As I write, the world is attempting to digest Israel’s “preemptive” attack on Iran, why it happened, and more importantly, how it might escalate from here.
Hours after the attack, U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, announced that this was a “unilateral action” on the part of Israel, a declaration that appears difficult to reconcile with an earlier statement issued by his boss, and even more out of sync with statements that were later made by Trump.
Numerous commentators on social media aren’t buying Rubio’s denial of direct U.S. involvement. Many are insisting that it is the height of naïveté to imagine that Israel – which everyone knows needs ongoing American financial and military support – acted without the United States’ assistance, foreknowledge, and approval.
The reality is much darker.
One of two things is true: Either Israel attacked Iran without U.S. collaboration (perhaps even against Trump’s stated wishes, as some are suggesting), or the United States was fully complicit. Take your pick.
No matter how you slice it, the only conclusion that one can reasonably draw is that the U.S. serves Israel and its interests, not the other way around. They are the dog; America is the tail. They bark, and all three branches of the federal government, along with the intelligence community and the military, jump.
And make no mistake about it, those Israeli interests are evil.
Zionism: A profile in ungodliness and deception
What is Zionism?
Zionism is the ethno-nationalist project that brought about, maintains, and advances the interests of the modern state of Israel, the so-called “Jewish homeland” that serves as the geographic locus and central command of Christ the King’s enemies throughout the world.
Many naïve persons mistake Zionism for a religious movement that is part and parcel of Judaism, one that is founded upon the belief that the self-identified Jews of today are the flesh and blood descendants of Am Yisrael, the Biblical “People Israel” to whom God granted an irrevocable, fee simple, deed to the Holy Land.
This, however, is a bald-faced lie that was initially concocted and perpetrated by the early leaders of Zionism – men who were overwhelmingly irreligious, secularists, and even atheists – well before the founding of the modern state of Israel in 1948.
Zionism’s religious claim to ownership of the Holy Land, which runs counter to both the Old and New Testaments, is nothing more than an emotionally charged sales pitch designed to secure the support of ill-informed nominal Christians.
Unfortunately, the ploy worked, and it continues to work.
Among the useful idiots in our day that gorge on Zionist lies, as if they are good food for the soul, are men like Donald J. Trump and many of his closest associates.
Early Zionists also made appeals to ethnicity as a stand-alone claim, apart from any benefits allegedly granted by God. They argued that they were simply seeking to reclaim what is rightfully theirs as heirs, what they call the “land of our ancestors” and the “historic homeland of the Jewish people.”
The ancestral argument, however, rings especially hollow given that Canaanite possession of the land predated that of the People Israel, which suggests that any claims to the land put forth by the present-day descendants of the Canaanites (Lebanese, Palestinian, Jordanian, and Syrian persons) carry far more weight.
This being so, justification for the Zionist cause – despite the fact that its leaders were not, and did not claim to be, men of religion – always comes back to the argument “God gave it to us, thus it is ours forever,” a claim that is easily refuted simply by cracking the cover of a Bible.
With regard to Judaism properly so called, it is crucially important to understand that the Jewish religion of the Patriarchs and the Prophets – the religion to which the Blessed Virgin and her divine Son, Jesus Christ, belonged – is now obsolete, and not even the sincerest efforts on the part of today’s self-identified Jews, including the most devout Ultra-Orthodox, can restore it to validity.
As Pope St. Pius X told Theodor Herzl as he refused to lend support to his Zionist cause:
The Jewish religion was the foundation of our own; but it was superseded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot concede it any further validity.
So, if not authentic Judaism, upon what are Zionism, the terrorist state that it spawned, and broader contemporary Jewish identity founded?
The Talmud: “A central pillar”
Israeli Chasidic Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, who is very well known for the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud, said of the ancient Talmudic text (a compendium of rabbinic teaching compiled between roughly the 3rd and 6th centuries A.D.):
It’s a central pillar for understanding anything about Judaism, more than the Bible. The Talmud is not a divine gift given to people. The Jewish people created it. But on the other hand, it created the Jewish people. In so many ways, we’re Talmudic Jews, whether we believe in it or not. (Times of Israel,August 9, 2012)
This is quite an admission and an accurate one at that. We know that God the Chooser (if you will) created the Chosen People, the Biblical children of Israel. Steinsaltz, however, is clear: The Talmud, which is not of divine origin, created the so-called “Jewish people” of today.
