souls to hell and not to Heaven. As it occupies and controls the temporal edifice of the True Church, this reality can only exceedingly amplify the magnitude of the Luciferian deception. And in this understanding as Saint Paul taught in his Letter to the Romans, ch 1, versus 18-32, “they [we] have no excuse”. The novus ordo church is taking souls to hell and each has no excuse because the intellective blindness is ultimately willful. To suggest otherwise is to suggest that Superabundant Grace does not exist, that Grace which is a gift of Almighty God, and is both freely given and completely undeserved. Like any gift, if it is not opened and received, it is of no use to the receiver. This is a most and exquisitely sorrowful reality. In sum, we are living the Great Apostasy which could only find its wellspring in the One, True Church. The overwhelming majority of the 1.2 billion baptized Catholics alive today are in apostasy and they are blinded to the reality of it, as I was, not too long ago, thanks be to God and praise be to God. So called, “Saint Pope John XXIII” was a Freemason. So called “Blessed Pope Paul VI” was a Freemason and an active sodomite while residing in the false chair of peter, at once residing in the chair of the anti-Church, which could only find its genesis in the mind of Lucifer, masquerading as an angel of light. Find the work of the holy Don Luigi Villa, God rest his beautiful soul, here: http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/Our_Lady_of_Good_Success.html
Don Luigi was, at the behest of Padre Pio, given the task of rooting out Ecclesiastical Freemasonry from the highest levels of the Church. He was told by Padre Pio that, “this is God’s Will for you”, to spend the rest of his ecclesial life (which turned out to be about 50 years) in this task. He died about 3 months before the “abdication” of the anti-Pope BXVI. There were 7 assassination attempts on his life during that time. The last True Pontiff, Pius XII, gave Don Luigi a “Papal Mandate” to accomplish this task which was asked of him, with Cardinal Ottiavani, as the Prefect of the Holy Office, along with two other faithful Cardinals, tasked with providing him clandestine access to the Vatican, opening all channels for his work to come to fruition. Don Luigi, at the genesis of this work, asked Padre Pio whether Freemasonry had already entered the Church. His response was that Freemasonry had already entered the slippers of the Roman Pontiff, who at the time was anti-Pope Paul VI.
In closing, to know the Truth is to receive the Peace of Christ Jesus in your heart, that which the world cannot ever give. These truths of our time simply are, as they can only be, our reality. As you aptly pointed out, Our Lady of LaSalette promised us that, “Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the anti-Christ”. Right reason would suggest that the preparation for the revelation of the person of the anti-Christ has been in play since 1958. How much time can we have left? How could there be imagined a deception the likes of the “new church”, as being the false church of the anti-Christ, somehow one upped in the future? This is the summa and summit of deception, quintessential, and par excellence. The signs of the chaos of Lucifer are now everywhere to be seen. Even the weather is globally chaotic, which the Luciferians blame on the human persons, who God commanded to be fruitful and multiply. This notion of the now, so called, “climate change”, is fully anti-human as it is fully anti-Christ. Lucifer has been given more power through the free will assents of God’s human persons who deny Him. The signature of Lucifer is chaos. We are living the Great Chastisement, as what chastisement could be greater than the Church of Jesus Christ being in eclipse along with His Vicar in this world? Our most Blessed Lady of Fatima and Guadalupe please pray for us and dispense of your mercy as the Mediatrix of all grace and mercy, in this time of utter darkness. Amen. Alleluia. In caritas.
Thanks john6. Many including myself have seen these pictures. To me it is obvious. How much more in your face can this get? Amazing. It is just amazing that this isn’t exposed. It is of course attacked though. So are so many who have their eyes opened to the Truth. Sorry, but once God allows someone’s eyes to be opened, to the Truth, there is no closing them. This results in various persecutions which are personal in experience to each if us. When you are crushed by these persecutions and at your lowest and are feeling the pain in your heart, cry tears of joy and know that this is from God. Think of how horrific it is that Our Lord’s face was spit upon, that He was struck with many blows up His Sacred Face, and rejoice in your heart that you have been chosen to take a small one on the chin for Him. This is when you must choose to turn the other cheek.
Where do the promises of Our Lady of Fatima fit into your theory, specifically the consecration of Russia by the Pope and all the bishops of the world and the subsequent period of peace?
