[UPDATE: In the years since this article was written, it has become increasingly clear to me that the society presently headquartered in Rome and calling itself the “Catholic Church” is but an imposter inasmuch as it teaches both doctrinal and moral error. Please bear this in mind as you read. – LV]
With the year 2017 marking the 100th anniversary of the Fatima apparitions, a countdown of sorts has begun in anticipation of a terrible chastisement of unthinkable proportions.
It is not without good reason that one shudders at the prospect.
On October 13, 1973, the anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima, Our Lady spoke the following words of warning to Sr. Agnes Sasagawa at Akita, Japan:
As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never have seen before. Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful. The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead.
In 1998, speaking at the International Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici Conference in Rome, Former Ambassador of the Phillipines to the Holy See, Howard Q. Dee said:
Cardinal Ratzinger personally confirmed to me that these two messages, of Fatima and Akita, are essentially the same.
While some question the authenticity of the Akita apparition, the important point for our purposes concerns Cardinal Ratzinger’s comments regarding the Third Secret of Fatima, the contents of which he was personally familiar. That revelation by the future Pope Benedict XVI predated his complicity in the cover-up operation of June 2000 wherein the Vatican allegedly published the Third Secret “in its entirety.”
All but the invincibly naïve know better and therefore have every reason to expect Our Lady’s warning as given at Akita to come to fruition; unless, of course, the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart is carried out according to her wishes beforehand.
The question is, however, when might one expect Our Lord to administer this act of justice in return for the popes’ failure to heed Our Lady’s wishes?
This brings us back to the 100 year countdown.
On July 13, 1917, Our Lady told the Fatima seers – Jacinta, Lucia and Fransisco that God, if people did not stop offending Him, would punish the world “by means of war, hunger and persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father;” with Russia serving as His chosen instrument of chastisement.
“Russia will be the instrument of chastisement chosen by Heaven to punish the whole world if we do not beforehand obtain the conversion of that poor nation,” Our Lady said.
“To prevent this,” the Blessed Virgin continued, “I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart,” and she promised that if only this solitary request be met, Russia would be converted and a period of peace would be given to the world.
As, again, all but the invincibly naïve know, as of this writing the requested consecration of Russia has not been done.
Our Lady forewarned of the consequences that would befall us should her simple request be ignored, saying:
Russia will spread its errors throughout the world, raising up wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer and various nations will be annihilated.
At this, a few observations are in order.
First, let’s talk about the idea that “the Holy Father will have much to suffer.”
Most observers, it seems, tend to place this warning on the same plane as that concerning martyrdom and that of Russia persecuting the Church; as if the Holy Father will be unjustly victimized.
I have a somewhat different view.
We know that Our Lady asked that the Third Secret be revealed in 1960 specifically in order to warn about the dangers of “a bad council and a bad Mass.” We also know that John XXIII chose a different path; one that his successors have also chosen to follow.
Let’s be honest, from the time of the Council on forward, the popes haven’t behaved in such way as to merit the martyrdom of those who steadfastly remain faithful even in the face of death.
On the contrary, they have failed to remain faithful, and as such they have invited much personal suffering, as a matter of justice, by virtue of their disobedience and for having misled countless innocent souls.
As we attempt to discern the signs of the times vis-à-vis the Fatima apparitions, this may be an important distinction; i.e., those who are looking for a faithful victim-pope are likely to be searching in vain.
This should make sense given the fact that a truly faithful pope would do as Our Lady asked; thus averting the dreadful consequences of which she forewarned.
“Russia will spread its errors throughout the world…”
We know very well that this entails the fomenting of wars and the persecution of the Church, but to specifically what “errors” is Our Lady referring?
In my view, two in particular merit close consideration; namely, the separation of Church and State and atheism.
NB: The dates on which these errors came to feature prominently in Russia – 1917 and 1929 specifically – are significant. Keep them in mind.
Just weeks after the final Fatima apparition, the “Great October Socialist Revolution” took place in Russia; setting in motion a torrent of severe anti-religious legislative activity that culminated in the 1929 Laws on Separation of Church and State.
Among the official acts set forth by the Russian government in the year 1917 are the following:
– Control of all parish schools, religious colleges and seminaries, along with all of their property, will be handed over to the Commissariat of Education.
– All records in the possession of religious organizations are to be handed over to the local courts.
– The Russian Republic from now on recognizes only civil marriages.
– All decisions concerning the dissolution of marriage belong solely to the court.
[NOTE: For a more detailed treatment of the topic, see Soviet anti-religious legislation – a Wikipedia article with numerous references.]
As these Acts (each of which was instituted in December 1917) make evident, steps were being taken in Russia to eliminate the Church’s influence immediately following the Fatima apparitions.
This, however, was just the beginning.
For a truly fascinating glimpse into the anti-religious scene in Russia following the 1929 Laws on Separation of Church and State, we will look to an article written in 1930 by Bishop Michel D’Herbigny, President of the Pontifical Institute of Oriental Studies, entitled: The “Anti-God Front” in Soviet Russia since April 1929.
[Note: Registration with Jstor may be necessary in order to read the article.]
Bishop D’Herbigny described the situation in Soviet Russia as follows:
In April 1929 the general assembly of the delegates of the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics revised several of the fundamental laws … Their publication and the events which have followed reveal a determination to suppress, once and for all and as soon as possible, every manifestation of religion-and even the existence of religion itself. (Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, Vol. 19, No. 73. Mar., 1930, pp. 1-10)
His Excellency went on to comment upon the lengths to which the Russian State would go to crack down on proselytism; not only in public, but in private as well.