NB: They are not one and the same!
What Steinsaltz did not acknowledge, and likely does not recognize, is that the Talmud is not a merely human construct, rather is it a diabolically inspired text. This much is perfectly clear based on its treatment of Our Lord and Our Lady alone.
With respect to Zionism, the “Talmudic people,” and their influence over current events, one notes that the Talmud places a great deal of stress on the Land of Israel, presenting it as a fundamental component of Jewish identity. For example:
Whoever lives outside the land is as if he had no God” and the Sifre that states, “Living in the land of Israel is of equal importance to all the commandments of the Torah. (Ketubot 110b)
In this, we see evidence in support of Rabbi Steinsaltz’s suggestion that the Talmud is in some sense on par with the Torah. Note, however, that Steinsaltz went a step further in stating that it is even more relevant to modern Jewish identity than Scripture.
In our effort to succinctly characterize the Talmudic ethos as made manifest in the behavior of today’s Zionist leaders, one could do no better than Professor Norman Finkelstein, who refers to them as “the Jewish supremacist billionaire class.” I would only add that supremacist is the operative word since this class of highly influential persons includes far more than just billionaires. (Practically speaking, it also includes more than just Jews, as we will discuss.)
Today’s Zionists are the same persons of whom St. Paul spoke when he said:
The Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles, that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end. (cf 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)
Pay close attention: In just a handful of words, St. Paul (that is, Almighty God who inspired the text) is making a number of things perfectly clear.
1) Yes, it was “the Jews” who killed Christ. That they did so by coercing the Roman authorities to carry out their evil designs via the threat of civil unrest in no way absolves them of the actual deed.
2) The Jews of whom St. Paul writes are not just the enemies of Christ and His followers, but rather are they adversaries to all men.
3) How so? By doing what they might to prohibit the Church from carrying out her mission, teaching and baptizing, that men may be saved.
4) With these Jews, God is not pleased. And lest one imagine that this refers only to those Jews alive at the time, St. Paul makes it clear that the Divine wrath against such men endures even now and will to the end.
5) Though Christ the King has many enemies in this world, just one group in particular has been identified in the inspired word of God as the adversaries to all men.
To the extent that this particular passage may be leveraged to justify sinful behavior, hatred, or worse, far be it to place blame on the Catholic Church, and much less on the Divine Author.
Not even one among us has the authority to quibble with what the Scriptures plainly state. Ours is to acknowledge what it tells us, to give heed to it, and to allow the insight that it provides to inform our worldview.
What does it mean to be a “Jew” today?
At this, it is necessary to recall what St. Paul said in his Epistle to the Hebrews: With the New Testament now perfected in Christ, the Old Law is obsolete (cf Hebrews 8), which is why Pope St. Pius X stated we cannot concede the Jewish religion any further validity.
What then are we to make of those who today call themselves Jews, despite the fact that the Jewish religion of the Patriarchs has been superseded by the teachings of Christ, to quote Pope St. Pius X once more?
Our Lord spoke, twice no less, about the “Synagogue of Satan, those who say they are Jews but are not” (Apoc. 2:9, 3:9).
These words of Our Lord do not suggest that all who say they are Jews in our day are really just undercover operatives of the Evil One, simply claiming to be Jewish. Rather, we should understand that “they are not” is due to the fact that Judaism is no more.
NB: In our discussion of the Jewish supremacist Zionists, we do not intend to speak of all self-identified Jews considered either individually or collectively. On this note, one may have noticed that, as it concerns Israel’s attack on Iran, and likewise its genocide operation in Gaza, some of the Zionists’ harshest critics say they are Jews. It is for God alone to read the hearts of men, even as we discern the objective realities that are plainly within our sight.
More perspective in this regard can perhaps be gained by considering the events leading up to the Crucifixion of Christ.
