Here in the U.S., evidence tampering is a felony defined by statute as knowingly altering, destroying, mutilating, concealing, covering up, or making a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence…
Those found guilty of evidence tampering face up to 20 years in federal prison. It’s treated as a serious crime in every other nation on earth as well and for good reason; it’s a grave offense against justice.
In Catholic terms, the moral virtue of justice entails the rendering unto others what they are due, beginning, of course, with Almighty God and extending to one’s neighbor. Among men, this includes not only such things as goods or services, but also reputation.
Knowingly and deliberately offending against justice does grave harm to the moral order established by God, which brings me back to the matter of evidence tampering at the Unholy See.
Whatever your level of distrust happens to be concerning the relative integrity of the men presently in occupation of the Vatican, after reading this article, you may well decide that it doesn’t run deeply enough.
A friend just informed me that he recently had cause to cite the infamous prayer uttered by John Paul the Great Ecumenist in Jordan in the year 2000, pleading, “May Saint John Baptist protect Islam.”
I’m certain that nearly every reader of this space is familiar with it. Documentation of that blasphemous prayer has been readily available on the Unholy See website for more than a quarter century, but upon searching for it, my friend discovered that the text has been, shall we say, edited.
That is to say, the text of the prayer has been knowingly altered, concealed, and covered up, a false entry having been inserted in the record such that the text now reads: “May Saint John Baptist protect this land.”
Further investigation indicates that the change was made at some point after mid-October 2025, i.e., it happened on Leo’s watch.
An archived version of the original text is available HERE.
Better still, as I write, a video remains accessible on YouTube documenting the actual event wherein Wojtyla, speaking in English, plainly says, “May Saint John Baptist protect Islam…” NB: This isn’t a case of faulty interpretation.
It is reasonable to assume that the charlatans who went to the trouble of altering the text on the Unholy See website would like to eliminate the video evidence as well. But worry not, I’ve downloaded it for safe keeping.
In the meantime, here is the video cued up at the operative moment.
As most readers are aware, Leo just made his own overtures to Islam, on Monday, removing his shoes and entering the Grand Mosque of Algiers where he offered silent prayer.
This event caused no small amount of scandal among faithful Catholics. In response – with JPII’s blasphemous prayer in mind – my friend rightly pointed out that Leo is simply following in the footsteps of an alleged “saint.” It was then that he discovered that the evidence has been tampered with.
Now one is left to wonder what prompted the Vatican to attempt the clumsy cover up of a blasphemy that has long been well known. It’s odd, to say the least. Even so, several conclusions seem rather certain:
The decision to tamper with the evidence in this case was made in recognition of the fact that “sainthood” as the Holy Roman Catholic Church understands it and prayers for the protection of Islam are utterly incompatible.
In other words, the record was falsified to unjustly enhance the reputations of the men who hold, or held, high office in the Occupied Vatican. This starts with John Paul II, of course, but it extends to everyone involved in his cause, most especially Benedict XVI and Francis, and it includes even Leo XIV and others who routinely invoke the dubious “Saint” despite being fully aware of his blatant religious indifferentism.
But wait, there’s more…
Not only can we say with confidence that the record was knowingly altered in order to bolster the reputation of all concerned, it was also an admission of guilt.
You see, evidence tampering is always an admission of guilt. It is a crime in itself, yes, but it’s an additional crime, one that serves to prove the perpetrators guilt regarding the underlying offense, the one they sought to cover up.
Guilt in this case is shared by many but know this:
The most grave underlying crime concerns far more than simply the bogus canonization of John Paul II. The evidence tampering under discussion is a tacit admission that the conciliar enterprise presently in occupation of the Vatican is not the Holy Roman Catholic Church, rather, it is an imposter that thrives on a stolen identity.