The teaching of religion to children, in any place whatever, was already forbidden not only to clergymen but to any believer. Henceforth the parents themselves can be punished as guilty of religious propaganda if they induce their children to frequent the church or to learn and recite their prayers. (ibid.)
As the rights of parents and clergy were increasingly denied, the control exercised by government approved institutions grew:
At a general conference of the orphanages of Leningrad a director declared that to wait until the school age before weaning children from religion is to wait too long. They must be taken at the tenderest age and initiated immediately into irreligion. Unfortunately they are poisoned only too often by the religious atmosphere of the family. (ibid.)
The result?
The perversion of children has reached an incredible shamelessness. So revolting and diabolical are some of the details that they cannot be told here. (ibid.)
According to Bishop D’Herbigny’s assessment:
It is quite clear that we are on the eve of a new code of laws which will make all religion impossible … Every manifestation, in public or private, capable of inducing others to practice acts of religion will be considered [under the 1929 law] punishable propaganda. (ibid.)
The only form of propaganda allowed (and, in fact, encouraged) by the State, according to Bishop D’Herbigny, was that of anti-religion, or “Militant Atheism.”
The separation of Church and State and atheism…
These, my friends, are the very errors that, once spread, would create the ideal climate for the wars, persecutions of the Church, and martyrdom about which Our Lady forewarned.
Most of us, it seems, think of the warning, “Russia will spread its errors throughout the world…” in geo-political terms and with respect to the behavior and condition of individual States.
Certainly, the situation described by Bishop D’Herbigny is chilling in that it reads, in hindsight, like a forecast of things to come in places like the United States where I live. Indeed, I can tell you that certain of the godless activities he decried are already evident here, and the downward trajectory of the culture toward full blown irreligion is undeniable.
Even so, I would argue once more that those wishing to discern the signs of the times vis-à-vis the Fatima apparitions do well to look first and foremost to the Church and the degree to which Russia’s errors have taken hold therein.
As goes the Church, so goes the world.
This being so, Our Lady’s warning, “Russia will spread its errors throughout the world…” can be well understood to say that a time will come when the Church itself will become infected with said errors; thus relinquishing its proper role as the “soul” of human society and “man’s guide to heaven.” (cf Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei)
Indeed, Our Lady’s description of the consequences of the popes’ failure to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart can be understood as follows:
The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres…churches and altars sacked; the Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord. The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God. (Our Lady of Akita)
Recall that these words spoken to Sr. Agnes Sasagawa at Akita, Japan are, according to the future Pope Benedict XVI himself, “essentially the same” as the message of Fatima.
The question one might ask therefore is this:
As the 100th anniversary of the Fatima apparitions approaches, are the errors of Russia – specifically the separation of Church and State and atheism – evident in the Church today?
There can be no question that the Declaration on Religious Freedom of Vatican II (the “bad council” about which the still hidden portion of the Third Secret warns) amounts to the undoing of the immutable doctrine so beautifully illuminated in the Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas, on the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ; thus adopting in principal the separation of Church and State.
As a result, churchmen today no longer insist upon the Sovereign Rights of Christ the King; opting instead to plead with the State on behalf of everyone, believer and non-believer alike, and their supposed right to follow their individual consciences.
OK, fair enough, but surely it cannot be said that the Church is hurtling toward atheism!
Oh, really?
The pages of this blog are filled with evidence clearly demonstrating the degree to which modernism has taken hold in Rome; especially in the highest places.
For the sake of brevity, I will take this opportunity simply to remind readers of the wise words of Pope St. Pius X, who in his Encyclical, On the Doctrines of the Modernists, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, tells us precisely where modernism inevitably leads:
We shall see later how, with such theories, added to the other errors already mentioned, the way is opened wide for atheism. – Pope St. Pius X
No, Rome has not fully adopted the atheistic program detailed in Bishop D’Herbigny’s description of 1930 Russia, but the signs along the road that leads there are most certainly present for the reading.
Consider, for example, Francis’ vehement rejection of religious propagation, saying most recently:
“It’s not right to convince someone of your faith. Proselytism is the strongest venom against the path of ecumenism.”
Note well that the “ecumenism” to which he refers is nothing more than a joint effort to engage in earthbound good works that have humankind (not God) as their center and crown; a truly socialist activity.
Consider as well the degree to which Francis is pleased to undermine the rights of parents to form their children.
Commenting on Amoris Laetitia in an article for akaCatholic, Randy Engel wrote:
The main heading, “The Need for Sex Education,” is instructive in light of the fact that prior to the post-conciliar era, no such “instruction” was deemed “necessary” by Holy Mother Church apart from the natural instruction given by parents to their children on sexual matters as they enter womanhood and manhood.
The Vatican also recently crafted its own sex education program; one so “revolting and diabolical” in its own right that Bishop D’Herbigny would undoubtedly feel moved to cry out anew: The perversion of children has reached an incredible shamelessness!
Add to this the fact that Francis is laboring to effectively to reduce Christian marriage to little more than mere civil marriage, and one can hardly deny that the errors of Russia have spread in such way as to permeate the very hearts and minds of those who exercise ecclesial power in Rome!
This brings me back to where we began:
The 100 year countdown
On August 19, 1931, Our Blessed Lord appeared to Sr. Lucia at her convent in Rianjo, Spain to express His displeasure over the fact that Russia had not yet been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of His mother as requested:
Make it known to My ministers that, given they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution My command, they will follow him also into misfortune.