In Jerusalem at that time, according to scholars, were an estimated 180,000 Jews, 150,000 of whom had traveled to the holy city for the Passover.
Joining “the chief priests and rulers and the people” (cf Luke 23) in calling for the death of Jesus was a crowd of persons that couldn’t possibly have numbered more than a small fraction of the total Jewish population. In fact, it is entirely likely that many of the Jews in Jerusalem at that time had very little knowledge of Our Lord. Fewer still were even aware of His trial before Pilate. As we read in the Gospels:
And when He was come into Jerusalem, the whole city was moved, saying: Who is this? And the people said: This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee. (Matthew 21:10-11)
The point is this: Our focus in this essay will be on the modern-day rulers and leaders of the Jews, the Zionists, that elite group of very wealthy and powerful Jewish supremacists.
While this would seem to exclude the vast majority of self-identified Jews – persons whose direct influence in temporal affairs, both locally and globally, is not unlike that of the average citizen and voter – there are certain attributes and attitudes that all of them share, chief among them is their rejection of Jesus Christ who said:
He who rejects me rejects Him who sent me. (Luke 10:16)
In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that the rejection of God, in Christ, is the solitary article of faith (if you will allow) that is shared by all who identify as Jewish today. (I am deliberately leaving out of consideration so-called “Messianic Jews,” persons who constitute a distinct breed of heretic.)
Jewish opposition to Christ manifests not only in what may be recognized as active opposition to the Church, but also, and more commonly, as a frontal assault on the objective moral order, e.g., widespread support for such things as abortion, homo-deviance, and globalism, which itself is promoted via such things as racial division, class warfare, the bogus climate crisis, etc.
The rejection of Our Lord and the promotion of an anti-Christian agenda is not, however, the exclusive franchise of the Jews. Indeed, they have many non-Jewish collaborators. In fact, today’s Jewish supremacist class needs these collaborators in order to achieve their ends, just as they did in securing the death of Christ.
There are many persons of varying identity who likewise reject and oppose Christ and His Kingship, and this includes no small number of baptized persons, some of whom are also numbered among the world’s powerful elite.
These nominal Christians and other non-Jews work in concert with the Jewish supremacists, thanks mainly, it seems, to overlapping interests (e.g., the pursuit of money, power, and prestige). It also seems to be that some influential non-Jews collaborate with the Zionists because they have been bribed (either directly or via campaign donations, political favors, sweetheart business deals, etc.), blackmailed, or threatened with physical harm and even death.
About the latter, one may immediately think of John F. Kennedy, who had insisted that the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs (predecessor to AIPAC, which gives huge amounts of money to American legislators) register as a foreign agent. More importantly perhaps, he was also staunchly opposed to Israel’s nuclear weapons aspirations.
Following Kennedy’s assassination, Lydon B. Johnson took office and swiftly reversed course on both fronts, from which you may draw your own conclusions.
With all of this said, let’s now get down to the business of considering the character of the men who act as today’s “leaders and teachers of the Jews,” the Zionist, Jewish supremacist class.
“Know thine enemy” (Sun Tzu, Art of War)
As noted, these are men whose self-understanding and worldview are deeply Talmudic, but that is not to say that they are necessarily well versed in the contents of the Talmud itself, much less are they properly considered Talmudic scholars.
Recall, however, what Rabbi Steinsaltz stated: In so many ways, we are Talmudic Jews, whether we believe in it or not.
In other words, the Talmudic ethos is engrained in the Jewish people at large, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of self-identified Jews have never studied the Talmud and are largely ignorant of its contents.
The Talmudic mindset is not made equally manifest in the behavior and attitudes of every individual Jew, far from it. It does, however, seem to permeate the Jewish supremacist class at all levels.
As noted, the Talmud places great importance on dwelling in the Holy Land as a central aspect of Jewish identity. It also, more importantly, directly engenders an attitude of supremacy among certain Jews.
How so?
By portraying non-Jews as subhuman.
“O seed of Abraham,” exclaims the Talmud, “The Lord has surely chosen you, as spoken by Ezekial; you are my sheepfold; I mean that you are men, whereas the other peoples of this world are not men, but beasts. (Treatise, Baba-Metsigna, f. 114.f.)