Hello John314,
The consecration of Russia is of course an existential, temporal reality, which has not been accomplished and thus must yet be. The presumption however, as it regards the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary our Mother and the Mother of God, is that it will be an existential reality which is to be sensually experienced, and as thus known potentially by every inhabitant in the world at the time. Christ Jesus the Lord, commanded in the Gospel of John, ch 14, “Peace I leave with you. My peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give it to you. Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid.” This “period of peace” spoken of must be, as it only can be, that which is the Peace of Christ. This is the same Peace known by the holy Martyr as his blood is being shed and as thus he is literally embroiled in vitriolic, satanic violence and yet he remains in Peace (in Christ Jesus), that Peace which is Infinite and Omnipotent. Our Immaculate Heart of Mary could never suggest a peace that was not the Peace of Christ, her Beloved Son, as their Hearts beat as One, and this Peace is inerrantly known to be, “not as the world gives do I give it to you”. The world is utterly blind to this Peace, in knowing Him and suffering with Him, in each our own infinitesimal ways. The world is the flesh, that which is sensually experienced and fallen, in our concupiscence, the allure of the world, and the temptation of the Evil One. There will only be Peace in the world at the Second Coming of the Son of God, made Man, as there is only true Peace when there is true Justice, as He comes as the Infinite Judge, while at once His mercy ends.
The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary is known within the hearts of the truly faithful members of the Divine Society on earth. Her Immaculate Heart is, as it only can be, triumphant and yet this triumph is not known by the world, as the world rejects her as it rejects and crucified her Beloved Son. Christ Jesus foretold and thus commanded that reality as well in the Gospel of John, chapter 14, when He said and I paraphrase: Soon I will be leaving you, as I will be returning to the Father Who Loves Me. If you love Me you should be joyful for Me. But the Father will not leave you alone, He will send you the Holy Ghost, the Blessed Paraclete, Who will remind you of all that I taught you and teach you more. The world will not know Him nor see Him but you will. You see, John314, as the world is blind to the Spiritual action of the Divine Spouse of the Blessed Mother of God, so will the world be blind to the triumph of her Immaculate Heart and the Peace which that brings.
Lastly, the conversion of Russia to the Singular and Only True Faith is also an existential, temporal reality which has obviously not occurred. What has occurred is the negative promise of the spreading throughout the world of the “errors of Russia”, to be understood as secular, satanic humanism, whereby man proclaims himself to be as God and as thus exercises the “Will to Power” dialectic of Nietchze, which can only take us into global murder and mayhem. As we know, the conversion of Russia awaits the consecration, and as we write the Holy Roman Pontiff who presides over Christ’s Church in this world, remains in eclipse as does the Holy and True Church. In caritas.
Well one thing is for certain the modernist are not men of good will.
I like your idea of exploring Fatima, and its best to keep it among those who have Devotion for Our Lady who is our dear Mother n Queen and have the deepest respect for her message.
Good afternoon to you.
On many points I agree with you on the situation we are living in, we are living in Our Lady’s message, but like my question which gives me pause the pope is another question, I somethimes stare at his picture n ask where is he? Wheres the Holy Father?
Do u recall what Our Lord n Lady said about the Holy Father in our times ? Yes they called him the Holy Father. She also spoke about two worm ridden popes in La Salette.
Worm ridden : what is she referring to here, a dead body ? Or a dead soul within a living body , or a living body n soul with a dead faith?
Is she referring back to what Our Lord said ? Quote ” I know thy works, that thou hast the name of being alive: and thou art dead.” End quote. It’s quite clear Our Lord is referring to apostasy very will hidden from the human senses, but He can see it very plainly.
And who are these two popes she is referring to, you call the last five popes antipopes, but She only speaks of two worm ridden popes Who are they? Is She according to your claim missing three popes? I think not, but I think she is referring to apostates. We were given a clue to this ! As per the cardinal said of the contents of the third secret quote ” the apostasy begins at the top.” End quote.
And if all we have according to your claim are antipopes , as Gregory is now dead, who’s gonna perform the consecration of Russia?
Our Lord n Lady never once refers to the Holy Father who will finally obey Our Lords instructions as a antipope. They never onced used the term anti pope. Now why is that? And shouldn’t we in this chaistisement follow their example ? As we are in no position to be doing such things.