In this, Our Lord was referring to His request, made on June 17, 1689, that the King of France consecrate the nation to the Sacred Heart. This request was not met.
One hundred years to the day, on June 17, 1789, the King of France was stripped of his legislative authority by the Third Estate, and four years later the King was taken to the guillotine by the soldiers of the French Revolution.
Note well that the crime of the French Revolutionaries wasn’t so much the execution of an innocent man as it was the execution of one who met with great suffering due to his guilt before God.
One should expect a similar dynamic with respect to Our Lady’s warning that “the Holy Father will have much to suffer.”
Let’s return now the question at hand:
When is the 100th anniversary of the requested consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary; the date on which one may expect the chastisement described in some detail by Our Lady at Akita; along with the “misfortune” of the Kings of France befalling the pope?
Recall Our Lady’s words spoken on June 13, 1917 at Fatima:
“I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart…”
Come back, she did.
The date was June 13, 1929 when Our Lady appeared to Sr. Lucia and said:
The moment has come for God to ask the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart.
Two things should immediately stand out:
One, the request comes from God through the Blessed Virgin.
Secondly, for those who are counting down in anticipation of a terrible chastisement of unthinkable proportions, next year is not the target, but rather 2029; June 13 to be exact.
This is both good news and troubling news.
It is troubling to imagine that, barring the consecration of Russia as requested, the present situation in the Church and the world, for as bad as it is, will undoubtedly get much, much worse over the course of the next dozen or so years, and that is before the chastisement described by Our Lady is properly visited upon us.
The good news is that there’s still time.
So, what are we to do?
At Akita, Our Lady told us:
“Prayer, penance and courageous sacrifices can soften the Father’s anger … Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. With the Rosary, pray for the Pope, the bishops and priests … Pray very much the prayers of the Rosary. I alone am able still to save you from the calamities which approach. Those who place their confidence in me will be saved.
“Next year is not the target…” You are completely wrong about stating that the target year is June 2029. The reality is that, “The time will be shortened for the sake of the elect”. The nuclear war with Russia is imminent.
Let’s be honest, from the time of the Council on forward, the popes haven’t behaved in such way as to merit the martyrdom of those who steadfastly remain faithful even in the face of death.
2 days ago I finally came to the conclusions after reading many prophecies of our times that it MUST be Benedict. 2 popes prophecies, etc. In the past I always wondered how would a pope since Vatican 2 suddenly at the face of arrows being shot at him have a sudden conversion and suddenly be this AWESOME martyr. Yes, how? It’s like you slapped my face back into reality, Louie. Back to the drawing board. I think what you are saying is “The Pope will have much to suffer” is all these guys since Vatican 2??? I need some clarification in this area you’ve addressed. Are you saying they are their own suffering?
“I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart…”
Come back, she did.
“Shall” come to ask..bummer! and I was also hoping that this would all end next year. Deep down though I’ve always felt there’s a boat load of suffering yet to come, unfortunately before this is all over. I guess the next 11years or so will be our true test. Oh! Our children!
Rushintuit, at the same time something is definitely brewing with Russia with Putin demanding that all his citizens return home at once.
Dear Louie,
I can’t believe that I’m going to disagree with you. I personally believe that the 100 year anniversary is next year. When you see what Russia is currently preparing for and the saber rattling that they are doing and that we will probably have Killery as president, next year seems like the year that Our Good Lord will justly punish us. Either way, we will find out relatively soon.
PS Don’t forget to give us an update on your medical condition
Give Louie his due credit. Next year is the 90th Anniversary. The time has been shortened by 10 years for the sake of the elect.
2017 – 1917 = 100. Not sure how you come up with 90.
I guess you didn’t read Louie’s article. Louie starts counting at Our Lady’s official request for the Consecration of Russia on June 13, 1929. You really should read the article.
Very interesting theory, Mr. V.
There are several points I’d like to discuss with others regarding the subject matter, and I’m wondering why no one uses the forums anymore? I have many questions I’d love answered by you or some of your knowledgeable readers.
My speculation:
The chastisement is two-fold. And other prophecies may shed light on events.
Indeed 2017 marks the 100th anniversary of Fatima since it’s first day.
The coming war with Russia is likely something that could occur in 2017, alongside possibly other things like the Pope fleeing the Vatican and the Vision of the Bishop in White, The Russian flag raised over the Vatican etc.
The 2029 date could actually be because the 100 year time limit began when Mary came to formally request the Consecration, and it has been since then that the clock has been ticking akin to the request for France to be Consecrated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
The final chastisement, one greater than the deluge, is likely not referring to Nuclear war, but possibly an actual supernatural judgment, the same sort that Peter refers to as the 2nd judgment by fire akin to the flood of Noah, where God once used water, he will now use fire.
The actual clue that this may not have to do with nukes, is probably seen in the Miracle at Fatima where the Sun itself hurls itself towards the Earth. The people cry out in terror and beg forgiveness and repentance.
The final chastisement is not nuclear war (though that will indeed be part of the 3rd world war and the annihilation of nations), but finally one greater than the deluge, a supernatural one, one where the world will see that this is a divine miraculous act of God, not something attributable to human action.