The Jew who insults a non-Jewish woman and assaults her is absolved of all judgment, because he has done evil “to a mare.” (Treatise, Barakout, f. 88. f.)
Maimonides, who is considered infallible in the ghettoes, in his treatise on homicide, in a sentence treating an Israelite who kills a goi, wrote that the Jew cannot be punished, precisely because the goi is not a Jew.
What else?
One of the authoritative Jewish books seriously asserts that “non-Jews are black animals”, who are also described as boars. (Salkutro-Ubéni, f. 10. 3.)
– Excerpt taken from La Civilta Cattolica, Vol. VII, no. XIV. 1890
This Talmudic view of non-Jews sheds light on Israel’s utter lack of compassion for the women and children of Gaza whom they have been systematically killing and deliberately starving for more than a year. The genocide in Gaza, however, is no isolated incident. The Zionists have been treating non-Jews in Palestine like cockroaches for more than seven decades.
Thus far, we have considered how the Talmud serves as a basis for both the Zionist quest for land, as well as the degree to which it gives rise to a supremacist attitude, one that justifies securing the services of non-Jews to achieve an end, much like a farmer making use of a beast of burden to plow his field.
“The Lord hates a lying tongue and hands that shed innocent blood” (cf Proverbs 6:16-17)
At present, with respect to Israel’s attack of Iran, President Trump has chosen to make Benjamin Netanyahu’s story his own, joining him in insisting that Iran was so close to obtaining a nuclear weapon that Israel’s attack was entirely justified.
Even so, it seems that most Americans are finally coming to terms with the degree to which the Jewish supremacist class, the Zionist leaders, simply cannot be trusted, their words – whether merely spoken or solemnly sworn – are utterly worthless. In fact, many have concluded, and not without reason, that it is best to assume deception when a Zionist speaks until proven otherwise.
Surely, the Jewish supremacist class and their Shabbos goys in government, academia, and media would call the presumption of dishonesty anti-Semitic, but deceptiveness happens to be a hallmark of the Talmudist ethos.
Kol Nidre: “All vows”
Consider that religious, and even many marginally religious Jews, enter the synagogue annually on the allegedly holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, to recite (chant, actually) what is called the Kol Nidre, Aramaic for “all vows.”
The prayer reads as follows in English:
All vows, and prohibitions, and oaths, and consecrations, and bans, and terms, and obligations that we vow, and swear, and devote, and prohibit upon ourselves – from this Yom Kippur until the next Yom Kippur, may it come upon us for good – regarding all of them, we regret them.
Let all of them be annulled, canceled, voided, and nullified. Let them not be valid or binding. Our vows are not vows; our prohibitions are not prohibitions; our oaths are not oaths.
Can you, dear reader, imagine for even a moment coming to Holy Mass on Easter Sunday and chanting these despicable words, dictating such evil terms to Almighty God Himself?
At this, an important note is necessary.
The tune to which the Kol Nidre is chanted became the standard intonation more than five centuries ago. It is very familiar to many Jews, even those who have had only limited exposure to the Yom Kippur service during their lives.
Music, as most persons can attest, can have a very powerful emotional effect on people. That is certainly the case with respect to the Kol Nidre chant, which occupies a nostalgic and privileged place in the hearts of many Jews.
In addition to the tune, however, even many non-religious Jews are familiar enough with the words, whether Aramaic or Hebrew, to chant along and they look forward to doing so on Yom Kippur. And yet, among them, many (if not most) have little idea as to what they are actually saying.
Even among those who are able to phonetically voice the sounds of several traditional Hebrew prayers, very few have a solid enough grasp of the language to produce a meaningful translation. At best, some have just a general idea of the gist of a given synagogue prayer and its purpose.
This may come as a surprise to readers who have had only limited personal interactions with Jews, but the fact is that the overwhelming majority of self-identified Jews the world over, and most certainly in the United States, are almost entirely secular.
Many never enter the synagogue at all, others, only on the “High Holy Days.” A large number of those that do go to “shul” more frequently than that, do so as much, or more, for a cultural experience than a religious one.