And our lord expressed his dissatisfaction in the disobedience of the popes n bishops when they didn’t obey Our Lady’s announcement of the request in 1929. He instead said that they will fall into misfortune like that of the king of France. The French Revolution type – the king was usurped from his throne a holy duty to govern over the temporial n spiritual welfare of his people in union with the holy father in Rome, was imprisoned n publicly excuted like a common criminal, and his country fell into such a blood soaked state, many Catholics took on red martyrdom. It all began with just a few freemasons starting with a tiny movement followed by moving into propaganda to fool the masses. Our Lord who is the master of human history was giving us this as an example to us this is what will be repeated in disobedience to my request if they like the King of France delay in the execution of my command. ( history repeating itself all over again not just in one country but world wide, with the free masons again leading at the helm behind their secret curtain of blasphemy ). The king didn’t publicly consecrate his throne to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, Louie XVI instead did it in his cell on the morning of his execution, by then It was too late. And was not done in accordance to Our Lords request. The French monarchy was abolish n replaced with a secular Godless government.
The French Revolution prefigures the Fatima message Our Lord gave us this one vital event in history which we can use as a guide within the current epoch of Fatima. This time dealing with the throne of St Peter and with the people from the divine mouth of truth, the promise that this time in our epoch it will be done according to his specifications. Our hope of assurance right out of the mouth of God.
Our Lord said it will be late but they will do it, this part of Our Lords sentence “will be late ” this delay surely has its roots in the modernist who are now in control of the Vatican and desire to destroy the Fatima message. It’s all out revolt worst than that of the heretic Dr Martin Luther. Because this revolt is on the inside this time. Just as it was in the French monarchs privy council. Wicked men schooling him in error which lead him to his own fall. They succeeded in conviencing the King to support the American revolution which is still glorified as something of great progress. They used this to empty his coffers n line their own for their agenda. Which they then used to turn the French people against him n the queen by using propaganda…..oh the lies that Fooled the mobs yet they were lead by the very usurpers who caused their grief n pinned it all on the King by using the kings seal.
speaking of the apostasy which is the greatest we have ever seen in the church.
our Lord n Lady never once calls the popes ( anti ) in our time, maybe because it’s not the time to place judgement on them. Rather it’s a time of punishment On us. The post Vat II popes is clearly a punishment on us. Do you see what you are over looking here concerning the popes which troubles our souls? God wills it because of our disobedience.
According to church teaching all of us are in no position in the church to make judgement on the pope. Nor would I desire such a position, So I refuse publicy resort to name calling. I’m just a simple Catholic which is the only dignity I have in me as defined by Pope St Pius X.
But in accordance with tradition n the pronouncements of Past Popes we can clearly see the errors of the conciliar popes. All that is required from me as a simple Catholic is to Follow Our Lady’s instructions n learn the faith that was lost before I grew into my senses to know better. No catechism was taught when I went to school.
Vat II simply put; is noting but the platform, which the modernist use to springboard their synthesis of all heresies wrapped up in a big ball and thrown at us all at once.
Norvus ordo a corruption to fool the masses n usurp the law of what has to be prayed is the law of what has to be believed into something anti-Catholic.
In church teaching from a faithful catholic priest who stays true to the Holy Latin rite n Sacred Traditions teachings, of the church, spoke about this angel in revelations, the angel who is given the keys to open the bottomless pit to unchain the devil n allow hell to be unleashed on the earth is non other than the keys of St. Peter which binds n loose all things in Our Lords absence as He promised they would do. In that case than, the pit was opened long before pope Francis came to the throne. The rock of Peter has been shifted to allow the smoke of satan to enter the church. So by seeing the damage the smoke from hell can do, i shutter to think of the full blown regin of the antichrist can do. Could this have something to do with the two worm ridden popes? My Catholic soul becomes alarmed at the very taught of it. What if pope Leo’s overheard conversation is still coming To pass, what if Our Lord seeing the bad behaviour in Catholics has allowed this hour of hell to chaistise by God providence in order to correct us n save our souls been granted an allotted time longer than we may have anticipated ? I don’t see restoration yet. Truth be told we have lost the faith in this past 50 years, and I’ll be the first one to admit it with deep sorrow.
What if God has to under no fault but our own, put back into our hearts the fear of himself as this has been lost and is a most principled foundation of the dogma of the faith. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.
One thing is for certain in Her Motherly guidance to us, Her advice to first stop sinning, pray n repent n pray much for the holy father, the consecration of Russia n pray for the trapped souls In Purgatory as well as for lost souls and last but most importantly return to the one true Catholic Apostolic faith has not met up to Almighty Gods satisfaction by the masses.so God will grant the devil to continue shifting the pope as wheat.
On the history which we have concerning the devotion to Her Immaculate Heart that God wishes to establish in the world. This is Gods providence which involves Our Lords ministers supported by us in prayer sacrifice n reparations to the Holy Hearts of Heaven.
