The Transhumanist Threat: Real or imagined? -

The Great Reset. Transhumanism. The New World Order.

Prophesies warning about this terrifying triumvirate of totalitarianism abound, but what are we to make of them? Do fantastic stories about brain chips and globalists speak to a bona fide threat to humanity, or are they merely figments of the tinfoil hatted imagination?

We will begin our search for an answer by first considering the mainstream narrative. Thankfully, the Anti-Defamation League has provided it in summary form:

One can see long-standing and familiar right-wing conspiracy tropes at play in the Great Reset conspiracy, including the notion that a group of elites are working to undermine national sovereignty and individual freedoms, references to a “New World Order,” and the idea that these malicious actors will seek to exploit a catastrophic incident—like a global pandemic—to advance their agenda.
A common undercurrent among proponents is a mistrust of vaccines, which they believe will be forced upon people to fulfill the nefarious objectives of Bill Gates or the pharmaceutical industry.
There are strains of the conspiracy that also delve into darker territory. Some have alleged that the WEF and global elites are engaged in a transhuman project, in which humans will be fused with machines and forced to be subservient to elites. ^[i]

This pretty much settles it for me: When the leftist narrative is that there’s nothing to see here, then I think we had better take a very close look. Upon doing so in this case, it doesn’t take long to discover that the transhumanist threat is entirely real; nearly every “trope” that the ADL dismisses is a genuine looming threat.

Specifically, the Great Reset really is all about undermining national sovereignty and, primarily, individual freedoms. Indeed, it is beyond question that there is an effort under way to exploit COVID (or climate change, or whatever the crisis of the day may be) in order to advance the globalist agenda. Moreover, Big Pharma is most certainly a major player in this arena, and there is very good reason to mistrust their vaccines, especially when they are mandated by the public authority without informed consent.

No, these are not mere “conspiracy theories” as the ADL and other leftist outlets insist. Don’t take it from me, take it from Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum and co-author of the book, COVID-19: The Great Reset. ^[ii]

“The corona pandemic … does not constitute an existential threat, or a shock that will leave its imprint on the world’s population for decades,” Schwab casually admits. “The consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality will be mild compared to previous pandemics.”

So why, one wonders, is the WEF pushing for “an annual program to vaccinate billions” against COVID, stressing the supposed necessity of making and distributing “enough vaccines for every person in the world – around 15-20 billion doses” every single year? ^[iii]

“Could the COVID-19 pandemic mark the onset of a turning point with long-lasting and dramatic consequences for our world today,” Schwab asks?

The answer to Schwab’s rhetorical question is as obvious as the title to his book:

For the WEF and its confreres at the United Nations, COVID is first and foremost an opportunity, one that the globalists are determined to leverage for all its worth in order to “reset” the world.

We have witnessed, and are witnessing, the playbook in action: Experts declare a global emergency; leaders of nations follow suit; big media ratchets up the fear, censoring dissenting voices; unelected bureaucrats/specialists issue baseless guidelines, which government officials use to justify the suspension of civil rights.

The details of this power play (e.g., the particular crisis, the dire warnings, the proposed remedy) are changeable, but the endpoint will always remain the same, namely, to suspend personal autonomy, circumvent the rule of law and obliterate the democratic process in whatever form it may exist, all in favor of imposing a technocratic dictatorship.

In his book, COVID: The Great Reset, Schwab praises those “leaders and decision-makers” who “take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting” policies that fit the WEF agenda. He openly applauds those public authorities that “make ‘good use’ of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste.”

This is why the globalists and their lackies in public authority throughout the world refuse let go of the demonstrably false COVID narrative; they consider it the ideal fuel for accelerating their agenda, Agenda 2030, to be more specific.

Lest there be any doubt about the symbiotic relationship between the Great Reset and Agenda 2030, in June of 2019, the UN announced that it had executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the WEF “to jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda.” ^[iv]

Among other things, the MOU calls for “Collaboration between the UN and the Forum to meet the needs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” aka, the Great Reset. ^[v]

This brings us to the primary subject of the present article, namely, the undeniable fact that the World Economic Forum, the UN, and their stable of globalist elites are indeed committed to transhumanism, a program by which human beings will be implanted with technological devices.

Those charged with selling the idea to the public will focus, undoubtedly, on the ways in which implanted technological devices, like brain chips, will provide individuals with immediate access to a broad range of data, giving them greater knowledge and cognitive abilities than they can even imagine.

These devices, however, will be designed to provide two-way access. That is the unspoken part of the plan, the part where we risk losing not just our civil liberties, but our humanity.

Make no mistake, in the transhumanist future, the technocratic ruling class will have access to individual persons and entire populations, enabling the civil authorities to surveil and to control where we go, what we eat, how much we spend and on what we spend it, etc. The technology may even go so far as to allow the powers-that-be to not only read, but to determine what we think and feel.

While it may be tempting to dismiss the transhumanist aims of the WEF, the United Nations, and others as mere science fiction, the technology is being developed as I write.

Again, don’t take it from me.

Meet Carlos Creus Moreira (left), a globalist mover-and-shaker, an insider’s insider with unimpeachable New World Order credentials:

MEMBER: UN Global Compact

MEMBER: Global Clinton Initiative

MEMBER: World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council ^[vi]

As proudly stated in his LinkedIn profile, Moreira has been “going to Davos for 20 years.” Evidently, he has been steadily ascending the ranks at the World Economic Forum from day one:

Founding Member WEF Global Growth Companies 2007. WEF New Champion 2007 to 2016, Vice-Chair WEF Agenda Council on Illicit Trade 12/15, Member of the Selection Committee for the WEF Growth Companies. Founder of the Geneva Security Forum. Member of the WEF Global Agenda Council on the Future of IT. ^[vii]

Moreira’s commitment to the Great Reset (aka the Fourth Industrial Revolution) is beyond question:

I am very positive about the consequences of this Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the transhuman code, which is the platform for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. ^[viii]

NB: Transhumanism is part and parcel of the Great Reset. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that transhumanism is foundational to the entire globalist enterprise.