The judgment of Fire St. Peter prophecies. Fire being fitting given the similar miraculous judgments of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Dennis, I’ll add an interesting item for you to ponder. Our Lady of the Rosary mentioned Pope Pius XI by name and in a negative context at Fatima, in 1917. Six days after the Lateran Treaty was ratified in June of 1929, Our Lady made the formal request for the Consecration of Russia. Google, “Bernardino Nogara” to see how this implicated Pius XI with WWII and the Message of Fatima.
I have tried, but do not know how to use the forums, Dennis. I think that it is appropriate to discuss Fatima because the article is about that topic.
I think about Fatima many of my waking hours. And when I stop thinking about it, my sister reminds me to think about it some more.
–
What questions do you have?
Expect the Garabandal Miracle on 13 April 2017 and the Chastisement, also called the 3 days of darkness (3DoD) on the 100th anniversary of the Fatima miracle. The Warning is probably 2 February 2017 but less sure on that date. Rev 9 talks about 5 months of locusts, which is 5 centuries of Martin Luther. That is October 2017. WW3 with nukes starts anytime now. We will have the Fatima period of peace after the 3DoD. So 2017 is the year. Pope B16 is the bishop in white in the third secret of Fatima.
A friend of mine attended the Fatima Center’s conference (Fr. Gruner’s) this past spring 2016, and she said that the Fatima experts who spoke were in agreement with you, Louie, that the 100 years will be 2029. Perhaps you were even there as a speaker.
I ask this in all seriousness…..do you really believe that God’s coming wrath is centered around the vatican bank?
Incredible insight about the suffering pope. Thank you for that piece to the puzzle.
In the last 24 hours, I was having a discussion regarding just that topic. Who could be the “suffering pope?” Your wisdom is once again so helpful.
Thank you!
I do not want to provoke the ire of anyone here, but I have reservations about the Akita visions.
–
The image of Our Lady is standing in front of the crucifix, which has no corpus on it. It has “become affiliated with “Our Lady of All Nations” — so it says on wiki.
(Our Lady of All Nations is ecumenical in its look and message.)
How could Akita be compared to Fatima? I know Cardinal Ratzinger said “the message” can be compared with Fatima, but at Fatima, the sun danced in the sky for 10 minutes and then came hurdling down to earth in front of 70,000 people.
There is nothing comparable in the history of the world.
–
I have other concerns regarding Akita.
How could Our Lady appear in 1973 without mentioning a word about the Vatican 2 council and the New Mass?
Why (at Akita) did She not mention that Her 3rd Fatima secret which was to be revealed to all the world in 1960 was still withheld in 1973?
Our Lady of Akita said, “The devil WILL infiltrate even into the church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops.”
Why did She say “will infiltrate” when Vatican 2 had just closed in 1965, and the “smoke of satan” had already entered, according to Pope Paul VI?
If, as Cardinal Ratzinger said, the Akita and Fatima messages are “essentially the same,” then where is the part about the bad Mass and the evil council?
Has Akita been used to focus us only on the physical chastisement, to distract us from the spiritual, the “aggiornamento” of the council and the New Mass?
_
As Louie has said before, “All roads lead to Fatima.”
Those that that lead us elsewhere, I question.
“the Holy Father will have much to suffer.” Perhaps, Our Lady was referring to his time in eternity. Also, did Our Lady mean more than one “Holy Father”?
The dogma of the Faith and the Holy Mass was protected for 1965 years, what changed? By introducing massive financial corruption in 1929, Pope Pius XI opened the door to the enemies of the Church. How could the Holy Ghost remain at the Vatican under these circumstances? “You cannot serve God and mammon”.
Thank you, Servant, but too much for a comment section. First chance you get, have someone show you how to use the forum. It’s not difficult, believe me – if I can figure it out! 😉
“If, as Cardinal Ratzinger said, the Akita and Fatima messages are “essentially the same,” then where is the part about the bad Mass and the evil council?”
Why would Cardinal Ratzinger reveal the part of the Secret that the Modernists have spared no effort to conceal? Do you really think that he would betray his fellow Modernists? It was perfectly safe for the Cardinal to speak of pie in the sky chastisements.
Cardinal Ratzinger told the truth about Akita and Fatima being essentially the same as regards the imminent material punishment. But don’t be so naive as to think that the good Cardinal would betray his brethren. As Pope, Ratzinger hinted that there was more to the Fatima Message. For that alone, he had to resign, but at least they let him live.
The third secred we know was contained in two envelopes. Part A and an addendum or Part B or as Antonio Socci calls it “the Fourth secret of Fatima”. Below is Part A. This was released in Nuewes Europa back in the 50’s with extra padding (more adjectives, decriptives, etc). This was read on air to the late Fr. Malachi Martin on the Art Bell show and he said it was “not the text” but that there were “elements of the real third secret”. That was the conformation that this below text is accurate. Cardinal Ottaviani apparently helped point out the parts of the Nuewes Europa text which was the “padding”. Therefore no vow was broken by revealing the 3rd secret.
“A great chastisement will fall on the entire human race; not today as yet, not tomorrow, but in the second half of the twentieth century.
No longer does order reign anywhere and Satan will reign over the highest places directing the course of events. He (Satan) really will succeed in infiltrating to the top of the Church. Also for the Church a time of Her greatest trials will come. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals; Bishops will oppose Bishops and Satan will march amid their ranks, and in Rome there will be changes. What is rotten will fall, and what will fall will never rise again. The Church will be darkened and the world deranged by terror.
A great war will break out within the second half of the Twentieth Century, fire and smoke will fall from Heaven, the water of the oceans will become vapors and the foam will rise up flooding and sinking everything, millions and millions of people will die by the hour and the survivors will envy the dead.