And that’s all I have to say about the popes. please forgive my poor typing.
O most Virgin Mother of sorrows, please pray for us,
God bless you.
It takes a lot of time to see all this Katherine. Ten years in my case. At the time of the Conciliar revolution, Catholics on the whole just followed what the hierarchy said, because that’s what Catholics do.
Only few of the laity were onto things from the very beginning. The late, great Patrick Henry Omlor was one of the first on the scene, with his classic landmark “Questioning the validity of the Masses using the new, all-English canon” in 1968.
I heard an anecdote about him from 1965. Paul VI was addressing the United Nations in New York and the Omlors were at home watching him on the TV. When Paul VI said in his speech that the UN was the last hope for the world, Patrick turned to his wife and said, “That man cannot possibly be the Pope”. This was in 1965!
But for the majority it took years, even decades before the rotten nature of Vatican II and the Novus became sufficiently apparent to greater numbers of layfolk. People are on a journey. We are the laity. We didn’t start this, and ordinarily, Catholics didn’t have to read up on sacramental theology, councils, encyclicals or canon law. With the internet, this is now very easy, but again, it takes time.
Hello again Katherine. The SSPX have not done anything. The media beats up stories on Bishop Fellay and how he’s ready to sign some “deal”. But look closely: The spin all comes from the Vatican side to divide and conquer the largest traditionalist group in the world, the SSPX. It seems to be working a treat too. Bishop Fellay is not stupid, and he’s not a sellout either. If any deal is done, then it will be on the condition that nothing will change in the Society. I love the Society and attend there exclusively, (I keep my opinion about the post Vatican II non-popes to myself though) and I hope it doesn’t happen. but if it does, I will just wait and see how it turns out.
I wouldn’t be too concerned about the mention of an antipope. That’s just the name we give to false claimants to the papacy. Technically there is only an antipope when there is a true Pope in St Peter’s Chair. This is not the case today. Perhaps that’s why there is no mention of that term.
The infallible teaching of the Church is that public heretics are not Catholics, i.e. outside the Church; non-members of the Church, not even if they wear a white cassock and call themselves Pope.
Heretics are not Catholics, and cannot hold any office in the Church, by Divine Law.
This was all done before the internet was ever conceived. The malefactors could never have imagined that after all their careful scheming and rare public appearances of the post-1959 “Sr Lucy” that such a thing as the internet would be invented. Never.
They had no idea that one day in the near future, people would easily and plainly be able to put photos of the real Sr Lucy and the fake “Sr Lucy” side by side, and easily spot the impostor & uncover the massive fraud at work.
Good Friday morning kellyann,
Thank you and God bless and keep you. You’re response is fact-filled and as thus fodder for much further discussion. I will try to keep this as brief as possible and touch on what seems to be your deepest reflection: Who is the Pope now and who were the “Popes” since 1958? Firstly, “The Papal Subject” pointed out my incorrect term- of-use as “Anti-pope”. An Anti-pope is a false claimant to the Holy See in opposition to another who is validly and as thus, canonically elected (as per “Catholic Encyclopedia”). Then, to further clarify, we would have had Anti-popes occupying the Chair from 1958-1989 ( J XXIII, P VI, JP I, and JP II until 1989), the year that Cardinal Siri, as Pope Gregory XVII, died. Since 1989, the logic follows then, that the Holy See has been vacant.
Was Siri the Pope that our Blessed Lady commented on when she said—- and the one who should speak will remain silent? I don’t recall which of the 4 most recent Church approved apparitions that prophetic comment is from with certainty but I believe it was LaSalette. As you point out kellyann, regarding the two “worm ridden” Popes that Our Lady of LaSalette mentioned, it would seem that leaves us with BXVI and Francis who stake claim to the Chair of Saint Peter, while at once they are dead inside, thus “worm ridden”. We know from inerrant Holy Scripture, from the Mouth of our Blessed Redeemer that— you will know them by their fruits. Divine Revelation will not, as it cannot, ever contradict “right reason”, as right reason originates in the Mind of God, and His miserable human creatures then can only know right reason as they participate in the Mind of God (St. Thomas, Summa Theologiae). That said, right reason then follows that if two “Popes” are “worm ridden” and as thus, spiritually dead, they cannot truly be Pontiffs, as only a Catholic man who holds the Faith can be. Further, our Blessed Mother and the Mother of God prophetically stated that the “tomb of Peter” would be transferred to Fatima during the “kingdom of John Paul II”. I believe that it was in 1984 when anti-Pope JPII transferred a quarter of the tomb of Peter to Fatima, Portugal, where Our Lady promised the Faith would be preserved, as Rome would lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist (LaSalette). As you stated, kellyann, no one has the authority to question the dictates of the Pope when he is actively teaching from the General or the Extra-Ordinary Magisterium. That said, these men were not Popes and as thus they have no protection of the Infallible Charism of the Holy Ghost. Remember the words of our Lord and our God—You will know them by their fruits. Also, the sheep know their “True Shepherd” when they hear his voice.