Moreira is the Founder and CEO of WISeKey, a large multinational cybersecurity firm specializing in digital identity ecosystems, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things. ^[ix] He’s also the co-author of the book, The TransHuman Code. ^[x]

His company, WISeKey, has been tapped to make the WEF’s transhumanistic vision for the future a reality in partnership with the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC).

Established in 2005, the UNAOC describes itself as “a High-Level Group of experts formed to explore the roots of polarization between societies and cultures today, and to recommend a practical programme of action to address this issue.”

Sounds lovely, no?

On closer inspection, however, it’s a technocratic nightmare.

Among the UNAOC’s “practical programmes of action” is the so-called One Humanity project, which includes development of One Humanity ID, a digital identity application designed to manage all manner of electronic transactions and, of course, personal data.

Imagine that, all of humanity – our individual activities, affiliations, movements, and even our perceptions (as we shall see) – consigned to a single One Humanity data base. What could possibly go wrong?

When Moreira describes the globalist-technocrat vision of human life after the Great Reset, one would do well to pay attention; the man knows of what he speaks.

We are becoming transhuman. Transhuman means that we are going to be enhanced, we are going to be accelerated. Our organs are going to be replaced. Implants are going to be ‘spinning’ or thinking.^[xi]
What’s going to happen is that the humanity is going to become transhumanity, in the good sense of the transhumanity, in the sense that we are going to be transcending from where we are now, as a human with all the limitations we have, to that superhuman.^[xii]

According to Moreira, humankind is superior now, but there is a great deal of room for improvement, and we now have the technological tools at our disposal to cross the divide between the mere “human” and the “superhuman.”

The human itself, we are the most perfect, so far, piece of whatever we’re going to call it, what is a biological technology, that now is going to be enhanced with electronic technology which is exactly the plan that we are doing now. Our biology is going to be enhanced by hardware, and chips, and artificial intelligent code, that the only thing they are going to do is to expand our potential to places that that potential has not been able to reach yet. ^[xiii]

Note very well the language: For the globalist elite, the human isn’t a person made in the image and likeness of God, endowed with the self-awareness, the liberty, and the freewill to seek and to live the truth in all things, able to make informed decisions for himself, his family, and his community. Rather – despite all of their flowery platitudes about individual privacy, inclusivity and solidarity – for the Schwabs and Moreiras of the world, the human is merely a piece of biological technology.

You see, the globalist elite genuinely believe that they know best how to get the most out of each one of the billions of human “pieces” that move about the earth, if only they can develop and implement a way to surveil their activities, track their output, measure their consumption, and monitor even their thoughts and opinions.

Their vision of a transhumanist future has little to do the betterment of individuals or families or even nations, rather, it is geared toward enhancing the value of each “piece of biology” with respect to its contribution to the planet as a whole, the same over which they have appointed themselves to sit as rulers and masterminds.

“So, that is an unstoppable process,” Moreira insists as if it is too late to even think of derailing their plans for the future. ^[xiv]

“I mean, China is taking the lead,” he notes, “but you have now [Elon] Musk and others that are coming and implanting things in your brain so you can articulate yourself in a better way, or you can improve your mental capabilities, which is OK, provided that it is done ethically.” ^[xv]

Yes, that Elon Musk, the hero du jour of far too many on the impetuous political right.

Take note: Moreira has just given us a preview of the transhumanist sales pitch:

Step right up and get your One Humanity ID and your brain chip! Improve your mental capabilities! Don’t worry, we pledge to make certain that the entire operation is carried out ethically!

What exactly does “ethical” mean in this context? Writing in his book, The Transhuman Code, Moreira offers the following:

Ethics – Improving the human condition is paramount to realizing the full potential of our future. Therefore, a universal code of ethics reflecting the highest order of human values will govern the development, implementation, and use of technology.

OK, but who will be charged with determining what is necessary in order to improve the human condition? Who is to say what the highest order of human values actually are? Who precisely will be called upon to “govern” in these matters?

HINT: It’s not going to be the individual citizen. If you don’t believe it, just ask the millions of persons who were forced to take an experimental COVID vaccine, apart from informed consent, ostensibly in order to “stop the spread” of the virus to the rest of society – a premise now widely recognized as a blatant lie.

Moreira insists that the transhumanist future will be devoid of a central authority, what he calls “a global governor of technology.” ^[xvi]

The UNOC’s Manifesto in Favor of One Humanity leaves no room for doubt, however, that there absolutely will be a governor of technology, be it global or otherwise, as it plainly states:

Considered
That the development of artificial intelligence instruments is bringing humanity into this new era at great speed, and it is essential to strengthen its proper use by public authorities, to improve service to citizens and advance in a solid public-private partnership, which overcome the obstacles that any innovative process entails and facilitate good coordination between inventors, developers, entrepreneurs, unions, citizens and regulators. ^[xvii]

Did you get that? The “proper use” of AI instruments (that is, the technological devices that will be implanted into human persons, like brain chips) will be determined “by public authorities” as they see fit in order to (allegedly) “improve service to citizens.”

And what exactly will these instruments be able to do?

According to the UNOC’s Manifesto:

The development of artificial intelligence will also have a great impact on the human brain, having the potential to alter personalities, perceptions and cognitive abilities. ^[xviii]

So, when the public authorities decide that altering your personality, your opinions, and even your ability to think will provide a service to the greater number of citizens (or merely the ones to whom they are beholden), what do you suppose will happen?

Let us hope and pray that we never find out.