Home Forum All Things Catholic SSPX APPEAL TO BISHOP MARCELLO SEMERARO TO ENDORSE VATICAN COUNCIL II

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Lionel Andrades 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5193

    SSPX APPEAL TO BISHOP MARCELLO SEMERARO TO ENDORSE VATICAN COUNCIL II WITHOUT THE FALSE PREMISE FOR AN AGREEMENT

    The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) could announce that they accept Vatican Council II,without the premise( see Section A) and call upon Bishop Marcello Semeraro,the bishop of Albano, to do the same ( see Section B). Then the SSPX announces that after the bishop of Albano has accepted Vatican Council without the premise( Section C) they will accept the Council as such( Section C).

    A.

    The Society of St.Pius X accepts extra ecclesiam nulla salus without any exceptions as mentioned in the General Chapter Statement 2012 so they endorse Vatican Council II without the irrational premise.

    SSPX Accepts

    1.We (SSPX) accept Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need faith and baptism for salvation and so affirms the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. We call upon Bishop Marcello Semeraro, the Bishop of Albano to do the same. Affirm Vatican Council II.
    2.We accept Vatican Council II in which LG 8,LG 14, LG 16,NA 2,UR 3 are possibilities and do not refer to explicit exceptions to Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II. We call upon Bishop Semeraro to please do the same. Affirm Vatican Council II as we interpret it.
    Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Vatican Council II indicates all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Mulsims and others need to convert into the Church, with faith and baptism, for salvation.
    3.Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the SSPX, has said that the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II as a historical event and that he accepts 90% of the Council.

    B.
    SSPX conditions for the Bishop of Albano.

    So an appeal is made to the Bishop of Albano to also affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions) as mentioned in the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.The SSPX appeals to the Bishop of Albano to interpret and affirm Vatican Council II as they do ( see above) and set an example for all.

    1.Please accept Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need faith and baptism for salvation and so affirms the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

    2.Please accept Vatican Council II in which LG 8,LG 14, LG 16,NA 2,UR 3 are only possibilities and do not refer to explicit exceptions to Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

    Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Vatican Council II indicates all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims and others need to convert into the Church, with faith and baptism, for salvation.
    3.Acknowledge that Bishop Bernard Fellay has said that the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II as a historical event and that he approves of 90% of the Council.

    C.
    Agreement

    Bishop Marcello Semeraro announces that he affirms Vatican Council II in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions) as mentioned in the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 and is willing to interpret and affirm Vatican Council II as mentioned above setting an example for all.

    After this announcement by the Bishop of Albano endorsing Vatican Council II without the premise the SSPX makes an announcement.

    The SSPX announces that since the Bishop of Albano has accepted Vatican Council II in agreement with the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, they also accept this version of the Council.

    Since the bishop interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney, the Church Councils, popes and saints and not according to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Cardinal Richard Cushing, this is acceptable to them.

    Since the Bishop of Albano interprets Vatican Council II according to Tradition i.e according to Feeneyism and not Cushingism; according to the hermeneutic of continuity and not rupture, they accept Vatican Council II without the premise and they reject Vatican Council II with the premise, which results in a break with Tradition.

    Since all sides accept extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted over the centuries, there is no change in Church ecclesiology and the traditional teachings on other religions, Christian communities and religious liberty, in Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.