If anyone has spent any time critically reading and understanding the perversion of Truth which Joseph Ratzinger has written over his entire clerical life, it is pristinely clear the man is an apostate, at least since his pre-bishopric years as a priest, theologian, and professor. An apostate, who by definition is a baptized Catholic in this context, has left the Faith by virtue of their rejection of Her deFide teaching. Almighty God never leaves a baptized Catholic hanging alone. There is always a clear path amidst the murky waters, as He also commanded—-He who seeks the Truth shall find it.
Why would Our Lady use the term, “kingdom of JPII”, if she was speaking of him as the Holy Roman Pontiff? Our Lady would never use a term to mislead nor confuse us, ever. Is the term of use, “kingdom”, that which is rendered to reflect the domain of jurisdiction of the Holy Father? Not that I am aware. As you stated regarding King Louie XVI, as it relates the words of our Blessed Lord (to Sr. Lucia), in your words, “…they will fall into misfortune like that of the king of France.” Certainly the domain of a king is his kingdom and “…they [these “Popes”] will fall into misfortune like that of the king of France.”, who indeed lost his kingdom and then went to the guillotine later. The Church in this world has lost its Vicar of Christ in the visible Chair of Saint Peter. Well, we know with historic certitude, that none of these “Popes” lost their heads to the guillotine as did King Louie XVI, and thus Our Lady was not giving us a “blue print” for what was to occur, as there is always holy mystery involved. Without the mystery, God would be giving us pure Truth, which this side the veil we do not see, as this side the veil, faith is required of us and this Faith serves as our bridge to the Truth, Who Is the Person of Jesus the Christ. This mystery is accessible though, through utter submission of one’s own miserable human creatureliness vis a vis the operation of the free will, placed into the Will of God. This brings to mind the Gospel of John, ch 14 and I paraphrase and summarize: Soon I will be leaving you as I will be returning to the Father Who Loves Me. If you love Me, you will be joyful for Me. But the Father will not leave you alone. He will send you the Holy Ghost, the Blessed Paraclete, Who will remind you of all I taught you and teach you more. THE WORLD WILL NOT KNOW HIM nor SEE HIM but YOU WILL.
Finally, as to the question, “who and/or where is the Pope now?”, the answer I believe rests in the apparitions of LaSalette and Fatima, where Our Lady made the prophetic statement: (LaSalette) “The Church will be in eclipse, the world will be in dismay.” Right reason can only follow then, that if the “Church” is in “eclipse”, it is not visible at that time, while at once it certainly exists at that time and until the end of time as our Blessed Lord and our God commanded in Mt 16:18. As in a solar eclipse, while the sun is not visible then, it certainly yet exists as the sun, in that time. Where Peter is, so is the Church. As the Church is not visible while it is in eclipse, it follows then, nor can Peter be visible in eclipse. Our Lady of LaSalette: “Rome will lose the Faith and become the Seat of the Antichrist”. Also, “The Church will have a frightful crisis.” Our Lady of Fatima prophesied that “the tomb of Peter” would be transferred to Fatima and that the integrity of the Faith would be preserved there. Fatima, Portugal, that same place where Our Lady appeared to the three shepherd children. Was she telling us that the role of the Chief Shepherd would be assumed by Her Immaculate Heart? Is that an aspect of the Triumph of her Immaculate Heart? Rome lost the Faith in 1958 and began the preparation for the person of the Antichrist to take his seat there as the “abomination of desolation”. Is that not a “frightful crisis” for the Church, One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic? God bless you and yours’, kellyann. I know your response has helped me. I pray this helps you. In caritas.
So basically since 1958, no new priests, bishops etc have valid holy orders?
Therefore there are statistically speaking almost no real masses being celebrated, Novus masses do not have Eucharist, and confessions are all invalid as well?
Basically if a priest is younger than 62. He is not a Catholic priest that can perform real priestly duties?
Am I off on these assumptions?