Both Donald Trump and Elijah Cummings say that every American citizen deserves a quality education. Only one of them, however, is working to make that happen.
I grew up in Baltimore, west Baltimore to be more exact; a place that for some two decades running has been the congressional district of Representative Elijah Cummings, D – MD.
In recent days, Cummings has become the poster boy for the liberal left’s irrepressible reliance on the race card as their weapon-of-choice for attacking their political foes, painting poor Elijah as the victim of a racist assault at the hands of President Trump.
Opinions vary, even among Trump supporters, as to how statesmanlike the President’s comments were concerning Cummings’ district. I, however, am far more interested in things objective; like the actual state of affairs in my old neighborhood.
To the chagrin of Cummings’ defenders, much that they would have preferred to go unmentioned has been getting increased national attention thanks to the firestorm that President Trump deliberately ignited; e.g., Baltimore’s urban decay, its rat infestation problem, and last but not least the undeniable statistical fact that his congressional district is the murder capital of the U.S.
Here, we will take a closer look at public education in Baltimore.
According to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau figures, the cost per pupil in the Baltimore City Public School system (pre-K to 12) is $15,168 per year.
As reported by the database Private School Review:
The private elementary school average in Maryland is $10,023 per year and the private high school average is $16,650 per year.
So, what do the children of Baltimore City receive in return for a public school investment that costs roughly the same as (and in many cases more than) a private school education?
According to data taken from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Census, compiled and published at Niche.com:
State Test Scores for Baltimore City Schools (The percentage of students that scored at or above proficiency levels on their state assessment tests.)
Percent Proficient – Reading – 17%
Percent Proficient – Math – 17%
Now, imagine you’re one of the many hardworking, law abiding parents living in my old neighborhood. Not only are you scared to death for the very lives of your children every time they so much as just sit on the front steps, you also know damned well that the chances of them receiving a decent public school education are extremely low.
As such, you cannot help but lament that if only you had the same means as a man like Elijah Cummings, surely you’d exercise your right to send your children to a private school of your choosing. Then again, if you had those means, you wouldn’t be living in west Baltimore in the first place.
The problem, however, isn’t really a financial one.
As the figures above aptly demonstrate, there is more than enough money in the public coffers to afford the parents of west Baltimore a real choice when it comes to where their children go to school.
Clearly, the solution isn’t continuing to dump more and more money into a public school system the budget of which has long failed to correspond to the results it produces. The obvious answer is to make better use of the funds that are already at hand.
One way to do this is through school vouchers; public funds that parents can use to exercise real choice in the matter of educating their children.
So, where does Elijah Cummings stand on the matter of school vouchers? According to his website:
Access to a quality education is not a luxury; it is every child’s right. I believe that we must provide every child with opportunities to be the best that he or she can be, regardless of background, socio-economic status, or geographic location.
In other words, he supports school vouchers, right? Wrong. It ends up that the “pro-choice” Cummings is anything but when it comes to education.
He’s a Democrat politician and, therefore, deeply embedded in the pockets of both the American Federation of Teachers (ACT) and the National Education Association (NEA), the nation’s largest teachers’ unions, longtime contributors to Cummings’ campaigns each.
Both ACT and NEA vehemently oppose school vouchers, and on this front Cummings has consistently proven his worth; not to the public he claims to serve, but to the union bosses.
When, for example, the U.S. House of Representatives was faced with approving on-going funding for a Washington, D.C. school voucher program that by all measures was greatly benefitting families, Cummings stepped up to do the unions’ bidding, protesting:
It’s taking away money from the public school system. They need every dime they can get.
For this, the NEA gave Cummings a “Cheer” in its newsletter “for speaking out against the bill to renew the DC voucher program.”
The Trump Administration, by contrast, has proposed what amounts to a federal school voucher program that will be funded entirely by private, tax-deductible donations.
If passed as part of the 2020 budget, the Education Freedom Scholarships and Opportunity Act will provide a $5 billion annual federal tax credit for voluntary donations made by private individuals to state-based scholarship programs. The scholarships can be used by parents as tuition for their child’s education at schools that choose to participate in the program. As explained on the Department of Education website detailing the program:
This proposal would empower students and families to choose the best educational setting for them – regardless of where they live, how much they make, and how they learn.
This sounds an awful lot like Rep. Cummings’ claim that access to a quality education is every child’s right, regardless of background, socio-economic status, or geographic location. What’s more, it is donor funded and doesn’t take one thin dime away from the public school system.
So, will Cummings support the measure, or will he continue carrying the water for the teachers’ unions that have already come out against it? According to a staffer with whom I spoke in Elijah Cummings’ office, the Congressman has yet to take a public position on the Act. That said for the record, there is no question where his allegiances lie.
Chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, Rep. Bobby Scott, D- VA, has gone on record making it clear that his party is determined to kill the measure, saying that Democrats “will not waste time” on the proposal.
If made available, Education Freedom Scholarships would allow the constituencies of both Scott and Cummings to gain access to the same kinds of choices that more affluent people have when it comes to providing their children with a quality education.
Both President Donald Trump and Representative Elijah Cummings say that all citizens, including those that live in my old neighborhood of west Baltimore, deserve as much. Only one of them, however, is working to make that happen.
The other has long been profiting at the expense of a largely low-income minority constituency, while unhinged, race-baiting liberals feigning compassion for the under-priviledged rush to his defense.
Mr. Cummings states: “I believe that we must provide every child with opportunities to be the best that he or she can be, regardless of background, socio-economic status, or geographic location.”
In order to provide every child with opportunities to be the “best that he or she can be” is clearly not an objective of any kind of public education nor for the majority of so-called “Catholic” schools because none teach what truly matters for human flourishing but more importantly, for eternal salvation, the one, true Catholic faith. Without knowing the essence of one’s existence and purposes of life, no one can be the “best they can be”.
Education has lost all of its true purpose and is only the modern tool of indoctrination into a mentality that fosters unbridled materialism, Socialism, Freemason principles, and or becoming willing slaves of the state.
As cold and selfish as Cummings’s behavior is, against the children he is supposed to serve, I do not trust Trump either. Trump as a casino owner, made money through the sin of gambling. He sought to gain money, by other human beings losing. Many people have lost their homes and families through the snare that is gambling.
Jesus proclaimed: be Holy, for your Father in Heaven is Holy.
Brothers and sisters, please pray for me to be a faithful, holy man. Almighty God bless you.
– Joseph
Trump is surely flawed. But when faced with the choice between Trump and cuckservatives such as Jeb! et. al. and shrill witches such as Hillary et. al., it’s a no-brainer. Sane people simply must choose Trump.
Related:
The Tragedy of Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExKramsqmyU
Also see:
Trump Hints at the Truth About Baltimore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PsXKxUZ7EM
Always enjoy what you have to say.
Yes, compared to the Clintons, a doberman pincer is a better option.
I believe we are best off acknowledging, that we Christians have no representative for president. Trump also stated that he is fine with his daughter becoming a (false, probably talmud) Jew, like her husband. This shows his indifference to Christ our King. Yet to gain the Catholic votes, Trump now backs the pro life stand. Had he ever supported this cause before seeking office?
The truth is we Christians have no president, it’s harsh.
An imperative underlying issue, is that many Catholics falsely believed, that we could actually be members of a Masonic nation. I was fooled for many years.
Christ Is King.
Yes, we’re unrepresented from the top down. Also recall that Trump not only celebrates the perfidious Jews, but also celebrates stinking sodomites. Nevertheless, the choice between Trump and any Democrat is a no-brainer.
Hi, Joseph. You asked for our prayers. So, I just said an Ave for you. Regarding President Trump: yes, he is a deeply flawed man. However, his winning the Presidential was so improbable — EVERY major organized force and nation was against him — and he has done so much to advance the cause for the unborn — what is in his heart only God can know — that I have come to believe God’s active Providence was involved in that election. Further — and I concede this is conjecture, but i do believe it sincerely — I sense that winning and acting as President have changed Trump — not transformed him utterly, but certainly humbled and chastened him. Finally, we shall never have perfect options, and we perhaps even may never have good options for President. So, we do our best…and pray whoever the POTUS is does his or her best. All the best to you, Joseph, — Uta
How many times have we heard, in a discussion on education, one say we must provide what every child needs to be the best they can be? What does that even mean? Who decides what is best and why do they have that kind of authority? What if a child, or more importantly, a parent who after all should be the ultimate authority in their child’s education, doesn’t agree with the decider about what it takes to be their best? They are stuck in an institution where someone has taken it upon themselves to decide what the best for each child should be and how much people must pay to implement their ideas. Of course, none of the decision makers consider for a moment the child’s life beyond this one. That is of no importance for “public” educators and that is why public education is simply one experiment after another concerned only about what the future adult can provide to the state or to the economy. For the entire history of public education, who can honestly prove any of its experiments have proven to help children be “the best they can be” as whose standards are used to prove it? The standards are set arbitrarily by the changing standards (or lack of) of a fickle populace.
There is really only one path to educating children to be the best they can be and it is first and foremost teaching children the truth about God and how by serving Him, they will be the best they can be, not only for themselves, but for the whole of the nation.
Amen.
Thank you for the prayer.