Death will reign everywhere for the errors committed by the foolish and by the partisans of Satan, who, then and only then, will reign over the world. At last, those who will survive all of these events will once more proclaim God and His Glory and serve Him like before, when the world was not as corrupted.”
Someone inevitably points out that we’re no longer in the 20th century, that’s attributed to our Lady holding back the arm of her son. this message closely matches the message of Akita.
Thanks for pointing out June 13th, suffice it to say, the “3rd Secret” released by the Vatican was balderdash.
Yes, Rushintuit, I agree that the 3rd secret of Fatima has been deliberately concealed and that Cardinal Ratzinger helped to conceal it, for whatever reason. I see that corruption began in 1929. “By introducing massive financial corruption in 1929, Pope Pius XI opened the door to the enemies of the Church.” You have given me insight here as to when the infiltration began and that Pope Pius XI was mentioned by name by Our Lady. Interesting, indeed.
–
But is it conceivable that Our Lady would give a message at Akita in 1973 without mentioning what had just occurred in Rome from 1962-1965? (Vatican 2?)
And without mentioning the “Paul VI Mass” which had just been promulgated in 1969, 4 years prior to Her message at Akita?
My point is, how could Akita be trusted if Our Lady, in speaking at Akita, was silent on the most important happenings in the Catholic Church.
How could She (at Akita) just speak about material chastisements?
Remember, at Lucia of Fatima said to Fr. Fuentes in 1957, “God is giving two last remedies to the world: the Holy Rosary and devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.”
Where is the Immaculate Heart of Mary in the statue of Akita?
Where in that message is mentioned devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary?
Lucia was told by Our Lady that she (Lucia) was to stay on earth (unlike Jacinta and Francisco) in order to promote devotion to “My Immaculate Heart.” If this was one of the two last remedies give to the world, then why was it not mentioned at Akita?
What do you think?
Well, that sounds almost exactly like the Akita message.
I will have to re-think my Akita position.
Why did the Akita message leave this part out?:
“He (Satan) really will succeed in infiltrating to the top of the Church.”
–
Did someone edit that out?
–
And why did Akita have a message that said the devil “will infiltrate” the church as if it were an event yet to come? Vatican 2 had just happened from 1962-1965 and the New Mass in 1969?
I don’t understand why Our Lady would speak at Akita in 1973, as if all this evil were yet to come, yet to infiltrate? Hadn’t we just been witness to the hijacking of the Church by the modernists at Vatican 2? The Mass of the Ages just been suppressed in 1969? It’s 1973, when She is speaking at Akita.
Why does this not add up to me?
That message was given to Lucia in 1917, she apparently wrote it down later at the suggestion of her bishop and it was to be released to the people, not the Pope or bishops, to the people in 1960 because “everythinig would be more clear then”.
What’s more, a journal entry from St. Lucia was released just a couple of years back, she wrote this down apparently in 1944.
““I felt my spirit inundated by a mystery of light that is God and in Him I saw and heard: the point of a lance like a flame that is detached, touches the axis of the earth, and it trembles: mountains, cities, towns and villages with their inhabitants are buried. The sea, the rivers, the clouds, exceed their boundaries, inundating and dragging with them, in a vortex, houses and people in a number that cannot be counted. It is the purification of the world from the sin in which it is immersed. Hatred, ambition, provoke the destructive war. After I felt my racing heart, in my spirit a soft voice said: ‘In time, one faith, one baptism, one Church, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic. In eternity, Heaven!’ This word ‘Heaven’ filled my heart with peace and happiness in such a way that, almost without being aware of it, I kept repeating to myself for a long time: Heaven, Heaven.” “
So basically, fire from heaven, a comet as other prophecies have said, the seas and rivers rise up flooding and carrying away everything. Check out some of the pictures of the Fukishima Tsunami if you want a vision of that.
Or was it Cardinal Siri of whom it was said was elected as much as three times as pope – ’58, ’63 & ’78 – and was denied by the ecclesial and jewish freemasons?
How could it be that Russia is chosen by God to punish the world when Holy Mother Russia was the source of all these errors. It could only mean that Russia has recovered from that affliction of Bolshevist Communism/Atheism whereas jolly old USA (and the western world) has become the Communist state par excellence. Sister Lucia said that Russia would punish the USA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO21mDHFY98&list=PLaEUCyXgZOLzehV8OQ9uUtPf4o_7S33An&index=1
This is a series of three sermons by a faithful FSSP priest who connects the dots.
“the errors of Russia are abroad” and they are. Russia was the instrument of chastisement. McCarthy was mocked and scorned for “McCarthyism”. When after the fall of the Soviet Union they released documents it turns out McCarthy was right, not only that, it was much WORSE than what he had said.
The consecration still has to be made and it will be made “late but not too late”. and it will be “accepted by heaven.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az4dzdS79jU
The answer is simple.
God tasked the responsibility of revealing the 3rd Secret to the Pope and the Church.
He obviously wanted it this way for a reason, otherwise He would’ve just told Sr. Lucia to reveal it herself.
There must be a reason. The chastisements on the other hand are as even Cardinal Ratzinger put it, things already revealed in Revelation and Prophecy and the End Times. So Mary at Akita is just developing on that.
As for why the Pope and the Church must themselves specifically do this? The reasons are simple –
– The message is promulgated from authority. People are more likely to take seriously what the Pope says than a visionary/mystic.