In any case, for obvious reasons, the Kol Nidre, once its meaning became known to non-Jews, has been a source of controversy for centuries. And just as one might expect from a people who have the audacity to knowingly make such a declaration before God, many lies have been told in order to downplay its importance.
One of the lies most often told to justify the Kol Nidre is that it came about in response to the forced conversions that were carried out during the Spanish Inquisition, which began in 1478.
In addition to the fact that this story doesn’t explain why it is prayed even now, given that the Jews are nowhere being forced to convert, it ends up that the prayer itself, and the attitude that it expresses, is many centuries older. More on that in a moment.
In any event, this poor attempt at an excuse is a version of the much more widespread perpetual Jewish victimhood fable, which is used with impunity by the Zionist Jewish supremacists to further their agenda.
Another very common cover story is to dismiss the Kol Nidre’s importance by saying that it’s not really a prayer at all, but rather “a dry legal” formula, a cut-n-paste claim that appears in hundreds of Jewish books and websites verbatim.
This too is a blatant lie.
While the Kol Nidre is most often prayed in Aramaic, a Hebrew version is also prayed in some places, and it includes the phrase:
… we announce before our father in heaven that if we vowed a vow, there is no vow…
Add to this the fact that the Kol Nidre is invoked just once a year in the synagogue, on the holiest of days, and not just by individuals, but rather by the entire community gathered with their rabbi, in the presence of the Torah scrolls. To suggest that it is anything other than prayer is so disingenuous as to make one laugh.
With this in mind, how confident can anyone be that Benjamin Netanyahu (or any other member of the Jewish supremacist class) is a sincere negotiator, that he is being truthful when he enters into an agreement (e.g., a cease fire), or when he speaks about the specter of Iranian nuclear weapons, or when he insists that he and his government were totally taken by surprise by the events of October 7, 2023, or anything else that might roll off his forked tongue?
So, from where did the vile ideas expressed in the Kol Nidre prayer originate?
By now, I suspect you know the answer: The Talmud.
One who desires that his vows not be upheld for the entire year should stand up on Rosh HaShana and say: Any vow that I take in the future should be void. And this statement is effective, provided that he remembers at the time of the vow that his intent at the beginning of the year was to render it void. (Nedarim 23b)
In other words, as long as the vow maker remembers (secretly, obviously) that he made his intent known at the beginning of the year to render his vows worthless, he has no obligation to uphold his pledge.
At this, it should be clear why Sacred Scripture refers to “those who say they are Jews but are not” as the “Synagogue of Satan,” the Master Deceiver and Father of Lies.
Conclusion
Bringing the discussion back to where we began: The world is presently attempting to digest Israel’s attack on Iran, why it happened, and more importantly, how it might escalate.
– Jewish supremacy and the Zionists’ alignment with the Devil is why it happened.
– This also happens to be why Gaza is happening.
– Moreover, this is why the Holy Land, where Muslims, Christians, and Jews once lived in harmony, has become a hell hole.
As for the present situation escalating, it seems that the United States is the wild card.
Unfortunately, President Trump and his closest advisors are heretics who, at best, have fallen for the Zionists’ lies. It seems that some of these fools genuinely believe that supporting the modern terrorist state of Israel is a Biblical imperative.
Specifically, they believe that God’s promise to Abram: “I will make of thee a great nation … I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee” (cf Genesis 12:2-3) applies to the modern terrorist state of Israel and the Talmudist movement that sustains it.
As for Trump himself, while he seems to be among those who embrace this grave error, it is also the case that he sold his presidency, if not his soul, to wealthy Jewish supremacists, having received $100 million from the Zionist, Miriam Adelson, alone.
Even the most committed members of the MAGA cult are coming to realize that the Zionists own Donald Trump by virtue of whatever commitments he may have made to them in the process of securing his 2024 election victory.
Those vows, however, are most certainly voidable, thanks be to God.
How exactly?
By conversion to the one true faith, the Holy Catholic Faith, and a worthy Confession.
Anything less and one shudders to think about what lies ahead.