– The message is for the whole world, and God is signalling where He is speaking from The Papacy and the Catholic Church whom He alone has given authority.
– The message, likely is also a test of His own Vicars. And likely has something to do with the Office of the Papacy itself. Hence why John XXIII said, “This does no concern my pontificate.” And also why other prophecies have made claims such something that threatens the office of the Papacy, the Church itself of apostasy and that Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the AntiChrist. Such serious things must therefore be made from authority, otherwise coming from anyone else they’ll be ignored and slandered.
– God again is testing the Papacy, and as such He will not be mocked. If He wants the Pope to do it, then by the Pope it will be done. God isn’t changing His plans. And as we’ve seen the one who will do it and consecrate Russia as promised, but late, will therefore be a ‘mea culpa’ moment and that will be a Pope who repents for the actions of his predecessors, and the whole Church itself will do penance for it.
– There is precedent in the Bible for this method. One of the Kings of Judah (I can’t recall who), after corruption had overtaken the nation, had finally brought before him the Books of the Law, and seeing how grievously the people and previous rulers had violated the commandments, he was grieved and undertook repentance and reform. Given the precedent for Typology then and now, it is likely a faithful Pope will emerge who will read the Secret and be so moved by it that he will act and be the one to bring about true reform.
– When all this is done, if there exists confusion over who is the Pope, by these actions we will be able to identify and know the true Pope: The One who reveals that Secret and Consecrates Russia. Know him as the one and set aside all others, to quote of all things, the Gita.
That’s because we have no certain idea of what the ‘devil’s infiltration’ means. What extent? Is it only referring to those men infected by modernism? Or is it directly referring to outright possession? There is a distinction.
Vatican II, while of course always under the influence of evil, may not be attributable to the same extent as the infiltration our Lady of Akita might be referring to. Even here as before Our Lady is not being specific, probably for good reason. It is merely a warning given for mankind who generally can do nothing about it otehr than perfect themselves in preparation.
Yes. I have listened to theses excellent talks.
I think it’s important to remember that Our Lord gave the Popes a unique commission when He solemnly told St Peter, “Confirm thy brethren”. There is a Hierarchy in the Church. God wills that the Pope take the lead on matters of faith and morals.
It’s also important to remember that Our Lady allowed Lucia to make a key sentence of the Third Secret known to us: “In Portugal, the dogma of the faith, will always be preserved”. From that one sentence we can deduce that there will be a terrible crisis of faith throughout the entire world.
Our Lady wanted the Third Secret to be made public by the Pope in 1960. If the Secret had been made known in 1960, the Vatican Council would have been stopped. The Pope had the free will to obey and he refused.
The Council happened and the dogma of the faith was unraveling. Akita took place in 1973. The damage was done and God let the Church suffer the results of the Pope’s disobedience. Our Lady was not obligated to repeat at Akita, what she already warned about at Fatima regarding the crisis of faith in the Church.
Thats a fair answer. Thanks.
Wow, Johnno. Thank you so much for taking the time to spell this out so clearly.
May God bless you and reward you!
Ahhh…
Your distinction makes sense, Johnno.
That does make sense.
Thank you so much, Rushintuit.
This was a PRIVATE revelation??
Video (Oct.13, 1917) from actual photos – 5 minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBIs8cuIwTo
Please allow me to interject some info from another source regarding the possible timing of the chastisement.
There are many prophets beginning in the 4th C (St. Nilus) and onward discussing the chastisement. The book “The Three Days of Darkness” by Yves Dupont summarizes prophecies from many saints and blessed regarding our time.
You can look these up on your own, and there are many. That said, the one prophecy I wish to bring to your attention is from a French nun, Sister Jeanne de la Royer (d.1799). It alludes to the chastisement occurring before 2020:
Woe ! Woe ! Woe to the last century !
Here is what God wanted to show me in his Light. I began looking in the light of God, the century which must begin in 1800; I saw by this light that judgment wasn’t there, and that it wouldn’t be the last century. I considered, thanks to the same light, the century of 1900, until the end, to see positively if it would be the last. Our Lord made me know, and at the same time made me doubt, if it would be at the end of the century of 1900, or in that of 2000. But what I saw, it is that if the judgment arrived in the century of 1900, it would come only towards the end, and that if the world exceeds this century, the first two decades of 2000 will not pass without the judgment intervening, as I saw it in the light of God.”
So if this is correct, that of course means before 2020. I will mention here too that Malachi’s prophetic descriptions of the popes is about at its end.
(Vie et Révélations de Sœur de la Nativité, Charles Genet, book IV, pp. 125-126)
http://motheofgod.com/threads/sr-jeanne-le-royer-sister-of-the-nativity.5019/
Lastly, just before his abdication, Pope Benedict XVI declared blessed the nun Elena Aiello (d. 1961) who reiterated the dire warnings of Akita.
http://www.mysticsofthechurch.com/2011/09/blessed-elena-aiello-mystic-stigmatic.html
How many bishops dressed in white will there be over the next 13 years who will give the ‘impression’ of being the Holy Father? Francis and Pope Benedict XVI will be rather old by then. I feel it in my bones that something is just on the horizon and it will involve Russia, which country was mention in the contezt of two wars in the revealed secrets to date. It is not a stretch to equate Russia and a third war in the unrevealed part of the Third Secret which speaks of half-ruined cities, etc.
“And we saw in an immense light that is God: “something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it” a Bishop dressed in White “we had the impression that it was the Holy Father”….
Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions.”
We need the Blessed Virgin Mary now more than ever!!!
Mary is the New Ark of the Covenant!!! watch this awesome video!!! which proves it!! https://youtu.be/tNV2KGQATSs
video is for children and adults alike!!
We need the Blessed Virgin Mary now more than ever!!!
Mary is the New Ark of the Covenant!!! watch this awesome video!!! which proves it!! https://youtu.be/tNV2KGQATSs
Just watched it. Absolutely beautiful.
I will pass this along to many.
Thank you.
One of your best articles Louie.
This may be wrong of me, but I am personally thinking and have been sort of hoping for 2017. I shudder to think of the continual descent into madness for another 12 years. I’m of the mind that if its gonna come, let it come.
How many here are not longing for the inevitable Triumph of the Immaculate Heart? If it can only come on the other side of the Chastisement, then sobeit. And let’s face it…there’ll be no proper consecration by the current pope/hierarchy until fire is falling from the sky, etc.
So if it must come, sobeit. John 13:27.
In the end, it’s up to the Good Lord.
When the Church gets desperate enough, it will consecrate Russia properly:
https://thefivebeasts.wordpress.com/2016/10/06/fr-gabriele-amorth-and-the-consecration-of-russia/
Good post. Also read the message of Alois Irlmaier, he was a faithfuul Catholic, he is not a saint nor are his messages approved by the Church. He just had “freely given gifts” as the late Fr. Malachci Martin termed people who can prophecy or have other gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Yep, read that one too. I want to make a correction on my last post. Yves Du Pont wrote “Catholic Prophecy: The Coming Chastisement”, while Albert Hebert wrote “The Three Days of Darkness”. Both books cover similar ground. Du Pont’s book is interesting because it covers these prophecies through the lens of the early 70’s. The Vatican II results were just then beginning to unravel the Church.
An excellent find. There are many prophecies about today. BTW, Francis cannot be Peter the Roman mentioned by St. Malachy because Peter the Roman feeds his flock while Francis starves it of Truth. There is a real pope after Benedict XVI.
I like Yves Dupont’s book, though some have criticized his use of ellipses saying that he pieces together different prophecies From Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich which are not related. There is some true to that but I don’t think he’s misleads and one certainly can’t condemn the work because he did it. Interestingly, right when bergoglio came on the scene (“Thank you for coming all the way to the end of the earth to find me”..uh wasn’t hard find you Horhay, you were lobbying behind the scenes with your corruptniks for years for the job) Tan books pulled the plug on “Catholic Prophecy” and physical copies went up to $500 or $600 on Amazon. Luckily it’s available in pdf for free.
You might also read “Trial tribulation, and Triumph”. i really enjoy the book even though he pretends LaSalette is not a valid apparition simply due to people in the vatican who didn’t like the message of LaSalette and put part of it on the index.
You might also enjoy “We are warned”, the prophecies of Marie Julie Jahenny though the person who compiled these prohecies and translated into English has some odd ideas on a few things (IMO). Still a great resource from the French perspective and Marie Julie is an amazing saint, her time is coming.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/74402052/We-Are-Warned-The-Prophecies-of-Marie-Julie-Jahenny
“Note well that the crime of the French Revolutionaries wasn’t so much the execution of an innocent man as it was the execution of one who met with great suffering due to his guilt before God.”
I would like some clarification on this. Louis XVI was a martyr for the faith and will be declared a saint one day officially by the Church. As far as his “guilt” we don’t know what that is. We do know the faithless Jesuits were to have instructed the Sun King Louis XIV in the making of the consecration and that they suppressed the consecration. Louis XVI paid the price obviously but we don’t know if he even knew he was to make the consecration or when he found out he was to make the consecration. Some said he made the consecration while in prison, some sources say this is false. But regardless, Louis XVI was by all descriptions a fair, honest, and simple man. He was a saint and martyr for the faith, an innocent victim.
I have also read Du Pont’s book online, and I continue to read Jahenny. One of the most interesting prophecies in her book, published in about 1900 (?) was the creation of a ‘New Mass’, and words that were odious in the sight of the Lord to be used in it.
There is another point I would like to discuss here. There is a lot of speculation about “100 years” from this or that date. There is nothing I have seen so far to back any of this up regarding this 100 years premise.
There is no prophetic utterance from anyone I have heard of (i.e.; a prophet or a saint) to even make this an issue. My PERSONAL feeling is that since 2017 is the 100th Anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun — THEE Seminal moment of Fatima, and in light of Royer’s prophecy of a chastisement BEFORE 2020, then we need to do be prepared as never before.
How to be prepared is a lengthy topic, so I’ll leave it to others to study the Fatima message and find elsewhere the preparations to be made for the 3 days of darkness.
Not Peter the Roman — agreed. How about Pope “AM I NOT MERCIFUL?” Commodus, er, Francis?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGVIwRLC3bQ
Just a bit of shameless self-promotion here. But covered a phenomenon that starts next month, November 20th, the day that the Year of Grace ends. It’s basically going to be a nine-and-a-half-month period where Virgo is about to become pregnant with Jupiter, and when she finally gives birth, she’ll be wearing a crown of 12 stars on her head, whilst being crowned by the sun and standing on the moon. This interstellar 9.5-month conjunction will end on the Jewish Feast of the Trumpets–three weeks before the 100th Anniversary of Fatima.
In other words, we’re about to see the Lady of Revelations.
http://thehirschfiles.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-woman-of-revelations-begins-at-end.html
*Bah. I meant “Year of Mercy.” I’m tired.
It’s guesswork folks. And saying that something is going to happen at some future date makes the writer a hostage to fortune.
To complicate things further, it is said that having said Mass on 13th October 1884, Pope Leo XIII overheard two voices arguing at the Tabernacle of the church where he had just said Mass.
One guttural voice boasted “I can destroy your church”
Our Lord is said to have replied “Go ahead and do so”
The guttural voice replied “To do so I need more time and more power”
“How much time? How much power?”
Satan: “75 to 100 years, and a greater power over those who will give themselves over to my service.”
Our Lord: “You have the time, you will have the power. Do with them what you will.”
33 years later to the day, on 13th October 1917, Our Lady made her final apparition at Fatima.
I am concerned with all these guesstimates concerning the fulfillment of prophesies
that Satan has had 132 years (since 1884) to reveal the anti-Christ’s appointed one.
Alternatively, Satan has had 99 years (since 1917) to reveal the anti-Christ’s appointed one.
Now year 2029 is being out forward as an alternative timeline. If 2029 timeline is credible we’re 87 years along 1917 time line now, or we’re 132 years along 1884 time line now.
So in summary we don’t know for sure which time line applies. And it would seem that Satan isn’t aware of the timeline either because the his appointed one has not made an appearance in conformance with either suggested timeline.
Satan expired his years. That is some extra time, that God delays his justice. It could happen anytime since May 2016, Fr Amorth even said November 2015. It is said BEFORE not AT the end of century. Malachi Martin said, we don’t have 20 years more (interview 1997).
Russia just being a punishment? Or savior? M.Martin said, Russia and Kiev chosen by God for salvation, as Israel (interview 1996). Kiev – Lavra monastery.
Russia has contact with Extraterrestrials. Check youtube Medvedev Aliens. Perhaps they will wipe out the West with unknown weapons without the brute nuclear destruction.
Unless the West brings its own Alien friends. That could be expected by Hilary, as she said would go to Area 51 and dig in to the bottom.
Our problem is who will save us. Our Lady, but how. Directly with Angelic intervention and chariots of Ezekiel and Elijah? (should we call it ET too). Or indirectly thru the hands of the Russians and their superb underground facilities (5000 new bunkers only in Moscow). Or some other way, of God-protected cities on earth? Will America save the faithful? The West shows how little it is concerned of the people’s problems, 3 decades after the end of the bad communism.
Great Warning should be expected anytime now, before the end of February. Miracle = April 13, 2017 the only date. Chastisement, IMO before July 13 when Our Lady gave the Third Secret.
End times? Or just Chastisement? IDK. Nobody does. If we are secure on angelic spaceships, they will tell us whether it was the rapture or just temporal rescue from earth. Whether the bad guys below were the final antichrist and his aides, or just very bad guys. Indeed not all elements of Revelation are fulfilled literally. As of the Trumps falling mountain etc. But they could, as part of the Chastisement. Conchita of Garabandal said, the Chastisement is worse than fire above and fire below, enveloped with fire. If Chastisement is worse than fire, then it could be only the reign of the antichrist. How about first alien invasion of evil hostile ET (to be discerned from the Angelic ET), who will control the earth for months, years, during the antichrist reign? Being “eaten” by aliens would be the fast death of the body, and as many insiders speak on that, they don’t see any reason the aliens to eat such polluted bodies, not even those of them who eat flesh, such as the Draconians. Spiritual reign is far more dangerous.
One of the biggest problems the devote christians will encounter, they may fail to recognize God’s Angelic (ET) forces when they appear with flying devices. We need the devices not the angels, not Virgin Mary not God. We humans need how to be transported without dying first. By rejecting God’s help and messengers, those devote but uninformed faithful will have to face the others, the really evil aliens coming next.
There is much to say about the 144,000, the manchild, the Petrus Romanus and what happens after him with the Church that may spread to the four corners to the Universe. But I can’t say everything ina comment. We need new approach, new understanding based on all available as ideas and facts, and need to stop paying tribute to taboos of Galileo time.
Many saints through the ages talk about a future “comet” (astroid?) which will come in chastisement. Some associate it with the “3 days of darkness”.
I do know that the late Fr Malachi Martin said that at the Vatican they take very seriously an admonition “keep eyes on the skies” and the Vatican spent a large amount of money to horn in on the University of Arizona’s Observatory on Mt Graham (despite an unsuccessful lawsuit by the Native Americans not to build on this protected and sensitive conservation area; it is an ancient sacred ground which was guaranteed them by the US Government). Why? They are looking earnestly for something, possibly to have warning when the prophecied comet / astroid appears; despite that if it approaches earth from he direction of the sun, there will be scant time for warning when it does appear. The Vatican takes prophecy seriously, though they do not advertise that.
In 1973 Pope Benedict XVI was yet to be coerced into the appearance of resigning the papacy. The evil Masonic “St Gallen Mafia” was yet to plot the election of Bergoglio (“The NWO dream-pope”) as anti-pope, who would advocate heresy, condone idolatry in The Vatican, betray the Chinese Catholic Church to their evil Communist government; and who would prepare through the Abu Dabi accord for the a UN- approved “One World Religion”. Look up on U-tube Fr Malachi Martin’s prophetic interview by Art Bell, “Satan and an apostate Pope” and see if his description is an eerily frightening portrait of Pope Francis.